본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

사상체질 식이중재연구 현황분석 : Participant, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO)를 중심으로

Analysis on Intervention Studies of Sasang Constitutional Diet : Participant, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO)

김지환
사상체질면역의학회 (The Society of Sasang Constitution and Immune Medicine)|2021.03|사상체질면역의학회지 (Journal of Sasang Constitution and Immune Medicine)|제33권 제1호|pp. 90-101|DOI https://doi.org/10.7730/JSCM.2021.33.1.90

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

DietSasang Constitutional MedicineSasang ConstitutionInterventionDiet therapyResearch design
주제분류한의학

초록

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate intervention studies on Sasang Constitutional diet (SCD) through the checks of Participant, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) Methods Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-randomized study for intervention (NRSI) about SCD were searched in 4 Korean core databases and other sources, and then PICO was checked. Results 1. Total 10 studies were conducted with 1 RCT and 9 NRSIs. 2. Participants were people with no specific disease, or patients with essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, or stroke with diabetes or hyperlipidemia. Most studies were conducted on groups of various Sasang Constitutional types except Taeyangin. 3. Two studies provided participants with meals and exercise. Three studies, instead of providing meals directly, taught participants how to eat SCD on their own. 4. NRSIs have tested the effectiveness of various outcome measures without the presentation of primary outcome, and then concluded that all outcomes were ineffective or some are effective. 5. There was no mention of adverse events. In most studies, a single doctor of Korean medicine diagnosed Sasang Constitution the QSCC II questionnaire. The intervention period ranged from three weeks to three months, and recent studies have conducted interventions for 12 weeks. Conclusions Intervention studies about SCD which were conducted so far have shown problems on the study design of PICO items. The study design and implementation that carefully consider how to maintain similarity between groups, minimize the risk of bias, set primary outcome measure, and control the diet are required.

