족관절 골절 환자에서 원위 경비 인대 결합 손상 유무에 따른 경골의 비골 구에 대한 해부학적 차이
Anatomical Differences of the Fibular Incisura of the Tibia between Ankle Fracture with Syndesmotic Injury and without Syndesmotic Injury
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was performed to compare the anatomic differences of the fibular incisura of the tibia between ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic injuries. Materials and Methods: 42 patients were involved in this study: Group I was composed with 14 cases of ankle fractures with syndesmotic injuries; Group II was composed with 14 cases of ankle fractures without syndesmotic injuries; Group III was composed with 14 cases of volunteers. The height averaged 170.1 cm (range, 159~181 cm) in group I, 168.9 cm (range, 156~184 cm) in group II, and 170.4 cm (range, 161~77 cm) in group III. The mean height did not show a statistically significant difference between groups (p>0.05). All patients were taken axial computed tomography. The length of anterior and posterior facets, angle between anterior and posterior facet, and depth of the fibular incisura of the tibia were measured. Results: The mean length of the anterior facet was 11.5 mm (range, 9.2~15.7 mm) in group I, 12.2 mm (range, 7.3~17.0 mm) in group II, and 10.3 mm (range, 8.7~14.0 mm) in group III (p>0.05). The mean length of the posterior facet was 12.3 mm (range, 9.0~14.5 mm) in group I, 11.0 mm (range, 7.3~16.2 mm) in group II, and 13.0 mm (range, 9.2~15.9 mm) in group III (p>0.05). The mean angle between anterior and posterior facet was 139.1 degrees (range, 125.5~154.0 degrees) in group I, 144.2 degrees (range, 134.7~152.6 degrees) in group II, and 131.5 degrees (range, 117.6~144.4 degrees) in group III (p<0.05). The mean depth of the fibular incisura of the tibia was 4.1 mm (range, 3.2~5.8 mm) in group I, 4.6 mm (range, 3.1~7.1 mm) in group II, and 3.1 mm (range, 1.5~4.0 mm) in group III (p<0.05). Conclusion: There are some statistical differences of angle between anterior and posterior facet and depth of the fibular incisura of the tibia between ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic injuries.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was performed to compare the anatomic differences of the fibular incisura of the tibia between ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic injuries. Materials and Methods: 42 patients were involved in this study: Group I was composed with 14 cases of ankle fractures with syndesmotic injuries; Group II was composed with 14 cases of ankle fractures without syndesmotic injuries; Group III was composed with 14 cases of volunteers. The height averaged 170.1 cm (range, 159~181 cm) in group I, 168.9 cm (range, 156~184 cm) in group II, and 170.4 cm (range, 161~77 cm) in group III. The mean height did not show a statistically significant difference between groups (p>0.05). All patients were taken axial computed tomography. The length of anterior and posterior facets, angle between anterior and posterior facet, and depth of the fibular incisura of the tibia were measured. Results: The mean length of the anterior facet was 11.5 mm (range, 9.2~15.7 mm) in group I, 12.2 mm (range, 7.3~17.0 mm) in group II, and 10.3 mm (range, 8.7~14.0 mm) in group III (p>0.05). The mean length of the posterior facet was 12.3 mm (range, 9.0~14.5 mm) in group I, 11.0 mm (range, 7.3~16.2 mm) in group II, and 13.0 mm (range, 9.2~15.9 mm) in group III (p>0.05). The mean angle between anterior and posterior facet was 139.1 degrees (range, 125.5~154.0 degrees) in group I, 144.2 degrees (range, 134.7~152.6 degrees) in group II, and 131.5 degrees (range, 117.6~144.4 degrees) in group III (p<0.05). The mean depth of the fibular incisura of the tibia was 4.1 mm (range, 3.2~5.8 mm) in group I, 4.6 mm (range, 3.1~7.1 mm) in group II, and 3.1 mm (range, 1.5~4.0 mm) in group III (p<0.05). Conclusion: There are some statistical differences of angle between anterior and posterior facet and depth of the fibular incisura of the tibia between ankle fractures with and without syndesmotic injuries.
참고문헌 (26)
- Beumer A, "Radiographic measurement of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis has limited use", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 423, pp.227~234 (2004)
- Brown KW, "MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 182, pp.131~136 (2004)
- Cedell CA, "Supination-outward rotation injuries of the ankle. A clinical and roentgenological study with special reference to the operative treatment", Acta Orthop Scand, 110, pp.15~64 (1967)
- Cedell CA, "Ankle lesions", Acta Orthop Scand, 46, pp.425~445 (1975)
- Day GA, "Operative treatment of ankle fractures: a minimum ten-year follow-up", Foot Ankle Int, 22, pp.102~106 (2001)
- Ebraheim NA, "Syndesmotic disruption in low fibular fractures associated with deltoid ligament injury", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 409, pp.260~267 (2003)
- Ebraheim NA, "Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study", Foot Ankle Int, 18, pp.693~698 (1997)
- Ebraheim NA, "The fibular incisure of the tibia on CT scan: a cadaver study", Foot Ankle Int, 19, pp.318~321 (1998)
- Harper MC, "An anatomic and radiographic investigation of the tibiofibular clear space", Foot Ankle, 14, pp.455~458 (1993)
- Harper MC, "A radiographic evaluation of the tibiofibular syndesmosis", Foot Ankle, 10, pp.156~160 (1989)
- Höcker K, "The fibular incisure of the tibia. The cross-sectional position of the fibula in distal syndesmosis", Unfallchirurg, 92, pp.401~406 (1989)
- Hopkinson WJ, "Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle", Foot Ankle, 10, pp.325~330 (1990)
- Lauge-Hansen N, "Fractures of the ankle. II. Combined experimental -surgical and experimental-roentgenologic investigations", Arch Surg, 60, pp.957~985 (1950)
- Leeds HC, "Instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures", J Bone Joint Surg, 66(A), pp.490~503 (1984)
- Muhle C, "Tibiofibular syndesmosis: high-resolution MRI using a local gradient coil", J Comput Assist Tomogr, 22, pp.938~944 (1998)
- Muratli HH, "Magnetic resonance arthrographic evaluation of syndesmotic diastasis in ankle fractures", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 125, pp.222~227 (2005)
- Nielson JH, "Correlation of interosseous membrane tears to the level of the fibular fracture", J Orthop Trauma, 18, pp.68~74 (2004)
- Oae K, "Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis", Radiology, 227, pp.155~161 (2003)
- Pettrone FA, "Quantitative criteria for prediction of the results after displaced fracture of the ankle", J Bone Joint Surg, 65(A), pp.667~677 (1983)
- Roberts RS, "Surgical treatment of displaced ankle fractures", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 172, pp.164~170 (1983)
- Sclafani SJ, "Ligamentous injury of the lower tibiofibular syndesmosis: radiographic evidence", Radiology, 156, pp.21~27 (1985)
- Snedden MH, "Diastasis with low distal fibula fractures: an anatomic rationale", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 382, pp.197~205 (2001)
- Takao M, "Diagnosis of a tear of the tibiofibular syndesmosis. The role of arthroscopy of the ankle", J Bone Joint Surg, 85(B), pp.324~329 (2003)
- Wuest TK, "Injuries to the Distal Lower Extremity Syndesmosis", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 5, pp.172~181 (1997)
- Yablon IG, "Reconstruction of malunited fractures of the lateral malleolus", J Bone Joint Surg, 71(A), pp.521~527 (1989)
- Yildirim H, "Evaluation of the fibular incisura of the tibia with magnetic resonance imaging", Foot Ankle Int, 24, pp.387~391 (2003)