잠김 금속판을 이용한 중족부 관절 유합술의 결과
Result of Midfoot Fusion with Locking Plate
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the results of midfoot arthrodesis with locking plate fixation and the other instruments. Materials and Methods: Twenty one patients, a total of 22 feet who underwent midfoot arthrodesis at our institution were reviewed retrospectively from January 2006 to December 2011. Locking plates were used in 9 cases, and the other instruments such as K-wires, screws, staples were used in 13 cases. Radiologic union time was evaluated and compared between both groups. Preoperative & postoperative AOFAS midfoot scores were evaluated and compared as clinical results. Results: The average AOFAS score was rising from 69.7 to 89.4 in locking plate group and from 67.6 to 80.7 in the other instrument group. There was no statistically significant difference in two groups (p=0.179). The mean radiologic union time was 10.2 weeks in locking plate group, 12.6 weeks in the other instrument group with no significant difference (p=0.062). One case of peroneal nerve irritation was detected as a complication in locking plate group. One case of peroneal nerve irritation and 1 case of superficial wound infection with skin sloughing were detected in the other instrument group. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference for union time and clinical results in both groups. A locking plate can be one of the useful option for midfoot arthrodesis.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the results of midfoot arthrodesis with locking plate fixation and the other instruments. Materials and Methods: Twenty one patients, a total of 22 feet who underwent midfoot arthrodesis at our institution were reviewed retrospectively from January 2006 to December 2011. Locking plates were used in 9 cases, and the other instruments such as K-wires, screws, staples were used in 13 cases. Radiologic union time was evaluated and compared between both groups. Preoperative & postoperative AOFAS midfoot scores were evaluated and compared as clinical results. Results: The average AOFAS score was rising from 69.7 to 89.4 in locking plate group and from 67.6 to 80.7 in the other instrument group. There was no statistically significant difference in two groups (p=0.179). The mean radiologic union time was 10.2 weeks in locking plate group, 12.6 weeks in the other instrument group with no significant difference (p=0.062). One case of peroneal nerve irritation was detected as a complication in locking plate group. One case of peroneal nerve irritation and 1 case of superficial wound infection with skin sloughing were detected in the other instrument group. Conclusion: There was no statistically significant difference for union time and clinical results in both groups. A locking plate can be one of the useful option for midfoot arthrodesis.
참고문헌 (18)
- Sayeed SA, "Midfoot Arthritis : A review", Am J Orthop, 37, pp.251~256 (2008)
- Peicha G, "The anatomy of the joint as a risk factor for Lisfranc dislocation and fracture dislocation: An anatomical and radiological case control study", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 84, pp.981~985 (2002)
- Patel A, "Midfoot arthritis", J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 18, pp.417~425 (2010)
- Sack K, "Monarthritis: Differential diagnosis", Am J Med, 102, pp.30~34 (1997)
- Richter M, "Fractures and fracture dislocations of the midfoot : Occurrence, causes and longterm results", Foot Ankle Int, 22, pp.392~398 (2001)
- Myerson MS, "Fracture dislocations of the tarsometatarsal joints: End results correlated with pathology and treatment", Foot Ankle, 6, pp.225~242 (1986)
- Kuo RS, "Outcome after open reduction and internal fixation of Lisfranc joint injuries", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 82, pp.1609~1618 (2000)
- Rao SN, "Midfoot arthritis : Nonoperative options and decision making for fusion", Tech Foot Ankle Surg, 7, pp.188~195 (2008)
- Nemec SA, "Outcomes following midfoot arthrodesis for primary arthritis", Foot Ankle Int, 32, pp.355~361 (2011)
- Kilmartin TE, "Fusion of the second metatarsocuneiform joint for the painful osteoarthrosis", Foot Ankle Int, 29, pp.1079~1087 (2008)
- Mann RA, "Midtarsal and tarsometatarsal arthrodesis for primary degenerative osteoarthrosis or osteoarthrosis after trauma", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78, pp.1376~1385 (1996)
- Jung HG, "Spectrum of operative treatments and clinical outcomes for atraumatic osteoarthritis of the tarsometatarsal joints", Foot Ankle Int, 28, pp.482~489 (2007)
- Ferris LR, "Late reconstruction of the midfoot and tarsometatarsal region after trauma", Orthop Clin N Am, 26, pp.393~406 (1995)
- Jarrell SE 3rd, "Biomechanical comparison of screw versus plate", screw construct for talonavicular fusion, 2009, pp.30, 150~156
- Suh JS, "Dorsal modified calcaneal plate for extensive midfoot arthrodesis", Foot Ankle Int, 26, pp.503~509 (2005)
- Marks RM, "Midfoot fusion technique for neuroarthropathic feet : Biomechanical analysis and rationale", Foot Ankle Int, 19, pp.507~510 (1998)
- DeVries JG, "Fixation of first tarsometatarsal arthrodesis: a retrospective comparative cohort of two techniques", Foot Ankle Int, 3, pp.158~162 (2011)
- Ruchelsman DE, "The role of locking technology in the hand", Hand Clin, 26, pp.307~319 (2010)