Korean and Chinese Settlers and Migrant Workers in the Soviet Far East (1920–1930)
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the late 1920s, the Soviet Union launched an official campaign against the so-called “Great Russian chauvinism.” As a result, the Bolshevik Party embarked on a relentless offensive against this phenomenon. Decisions related to the support of national minorities were made at governmental and regional levels across all regions of the country. Soviet indigenization policy and the ill-conceived population resettlement policy contributed to the rise of nationalism. Resettlement was conducted on the entire territory of the Soviet Union with the aim of improving the economy and the national defense capability. The indigenous Slavic population often did not wish to accept the resettled people. In the Far East of the Soviet Union, the so-called Easterners, represented by the Chinese and the Koreans, often endured destructive consequences of local nationalism. Despite this negative experience, the majority of Koreans accepted the official Soviet discourse proclaiming the unity and equality of all nations and participated in the overall Soviet social-economic development and its collectivisation effort. In the Far East, joining a Soviet collective farm (kolkhoz) was the only option of survival for Koreans who were deprived of the right to return to their homeland. Kolkhoz was a safe space where Koreans could band together under state protection against local nationalism. It also gave Korean peasants a chance to work on land in consolidated ethnic units, preserving their language and culture. The Chinese population was primarily represented by seasonal workers. Unlike Koreans, they could freely move back to China at any time. As a result, Chinese were reluctant to join kolkhoz and avoided accepting Soviet citizenship.
Abstract
In the late 1920s, the Soviet Union launched an official campaign against the so-called “Great Russian chauvinism.” As a result, the Bolshevik Party embarked on a relentless offensive against this phenomenon. Decisions related to the support of national minorities were made at governmental and regional levels across all regions of the country. Soviet indigenization policy and the ill-conceived population resettlement policy contributed to the rise of nationalism. Resettlement was conducted on the entire territory of the Soviet Union with the aim of improving the economy and the national defense capability. The indigenous Slavic population often did not wish to accept the resettled people. In the Far East of the Soviet Union, the so-called Easterners, represented by the Chinese and the Koreans, often endured destructive consequences of local nationalism. Despite this negative experience, the majority of Koreans accepted the official Soviet discourse proclaiming the unity and equality of all nations and participated in the overall Soviet social-economic development and its collectivisation effort. In the Far East, joining a Soviet collective farm (kolkhoz) was the only option of survival for Koreans who were deprived of the right to return to their homeland. Kolkhoz was a safe space where Koreans could band together under state protection against local nationalism. It also gave Korean peasants a chance to work on land in consolidated ethnic units, preserving their language and culture. The Chinese population was primarily represented by seasonal workers. Unlike Koreans, they could freely move back to China at any time. As a result, Chinese were reluctant to join kolkhoz and avoided accepting Soviet citizenship.
참고문헌 (31)
- 반병률, "‘전면적 집단화’시기 러시아 연해주 수청(水淸) 지방 한인농촌사회의 제문제", 역사문화연구, (30), pp.153~232 (2008), 역사문화연구소
- Bocharov, Alexey, (2006), TGU (Tomsk State University)
- "Historical and Social Educational Ideas", 2016, 2), pp.52~66
- Chang, Jon K., "Burnt by the Sun : Koreans of the Russian Far East" (2016), University of Hawai’i Press
- "2003", ~
- (2009)[URL]
- "Knizhnoye Izdatel’stvo", 1930
- "Journal of Cultural Research", 2011, 1~15, http:
- Golovin S. A., "History of Political Repressions in the Far East of Russia, 1920s–1930s", PhD, pp.2000
- 황영삼, "우즈베키스탄 고려인 경제공동체의 형성과 발전과정의 재조명", 역사문화연구, (26), pp.45~82 (2007), 역사문화연구소
- , Methodology If Humanitarian Knowledge in the Perspective of the XXI century, "Paper presented at the International Scientific Conference on the 80th Anniversary of Professor Moses Samoilovich Kagan", 2001, ~
- 김현주, "CIS지역 고려인 임차 농업에 내재된 양면성", 한국문예비평연구, (72), pp.161~191 (2021), 한국현대문예비평학회[DOI]
- 김현주, "러시아 고려인의 집단농장체제 적응양상－ 강제이주 후 집단농장체제에 대한 대응방식을 중심으로", 비평문학, (82), pp.55~80 (2021), 한국비평문학회[DOI]
- Koval’chenko, Ivan, (1987), Nauka
- Larin, Alexander, (2009), Vostochnaya Kniga
- 이채문, "중앙아시아 고려인 집거지역의 형성과 변동: 카자흐스탄 끄질오르다의 사례를 중심으로", 한국동북아논총, 21(1), pp.185~210 (2016), 한국동북아학회
- Liu, Xianzhong, "Pros and Cons of the Soviet ‘Indigenization Policy’ in the 1920s", Oecumene, 1, pp.41~49 (2014)
- "Logos", 2005, 310~314
- Martin, Terry, (2011), ROSSPEN
- 2010, , ~
- Smolenskiy, Nickolay, (2007), Izdatel’skiy Tsentr"Akademiya"
- Son, Zhanna, (2013), Grif
- Son, Zhanna, (1821), Akvarius
- "Vestnik Rossiyskoy natsii", 2012, 3, pp.72~90
- Vashchuk, A. S., (2002), DVO RAN
- Wada, Haruki, "Koreans in the Soviet Union" (1987), Center for Korean Studies, University of Hawai’i
- 임영상, "중앙아시아 고려인 경제사회문화 공동체의 형성과 발전우즈베키스탄 타쉬켄트 주의 고려인 콜호즈들", 역사문화연구, (26), pp.3~44 (2007), 역사문화연구소
- "Izvestiya RGPU im. A.I. Gertsena", 2008, 52~61
- "Voprosy istorii", 2009, 137~141
- "Novyy istoricheskiy vestnik", 2017, 1~9
- "Vlast’", 2017, 131~137