증상이 있는 청소년기 부주상골의 수술적 치료
Surgical Treatment of Symptomatic Accessory Navicular in Adolescent
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To investigate the results of surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular in adolescent. Materials and Methods: 11 patients who were 11~16 years old with symptomatic accessory navicular were identified between 2001and 2009. Six cases were diagnosed after trauma and 8 cases were diagnosed by accident with painful bony protrusion on medial aspect of foot. In cases after at least 3 months of ineffective conservative treatment, patients were treated by resection of accessory navicular and reattachment of tibialis posterior tendon to the apex of the medial longitudinal arch using periosteum and ligamentous soft tissue without transposition of its course. And then short leg cast was applied for correction of the flat foot (if it is combined) which was molded into the longitudinal arch with the talonavicular joint released and foot inverted during about 6weeks. Results: All were type II accessory navicular without tibialis posterior tendon lesions. In most cases pain was improved, results were excellent in seven and good in four. Calcaneal pitch angle and talus-first metatarsal angle was improved about 4.64° and 5.79° in average. Conclusion: Symptomatic accessory navicular in adolescent might not be associated with the tibialis posterior tendon lesions. The surgical treatment composed of excision of the accessory navicular with simple replication of the tibialis posterior tendon without altering its course led to good results in most cases. The procedure has a low rate of complications. And it is easy to be performed with a good satisfaction.
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the results of surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular in adolescent. Materials and Methods: 11 patients who were 11~16 years old with symptomatic accessory navicular were identified between 2001and 2009. Six cases were diagnosed after trauma and 8 cases were diagnosed by accident with painful bony protrusion on medial aspect of foot. In cases after at least 3 months of ineffective conservative treatment, patients were treated by resection of accessory navicular and reattachment of tibialis posterior tendon to the apex of the medial longitudinal arch using periosteum and ligamentous soft tissue without transposition of its course. And then short leg cast was applied for correction of the flat foot (if it is combined) which was molded into the longitudinal arch with the talonavicular joint released and foot inverted during about 6weeks. Results: All were type II accessory navicular without tibialis posterior tendon lesions. In most cases pain was improved, results were excellent in seven and good in four. Calcaneal pitch angle and talus-first metatarsal angle was improved about 4.64° and 5.79° in average. Conclusion: Symptomatic accessory navicular in adolescent might not be associated with the tibialis posterior tendon lesions. The surgical treatment composed of excision of the accessory navicular with simple replication of the tibialis posterior tendon without altering its course led to good results in most cases. The procedure has a low rate of complications. And it is easy to be performed with a good satisfaction.
참고문헌 (16)
- Shands Jr AR, "Congenital anomalies, accessory bones and osteochondritis in the feet of 850 children", Surg Clin North Am, 33, pp.16~43 (1953)
- Ray S, "Surgical treatment of the accessory navicular", Clin Orthop, 177, pp.61~66 (1983)
- Sella E, "Biomechanics of the accessory navicular synchondrosis", Foot Ankle, 8, pp.156~163 (1987)
- Chen YJ, "Posterior tibial tendon tear combined with a fracture of the accessory navicular: A new subclassification", J Tranma, 39, pp.993~996 (1995)
- Chen YJ, "Degeneration of the accessory navicular synchondrosis presenting as rupture of the posterior tibial tendon", J Bone joint Surg, 79, pp.1791~1778 (1997)
- Leonard MH, "Lateral transfer of the posterior tibial tendon in certain selected cases of pes plano valgus (kidner operation)", Clin Orthop, 40, pp.139~144 (1965)
- Prichasuk S, "Kidner procedure for symptomatic accessory navicular and it’s relation to pes planus", Foot Ankle Int, 16, pp.500~503 (1995)
- Grogan DP, "The painful accessory navicular: a clinical and histopathological study", Foot Ankle, 10, pp.164~169 (1989)
- Sullivan JA, "The relationship of the accessory navicular to the development of the flat foot", Clin Orthop, 144, pp.233~237 (1979)
- Barbara J, "Result of simple excision technique in the surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular bones", Foot and Ankle Surg, 14, pp.57~61 (2008)
- Lee WC, "The symptomatic accessory navicucular in adult", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 5, pp.62~68 (2001)
- Lee KT, "Accessory navicular in sports players", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 8, pp.161~165 (2004)
- Park JH, "The treatment of failed kidner procedure for adolescent prehallux: A case report", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 11, pp.244~247 (2007)
- Park YW, "Comparison of radiographic results from simple bone excision and bone excision with advancement of posterior tibial tendon for painful prehallux", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 6, pp.40~45 (2002)
- Sung IH, "Adult acquired flat foot, associated with old synchondral diastasis of accessory navicular", J Korean Soc Foot Surg, 6, pp.256~260 (2002)
- Macnicol MF, "Surgical treatment of the symptomatic accessory navicular", J bone joint Surg, 66, pp.218~226 (1984)