본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Toegye’s Appraisal of Daoism

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한국어와문학

초록

The attitudes of Joseon scholars toward Daoist discourse are often understood as hostile and, with a few exceptions, as almost exclusively negative. The example of Toegye Yi Hwang, however, shows that a negative attitude toward Daoist texts and techniques was often accompanied by a thorough knowledge on the part of the scholar attacking them. This phenomenon cannot be fully explained by the necessity of knowing the topic to be criticized in order to better refute it. Daoist discourse contained a broad range of motifs which were appropriated or close to Confucian teaching and if studied properly, Confucian scholars could use them relatively freely without the danger of accusation of heterodox tendencies. The purpose of this study is to analyze the Daoist sources available to Toegye and his treatment of them on the public and private level. This includes the texts of Laozi and Zhuangzi, inner alchemistic treatises such as the Cantong qi, the motif of the immortals, etc. The treatment of these sources in Toegye’s works indicate that while warning against Daoist studies on a public level, he possessed a very good command of them and under certain condition allowed their use in specific areas, especially numerology, medicine, and exegesis of Song dynasty Confucian works.

Abstract

The attitudes of Joseon scholars toward Daoist discourse are often understood as hostile and, with a few exceptions, as almost exclusively negative. The example of Toegye Yi Hwang, however, shows that a negative attitude toward Daoist texts and techniques was often accompanied by a thorough knowledge on the part of the scholar attacking them. This phenomenon cannot be fully explained by the necessity of knowing the topic to be criticized in order to better refute it. Daoist discourse contained a broad range of motifs which were appropriated or close to Confucian teaching and if studied properly, Confucian scholars could use them relatively freely without the danger of accusation of heterodox tendencies. The purpose of this study is to analyze the Daoist sources available to Toegye and his treatment of them on the public and private level. This includes the texts of Laozi and Zhuangzi, inner alchemistic treatises such as the Cantong qi, the motif of the immortals, etc. The treatment of these sources in Toegye’s works indicate that while warning against Daoist studies on a public level, he possessed a very good command of them and under certain condition allowed their use in specific areas, especially numerology, medicine, and exegesis of Song dynasty Confucian works.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Adler, Joseph, "Reconstructing the Confucian Dao : Zhu Xi’s Appropriation of Zhou Dunyi" (2012), State University of New York Press
  2. Chan, Wing-tsit, "Reflections on Things at Hand" (1967), Columbia University Press
  3. Chan, Wing-tsit, "Chu Hsi’s Appraisal of Lao Tzu", Philosophy East and West, 25(2), pp.131~144 (1975)
  4. Chan, Wing-tsit, "Chu Hsi : New Studies" (1989), University of Hawaii Press
  5. Choe, Jeongi, "Joseon sidae dogaseo ganhaeng mit panbon bunseok" (2012), Gyeongsang National University Press
  6. Deuchler, Martina, "The Rise of Neo-Confucianism in Korea", pp.375~410 (1985), Columbia University Press
  7. Gang, Jaecheol, "Toegye seonsaeng seolhwa" (2011), Dankook University Press
  8. Glomb, Vladimir, "Integration Processes in the Circulation of Knowledge: Cases from Korea", pp.15~47 (2016), Peter Lang Academic Research
  9. Gwon, Dugyeong, "Changseoljae jip", 古 3648-文 07-76, HMCG 169, National Library of Korea, ~
  10. Gwon, Obong, "Gyesa namhaengnok i ganneun Toegye ui pyeongsaengsajeok uimi", Toegyehak yeongu, 5, pp.29~63 (1991)
  11. "Hwadam jip", 4-6673, HMCG 24, Janseogak, The Academy of Korean Studies., ~
  12. Jeong, Seoktae, "Toegye seonsaeng yeonpyo woril jorok" (2001), Toegyehak yeonguwon
  13. Jeong, Yagyong, "Yeoyudang jeonseo", 古 3648-文 69-2, HMCG 281-86, National Library of Korea, ~ (1934)
  14. 조남호, "선조의 주역과 참동계 연구, 그리고 동의보감", 仙道文化, 15, pp.395~426 (2013), 국학연구원[DOI]
  15. Kim, Daeyeol, "Chosŏn Confucian Scholar’s Attitudes toward the Laozi", Sungkyun Journal of East Asian Studies, 7(2), pp.17~22 (2007)
  16. Kohn, Livia, "Science and the Dao : From the Big Bang to Lived Perfection" (2016), Three Pines Press
  17. Louis, François, "The Genesis of an Icon : The Taiji Diagram’s Early History", Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 63(1), pp.145~196 (2003)
  18. Pregadio, Fabrizio, "The Seal of the Unity of the Three" (2011), Golden Elixir Press
  19. "Toegye jeonseo", #古 3428-82, Kyujanggak, Seoul National University, ~ (1843)
  20. "Toegye seonsaeng eonhaengnok" (1922), Dosan seowon
  21. 이봉호, "조선시대 『참동계』 주석서의 몇 가지 특징", 도교문화연구, (29), pp.61~87 (2008), 한국도교문화학회
  22. 이대승, "『周易參同契考異』 南九萬本과 「參同契吐註」 연구", 藏書閣, (27), pp.152~173 (2012), 한국학중앙연구원[DOI]
  23. Yi, Deoghong, "Ganjae jip", 811.98, 간-목, HMCG 332-36, Yonsei University Library, ~
  24. Yi, Heuidae, "Toegye seonsaeng ui sujeok Hwarin simbang", Toegye hakbo, 4, pp.184~192 (1974)
  25. Yi, Jinsu, "Toegye cheolhak ui yangsaeng sasang e gwanhan yeongu", Hanguk dogyo yeongu, 6, pp.81~142 (1992)
  26. Yi, Jongeun, "Dogyo wa Hanguk munhwa", pp.87~190 (1988), Asea munhwasa
  27. "Yulgok jeonseo", #811.97-Yi I-Yul, Sejong University Library, ~ (1814)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)