본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Comparative Future Cost of Earnings Management between Accrual-Based and Real Activity Earnings Management: Evidence from Stock Price Crash Risk

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류무역학

초록

It has been well documented in previous research that both accrual-based earnings management(hereafter “AM”) and real activity earnings management (hereafter “RAM”) have a negative effect on future firm value. However, there is little evidence to show which type of earnings management incurs more costs. This study fills such a gap by comparing the costs of both AM and RAM from the perspective of stock price crash risk. Using portfolio approach suggested by Dechow and Dichev(2002), the study finds that both AM and RAM are positively associated with stock price crash risk. More importantly, it further finds that AM more increases stock price crash risk than RAM. In subsequent analyses, this study also finds that RAM based on abnormal production is not associated with stock price crash risk. The result supports Gunny(2010)'s finding that earnings management via RAM based on abnormal production does not reflect managerial opportunism, but is more likely to reflect decisions aimed at improving future performance.

Abstract

It has been well documented in previous research that both accrual-based earnings management(hereafter “AM”) and real activity earnings management (hereafter “RAM”) have a negative effect on future firm value. However, there is little evidence to show which type of earnings management incurs more costs. This study fills such a gap by comparing the costs of both AM and RAM from the perspective of stock price crash risk. Using portfolio approach suggested by Dechow and Dichev(2002), the study finds that both AM and RAM are positively associated with stock price crash risk. More importantly, it further finds that AM more increases stock price crash risk than RAM. In subsequent analyses, this study also finds that RAM based on abnormal production is not associated with stock price crash risk. The result supports Gunny(2010)'s finding that earnings management via RAM based on abnormal production does not reflect managerial opportunism, but is more likely to reflect decisions aimed at improving future performance.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Chen, J., "Forecasting Rashes : Trading Volume, Past Returns, and Conditional Skewness in Stock Prices", Journal of Financial Economics, 61, pp.345~381 (2001)
  2. Cohen, D, "Real and Accrual Based Earnings Management in the Pre and Post Sarbanes Oxley Periods", The Accounting Review, 83, pp.757~787 (2008)
  3. Cohen, D., "Accrual-Based and Real Earnings Management Activities around Seasoned Equity Offerings", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, pp.2~19 (2010)
  4. Dechow, P., "The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors", The Accounting Review, 77(Supplement), pp.35~59 (2002)
  5. Dechow, P., "Detecting Earnings Management", The Accounting Review, 70(2), pp.193~225 (1995)
  6. Francis, Bill, "Firm’s Real Earnings Management and Subsequent Stock Price Crash Risk", CAAA Annual Conference (2011)
  7. Graham, J. R., "The Economics Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40, pp.3~73 (2005)
  8. Gunny K. A., "The Rrelation Between Earnings Management Using Real Activities Manipulation and Future Performance : Evidence from Meeting Earnings Benchmarks", Contemporary Accounting Research, 27(3), pp.855~888 (2010)
  9. Hutton, A. P., "Opaque Financial Reports, R2, and Crash Risk", Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), pp.67~86 (2009)
  10. Jin, L., "R2 around The World : New Theory and New Tests", Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), pp.257~292 (2006)
  11. Kim, Yougtae, "Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility?", The Accounting Review, 87(3), pp.761~796 (2012)
  12. Kim, J. -B., "Corporate Tax Avoidance and Stock Price Crash Risk : Firm-Level Analysis", Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), pp.639~662 (2011)
  13. Kim, J. -B., "CFOs versus CEOs : Equity Incentives and Crashes", Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), pp.713~730 (2011)
  14. Kim, J. B., "Financial Reporting Opacity and Expected Crash Risk : Evidence from Implied Volatility Smirks", Contemporary Accounting Research, 31(3), pp.851~875 (2014)
  15. Kim, Y., "Is Earnings Quality Associated with Corporate Social Responsibility?", The Accounting Review, 87(3), pp.761~796 (2012)
  16. Kothari, S. P., "Do Managers Withhold Bad News?", Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1), pp.241~276 (2009)
  17. Graham, j., "The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting", Journal of Accounting & Economics, 40(2005), pp.3~73 (2005)
  18. Nagar, V., "Discretionary Disclosure and Stock-Based Incentives", Journal of Accounting & Economics, 34, pp.283~309 (2003)
  19. Petersen, M. A., "Estimating Standard Errors in Finance Panel Data Sets: Comparing Approaches", The Review of Financial Studies, 22(1), pp.435~480 (2008)
  20. Roychowdhury, S., "Earnings Management Through Real Activities Manipulation", Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42, pp.335~370 (2006)
  21. Zang, A. Y., "Evidence on The Tradeoff Between Real Activities Manipulation and Accrual-Based Earnings Management", The Accounting Review, 87(2), pp.675~703 (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)