무지 외반증의 중증도에 대한 전산화 영상 계측
The Computerized Measurement for the Radiological Severity of Hallux Valgus
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To study the reliability of intra- and interobserver reliability in angular measurement of hallux valgus deformity by assessing hallux valgus angle (HVA) and the 1st to 2nd intermetatarsal angle (1-2 IMA) through using computerized system. Materials and Methods: 20 cases of moderate to severe hallux valgus patients were included in this study. With the standing anteroposterior view of foot, the HVA and 1-2 IMA were calculated by computerized measurement system of Infinity cooperation, called π-view, with its software tools. Using the statistical software program, SPSS (version 12th), we interpreted the results which were measured by two independent observers. Results: In the intraobserver measurement, the HVA of observer A showed reliability (32.5°±6.9 and 33.1°±6.8)(p<0.05). 1-2 IMA in observer A was not regarded as reliable (16.9°±2.8 and 17.1°±2.8)(p>0.05). In the results of observer B, HVAs were measured as 35.7°±7.6 and 36.2°±7.7, and were not reliable (p>0.05). 1-2 IMA in observer B was not reliable as well (17.0°±0.8 and 20.8°±1.5)(p>0.05). In the interobservers’ measurements, the first and the second results of HVA were 3.2°±3.6 and 3.1°±3.1, reliable within the 95% confidence interval (p<0.05). 1-2 IMAs were 0.1°±1.9 and 3.73°±1.3, which were not reliable (p>0.05). Conclusion: In the angular measurement of the hallux valgus by computerized system, the HVA and 1-2 IMA showed less error range in the interobserver’s results, compared with the previous studies about the manual measurement. However, our results failed to show the statistical reliability of intra- and interobserver’s measuring. Therefore, even the computerized angular measurements in the severity of hallux valgus require development of the measuring methods and software tools.
Abstract
Purpose: To study the reliability of intra- and interobserver reliability in angular measurement of hallux valgus deformity by assessing hallux valgus angle (HVA) and the 1st to 2nd intermetatarsal angle (1-2 IMA) through using computerized system. Materials and Methods: 20 cases of moderate to severe hallux valgus patients were included in this study. With the standing anteroposterior view of foot, the HVA and 1-2 IMA were calculated by computerized measurement system of Infinity cooperation, called π-view, with its software tools. Using the statistical software program, SPSS (version 12th), we interpreted the results which were measured by two independent observers. Results: In the intraobserver measurement, the HVA of observer A showed reliability (32.5°±6.9 and 33.1°±6.8)(p<0.05). 1-2 IMA in observer A was not regarded as reliable (16.9°±2.8 and 17.1°±2.8)(p>0.05). In the results of observer B, HVAs were measured as 35.7°±7.6 and 36.2°±7.7, and were not reliable (p>0.05). 1-2 IMA in observer B was not reliable as well (17.0°±0.8 and 20.8°±1.5)(p>0.05). In the interobservers’ measurements, the first and the second results of HVA were 3.2°±3.6 and 3.1°±3.1, reliable within the 95% confidence interval (p<0.05). 1-2 IMAs were 0.1°±1.9 and 3.73°±1.3, which were not reliable (p>0.05). Conclusion: In the angular measurement of the hallux valgus by computerized system, the HVA and 1-2 IMA showed less error range in the interobserver’s results, compared with the previous studies about the manual measurement. However, our results failed to show the statistical reliability of intra- and interobserver’s measuring. Therefore, even the computerized angular measurements in the severity of hallux valgus require development of the measuring methods and software tools.
참고문헌 (23)
- Van Vo H, "A comparison of 4 common methods of hand-measured techniques with a computerized technique to measure the first intermetatarsal angle", J Foot Ankle Surg, 43, pp.395~399 (2004)
- Shea KG, "A comparison of manual versus computer-assisted radiographic measurement. intraobserver measurement variability for Cobb angles", Spine, 23, pp.551~55 (1998)
- Coughlin MJ, "Angular measurements in the evaluation of hallux valgus deformities: a report of the ad hoc committee of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society on angular measurements", Foot Ankle Int, 23, pp.68~74 (2002)
- Chiodo CP, "Clinical results with the Ludloff osteotomy for correction of adult hallux valgus", Foot Ankle Int, 25, pp.532~536 (2004)
- Panchbhavi VK, "Comparison between manual and computer-assisted measurements of hallux valgus parameters", Foot Ankle Int, 25, pp.708~711 (2004)
- Hamers S, "Digital radiography with a large-scale electronic flat-panel detector vs. screenfilm radiography: observer preference in clinical skeletal diagnostics", Eur Radiol, 11, pp.1753~1759 (2001)
- Farber DC, "Goniometric versus computerized angle measurement in assessing hallux valgus", Foot Ankle Int, 26, pp.234~238 (2005)
- Coughlin MJ, "Hallux valgus", J Bone Joint Surg, 78-A, pp.932~966 (1996)
- Smith RW, "Hallux valgus assessment: report of research committee of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society", Foot Ankle, 5, pp.92~103 (1984)
- Mann RA, "Hallux valgus--etiology, anatomy, treatment and surgical considerations", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 157, pp.31~41 (1981)
- Schneider W, "Intra-and interobserver repeatability of radiographic measurements in hallux surgery: improvement and validation of a method", Acta Orthop Scand, 73, pp.670~673 (2002)
- Resch S, "Measuring hallux valgus: a comparison of conventional radiography and clinical parameters with regard to measurement accuracy", Foot Ankle Int, 16, pp.267~270 (1995)
- Jones DH, "Modern concepts in the treatment of hallux valgus", J Bone Joint Surg, 88-B, pp.276~ (2006)
- Hardy RH, "Observations on hallux valgus; based on a controlled series", J Bone Joint Surg, 33-B, pp.376~392 (1951)
- Piqué-Vidal C, "Radiographic angles in hallux valgus: differences between measurements made manually and with a computerized program", Foot Ankle Int, 27, pp.175~180 (2006)
- Menz HB, "Radiographic validation of the Manchester scale for the classification of hallux valgus deformity", Rheumatology (Oxford), 44, pp.1061~1066 (2005)
- De Carvalho A, "Reliability analysis for manual measurement of coronal plane deformity in adolescent scoliosis. Are 30 x 90 cm plain films better thandigitized small films?", Eur Spine J, 16, pp.1615~1620 (2007)
- Mann RA, "Repair of hallux valgus with a distal soft-tissue procedure and proximal metatarsal osteotomy: A long-term follow-up", J Bone Joint Surg, 74-A, pp.124~129 (1992)
- Schneider W, "Reproducibility of the radiographic metatarsophalangeal angle in hallux surgery", J Bone Joint Surg, 85-A, pp.494~499 (2003)
- Condon F, "The first intermetatarsal angle in hallux valgus: an analysis of measurement reliability and the error involved", Foot Ankle Int, 23, pp.717~721 (2002)
- Coughlin MJ, "The reliability of angular measurements in hallux valgus deformities", Foot Ankle Int, 22, pp.369~379 (2001)
- Kilmartin TE, "A controlled prospective trial ofa foot orthosis for juvenile hallux valgus", J Bone Joint Surg, 76-B, pp.210~214 (1994)
- Vittetoe DA, "Validity and reliability of the first distal metatarsal articular angle", Foot Ankle Int, 15, pp.541~547 (1994)