원위 경골 골절에서 금속정 및 금속판 고정술의 결과 비교
Comparison of the Results between Intramedullary Nailing and Plate Fixation for Distal Tibia Fractures
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: We analyzed and compared the clinical and radiologic results between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and internal fixation using intramedullary (IM) nail in the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Materials and Methods: From March 2005 to June 2013, 65 cases of distal tibia fractures treated with either plate fixation or IM nail fixation were analyzed retrospectively by clinical and radiologic evaluations. The clinical results were compared using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the last follow-up. The radiologic results were compared by time to bone union, complications such as nonunion, delayed union, and malunion. Results: The clinical results (according to OMAS, AOFAS score, and VAS score) were 77.47, 84.76, and 1.75, respectively, in the plating group, and 90.21, 91.00, and 1.25, respectively, in the nailing group, and there was no statistically significant difference. Plating group showed earlier union than the nailing group and the nailing group showed higher frequency of non-union and delayed union than plating group. Conclusion: In treatment of distal tibia fractures, two methods showed appropriate results. Therefore, thorough investigation of the types of fracture, state of soft tissues, and advantages and disadvantages of the two methods should be conducted in the treatment of distal tibia fractures.
Abstract
Purpose: We analyzed and compared the clinical and radiologic results between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and internal fixation using intramedullary (IM) nail in the treatment of distal tibia fractures. Materials and Methods: From March 2005 to June 2013, 65 cases of distal tibia fractures treated with either plate fixation or IM nail fixation were analyzed retrospectively by clinical and radiologic evaluations. The clinical results were compared using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, Olerud-Molander ankle score (OMAS), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score at the last follow-up. The radiologic results were compared by time to bone union, complications such as nonunion, delayed union, and malunion. Results: The clinical results (according to OMAS, AOFAS score, and VAS score) were 77.47, 84.76, and 1.75, respectively, in the plating group, and 90.21, 91.00, and 1.25, respectively, in the nailing group, and there was no statistically significant difference. Plating group showed earlier union than the nailing group and the nailing group showed higher frequency of non-union and delayed union than plating group. Conclusion: In treatment of distal tibia fractures, two methods showed appropriate results. Therefore, thorough investigation of the types of fracture, state of soft tissues, and advantages and disadvantages of the two methods should be conducted in the treatment of distal tibia fractures.
참고문헌 (17)
- 김성규, "원위 경골 골절에서 잠김 압박 금속판을 이용한 최소 침습적 골유합술", 대한골절학회지, 24(1), pp.33~40 (2011), 대한골절학회
- 이기병, "원위 경골 골절에서 최소 침습적 금속판과교합성 골수강 내고정의 비교", 대한골절학회지, 21(4), pp.286~291 (2008), 대한골절학회
- Wyrsch B, "Operative treatment of fractures of the tibial plafond. A randomized, prospective study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 78, pp.1646~1657 (1996)
- 정수태, "잠김-압박 금속판을 사용하여 MIPPO 수기를 적용한 원위부 경골 골절의 치료: 관절내 골절과 관절외 골절의 비교", 대한족부족관절학회지, 13(2), pp.162~168 (2009), 대한족부족관절학회
- Edge AJ, "External fixation for complicated tibial fractures", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 63(B), pp.92~97 (1981)
- Helfet DL, "Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of distal fractures of the tibia", Injury, 28(Suppl 1), pp.A42~A48 (1997)
- Lau TW, "Wound complication of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibia fractures", Int Orthop, 32, pp.697~703 (2008)
- Böstman O, "The fibular reciprocal fracture in tibial shaft fractures caused by indirect violence", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 100, pp.115~121 (1982)
- Konrath G, "Intramedullary nailing of unstable diaphyseal fractures of the tibia with distal intraarticular involvement", J Orthop Trauma, 11, pp.200~205 (1997)
- Tyllianakis M, "Interlocking intramedullary nailing in distal tibial fractures", Orthopedics, 23, pp.805~808 (2000)
- Nicoll EA, "Closed and open management of tibial fractures", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 105, pp.144~153 (1974)
- 박인헌, "경골 극원위부 골절에서 교합성 골수강내 금속정을 이용한 치료", 대한골절학회지, 16(3), pp.7~362 (2003), 대한골절학회
- Robinson CM, "Distal metaphyseal fractures of the tibia with minimal involvement of the ankle. Classification and treatment by locked intramedullary nailing", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 77, pp.781~787 (1995)
- 손욱진, "경골 원위부 골절에서 교합성 골수강내 금속정을 이용한 치료", 대한골절학회지, 20(1), pp.3~3 (2007), 대한골절학회
- Im GI, "Distal metaphyseal fractures of tibia: a prospective randomized trial of closed reduction and intramedullary nail versus open reduction and plate and screws fixation", J Trauma, 59, pp.1219~1223 (2005)
- Vallier HA, "Radiographic and clinical comparisons of distal tibia shaft fractures(4 to 11 cm proximal to the plafond) : plating versus intramedullary nailing", J Orthop Trauma, 22, pp.307~311 (2008)
- Mauffrey C, "A randomised pilot trial of"locking plate"fixation versus intramedullary nailing for extra-articular fractures of the distal tibia", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 94, pp.704~708 (2012)