‘Cultural Studies’ as Interdisciplinary Literary Studies
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the boundary and status of as well as issues surrounding ‘cultural studies’ (munhwaronjeok yeongu) as an interdisciplinary study and renewal of traditional literary studies. Basically, cultural studies is essentially inclusive and trans-disciplinary. Although cultural studies is in a particular proximity with other fields of research, it neither shares values with nor falls under major disciplines such as Korean literary studies (gungmunhak), Anglo-American cultural studies, or their tributaries including history of everyday life and micro-history. It observes and critically analyzes political aspects and structures of dominance reflected in cultural phenomena. Cultural studies has always been sensitive to ‘democracy from below’ and its culture, and sought ways to make intellectual action against commodification and marginalization of knowledge and cultural system. Until recently, this task has been fulfilled by studies of ‘cultural (munhwaronjeok) literary history,’ cultural history, or popular culture. This paper also outlines the methodology and perspective of cultural studies by discussing the issues and problems regarding texturalism and other theories. It also argues that the neo-liberalist ‘Regime’ has profound influence on interdisciplinary studies in terms of how Korean literary scholars and critics are employed or supported; the transformation in the writing process and the system of struggle for recognition; as well as governing our bodies and micro-relationships.
Abstract
This paper examines the boundary and status of as well as issues surrounding ‘cultural studies’ (munhwaronjeok yeongu) as an interdisciplinary study and renewal of traditional literary studies. Basically, cultural studies is essentially inclusive and trans-disciplinary. Although cultural studies is in a particular proximity with other fields of research, it neither shares values with nor falls under major disciplines such as Korean literary studies (gungmunhak), Anglo-American cultural studies, or their tributaries including history of everyday life and micro-history. It observes and critically analyzes political aspects and structures of dominance reflected in cultural phenomena. Cultural studies has always been sensitive to ‘democracy from below’ and its culture, and sought ways to make intellectual action against commodification and marginalization of knowledge and cultural system. Until recently, this task has been fulfilled by studies of ‘cultural (munhwaronjeok) literary history,’ cultural history, or popular culture. This paper also outlines the methodology and perspective of cultural studies by discussing the issues and problems regarding texturalism and other theories. It also argues that the neo-liberalist ‘Regime’ has profound influence on interdisciplinary studies in terms of how Korean literary scholars and critics are employed or supported; the transformation in the writing process and the system of struggle for recognition; as well as governing our bodies and micro-relationships.
참고문헌 (37)
- 박헌호, "문학''史' 없는 시대의 문학연구: 우리 시대 한국 근대문학 연구에 대한 어떤 소회", 역사비평, 75(75), pp.92~112 (2006), 역사문제연구소
- 박헌호, "‘문화연구’의 정치성과 역사성 - 근대문학 연구의 현황과 반성 -", 민족문화연구, 53(53), pp.157~188 (2010), 민족문화연구원
- Bak, Heonho, (2013), Somyeong Chulpan
- Bak, Sukja, (2012), Pureun Yeoksa
- 차혜영, "지식의 최전선-'풍속-문화론 연구'에 대한 비판적 검토", 민족문학사연구, 33(33), pp.83~109 (2007), 민족문학사학회
- Cheon, Jung-hwan, ", In Munhaksa ihu ui munhaksa", pp.80~119 (2003), Pureun Yeoksa
- Cheon, Jung-hwan, (2003), Pureun Yeoksa
- 천정환, "‘문화론적 연구’의 현실 인식과 전망", 상허학보, 19, pp.10~36 (2007), 상허학회
- Cheon, Jung-hwan, (2008), Pureun Yeoksa
- Cheon, Jung-hwan, (2010), Pureun Yeoksa
- Cheon, Jung-hwan, (2013), Pureun Yeoksa
- Eagleton, Terry, "After Theory" (2010), Doseochulpan Gil
- Geomyeol Yeonguhoe (Korea Censorship Studies Group), (2011), Somyeong Chulpan
- "박사", Yonsei University, 2009
- Gwon, Myeong-a, (2013), Chaek Sesang
- 하재연, "식민지 문학 연구의 역사주의적 전환과 전망", 상허학보, 35, pp.11~51 (2012), 상허학회[DOI]
- Hall, Stuart, (2010), Gil
- 한순미, "‘서러움’의 정치적 무의식 ― 역사적 신체로서 한하운의 자전(自傳)", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), 94(94), pp.297~332 (2012), 한국사회사학회[DOI]
- 허수, "한국 개념사 연구의 현황과 전망", 역사와 현실, 86(86), pp.361~380 (2012), 한국역사연구회
- 정준영, "식민지 교육정책의 원점 : 이자와 슈지의 동화주의와 청각적 근대성", 정신문화연구, 34(2), pp.153~184 (2011), 한국학중앙연구원
- Jo, Eunjeong, "Author theory and its construction in the 1950s: Focusing on Jo, Yeonheon and Modern Literature", Hanguk hyeondae munhakhoe haksul balpyohoe jaryojip, pp.117~128 (2009)
- 조형근, "근대성의 내재하는 외부로서 식민지성", 식민지적 차이와 변이의 문제, 2007, pp.73(73), 385~418[DOI]
- 조석곤, "농지개혁 진행과정과 정부․지주․농민의 입장 ―경기도 광주군 남종면 사례를 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 75(75), pp.343~411 (2011), 대동문화연구원
- 주은우, "식민지도시와 근대성의 영화적 재현 ― 기록영화 <경성>과 식민권력의 자기재현", 사회와역사(구 한국사회사학회논문집), 92(92), pp.39~91 (2011), 한국사회사학회
- "Minjonk Munhaksa Yeongu", 2001, 71~105
- 김현주, "근대 개념어 연구의 동향과 성과－ 언어의 역사성과 실재성에 주목하라!", 상허학보, 19, pp.150~175 (2007), 상허학회
- 김영선, "결혼․가족담론을 통해 본한국 식민지근대성의 구성 요소와 특징", 여성과 역사, (13), pp.131~172 (2010), 한국여성사학회
- 김예리, "‘언어로의 전회’와 인문학으로서의 작가론", 한국근대문학연구, 27(27), pp.7~33 (2013), 한국근대문학회
- Kwon, Boduerae, (2012), Cheonnyeon ui Sangsang
- Matsumoto, Takenori, (2011), Nonhyeong
- Son, Yugyeong, (2012), Somyeong Chulpan
- "Munhwa Sahoe", 2006, ~
- Yi, Gyeongdon, (2009), Somyeong Chulpan
- 이혜령, "식민자는 말해질 수 있는가 ― 염상섭 소설 속 식민자의 환유들", 대동문화연구, 78(78), pp.317~353 (2012), 대동문화연구원[DOI]
- 이상길, "문화연구의 아포리아: ＂위기담론＂에 대한 반성을 중심으로", 한국언론학보, 48(5), pp.79~109 (2004), 한국언론학회
- 유선영, "식민지 근대성의 사회심리학 : ‘이방인론’을 통해 본 식민지의 근대", 언론과 사회, 20(3), pp.75~119 (2012), 사단법인 언론과 사회
- Yun, Haedong, (2006), Yeoksa Bipyeongsa