Abstract

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate intervention studies on Sasang Constitutional diet (SCD) through the checks of Participant, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) Methods Randomized controlled trial (RCT) and non-randomized study for intervention (NRSI) about SCD were searched in 4 Korean core databases and other sources, and then PICO was checked. Results 1. Total 10 studies were conducted with 1 RCT and 9 NRSIs. 2. Participants were people with no specific disease, or patients with essential hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, or stroke with diabetes or hyperlipidemia. Most studies were conducted on groups of various Sasang Constitutional types except Taeyangin. 3. Two studies provided participants with meals and exercise. Three studies, instead of providing meals directly, taught participants how to eat SCD on their own. 4. NRSIs have tested the effectiveness of various outcome measures without the presentation of primary outcome, and then concluded that all outcomes were ineffective or some are effective. 5. There was no mention of adverse events. In most studies, a single doctor of Korean medicine diagnosed Sasang Constitution the QSCC II questionnaire. The intervention period ranged from three weeks to three months, and recent studies have conducted interventions for 12 weeks. Conclusions Intervention studies about SCD which were conducted so far have shown problems on the study design of PICO items. The study design and implementation that carefully consider how to maintain similarity between groups, minimize the risk of bias, set primary outcome measure, and control the diet are required.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. A K Akobeng, "Principles of evidence based medicine", Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90(8), pp.837~840 (2005), BMJ[DOI]
  2. Syrene A. Miller, "Enhancing your practice through evidence-based decision making: PICO, learning how to ask good questions", Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice, 1(2), pp.136~141 (2001), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  3. Edgardo Abalos, "The tools and techniques of evidence-based medicine", Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 19(1), pp.15~26 (2005), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  4. J Wyatt, "Identifying the research question and planning the project", Emergency Medicine Journal, 19(4), pp.318~321 (2002), BMJ[DOI]
  5. Patricia W. Stone, "Popping the (PICO) question in research and evidence-based practice", Applied Nursing Research, 15(3), pp.197~198 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  6. 이의주, "‘사상체질진단 및 상담’ 부문의 요양급여 확대를 위한 제안", 사상체질의학회지, 29(4), pp.299~310 (2017), 사상체질의학회[DOI]
  7. 김지환, "사상체질 식이 중재연구 보고에 대한 질 평가", 사상체질의학회지, 32(4), pp.11~28 (2020), 사상체질의학회[DOI]
  8. 이의주, "사상체질분류에 의한 체질식이의 효과 및 활용성에 대한 연구(I)", 사상체질의학회지, 10(2), pp.305~349 (1998), 사상체질의학회
  9. Kim EJ, "The Food Classification in Sasang Constitution and Effects of Tae-eum Constitutional Diet on the Blood Biochemical Parameters and Health Status", J Nutr Health, 32(7), pp.827~837 (1999)
  10. Lee EJ, "Constitutional Dietary Therapy in Diabetes Mellitus", J. Oriental Med., 4(1), pp.73~83 (1999)
  11. 이의주, "고지혈증환자의 체질식이 효과", 사상체질의학회지, 11(2), pp.209~226 (1999), 사상체질의학회
  12. Lim KS, "A Clinical Study of the Constitutional Therapeutic Diet on Hyperlipidemia", Kyung Hee Med, 16(1), pp.86~93 (2000)
  13. Kim KB, "Effect of Diet Regimen of Sasang Constitution on Health Status", J. East-West nurs. research., 7(1), pp.18~31 (2002)
  14. 전은영, "사상체질식이 적용이 본태성 고혈압 환자의 혈압, 비만도 및 혈중지질에 미치는 효과: 유산소 운동과 저염식이 병용환자를 대상으로", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 32(5), pp.673~683 (2002), 한국간호과학회
  15. 문보경, "Apo E3 Genotype 고지혈증 환자에서 사상체질에 따른 의학영양치료가 혈중 지질 농도에 미치는 영향", 사상체질의학회지, 15(1), pp.60~71 (2003), 사상체질의학회
  16. 최종인, "사상체질에 따른 식이요법과 유산소운동이 혈중지질(TC, TG), 폐기능(VC, FVC), 신체조성에 미치는 영향", 한국체육학회지, 42(5), pp.735~746 (2003), 한국체육학회
  17. 김병수, "사상체질에 따른 맞춤형 식단이 전신지구력 선수와 기초체력 및 신체조성에 미치는 영향", Physical Activity and Nutrition, 10(2), pp.123~134 (2006), 한국운동영양학회
  18. 인준용, "Randomization in clinical studies", Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 72(3), pp.221~232 (2019), 대한마취통증의학회
  19. Thomas R. Vetter, "Bias, Confounding, and Interaction", Anesthesia & Analgesia, 125(3), pp.1042~1048 (2017), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  20. Anthony M. H. Ho, "Bias in Before–After Studies", Anesthesia & Analgesia, 126(5), pp.1755~1762 (2018), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
  21. Peta M Forder, "Allocation concealment and blinding: when ignorance is bliss", Medical Journal of Australia, 182(2), pp.87~89 (2005), Wiley[DOI]
  22. Chittaranjan Andrade, "The Primary Outcome Measure and Its Importance in Clinical Trials", The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 76(10), pp.e1320~e1323 (2015), Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc[DOI]
  23. Barnaby C. Reeves, "Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 5: a checklist for classifying studies evaluating the effects on health interventions—a taxonomy without labels", Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 89, pp.30~42 (2017), Elsevier BV[DOI]
  24. Ines Krass, "Quasi experimental designs in pharmacist intervention research", International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy (2016), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (5건)

岐伯六經病證과 四象體質病證간의 상관관계 연구이준희pp. 1-21東醫壽世保元에 나타난 經驗方藥의 특징에 대한 고찰김태영, 박성식pp. 22-37소음인 소증 진단평가지표 개발 연구이준희, 황사비pp. 38-56태음인 소증 진단평가도구 개발 연구권진혁, 이준희pp. 57-89피츠버그 수면척도를 이용한 사상체질별 수면 비교김상혁, 정경식, 박기현pp. 102-108
원문 보기