본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

족근관 증후군에서의 신경 전도 검사의 효용성

The Efficacy of Nerve Conduction Study on Tarsal Tunnel Syndrome

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Purpose: Nerve conduction study (NCS) test is a standard diagnostic study of the tarsal tunnel syndrome. The purpose of this study wasto determine the relation between the results of the NCS and postoperative clinical results. Materials and Methods: From June 2004 to July 2015, 104 patients were diagnosed with tarsal tunnel syndrome and treated surgically. Of 104 patients diagnosed through NCS preoperatively and postoperatively, 41 patients were included in this study. There were 23 maleand 18 female patients with mean age of 49.2 years old and the average follow-up period was 15.5 months. NCS, pain visual analoguescale (VAS) score, and subjective satisfaction were examined preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: On the preoperative NCS, 32 patients (78.0%) were positive and 9 patients (22.0%) were negative, and 32 positive NCS patientsconsisted of 9 positive (28.1%), 16 improved (50.0%), and 7 negative (21.9%) postoperatively. VAS score was 7.4 preoperatively and 4.4postoperatively. According to satisfaction, there were 8 excellent (19.5%), 21 good (51.2%), 6 fair (14.6%), and 6 poor (14.6%) patients. For 32 patients who were positive on the preoperative NCS, the postoperative VAS score was 4.87 and there were 7 excellent (21.9%), 16good (50.0%), 4 fair (12.5%), and 5 poor (15.6%) patients. Sixteen patients were negative on the postoperative NCS, with a VAS score of3.75, 1 excellent (6.3%), 11 good (68.8%), 2 fair (12.5%), and 2 poor (12.5%). There was no statistical correlation between the preoperativeNCS and postoperative VAS score (p=0.10), between preoperative NCS and postoperative satisfaction (p=0.799), between preoperativeNCS and postoperative VAS score (p=0.487), and between postoperative NCS and postoperative satisfaction (p=0.251). Conclusion: For patients diagnosed with tarsal tunnel syndrome and treated surgically, NCS showed little correlation with postoperativeresult.

Abstract

Purpose: Nerve conduction study (NCS) test is a standard diagnostic study of the tarsal tunnel syndrome. The purpose of this study wasto determine the relation between the results of the NCS and postoperative clinical results. Materials and Methods: From June 2004 to July 2015, 104 patients were diagnosed with tarsal tunnel syndrome and treated surgically. Of 104 patients diagnosed through NCS preoperatively and postoperatively, 41 patients were included in this study. There were 23 maleand 18 female patients with mean age of 49.2 years old and the average follow-up period was 15.5 months. NCS, pain visual analoguescale (VAS) score, and subjective satisfaction were examined preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: On the preoperative NCS, 32 patients (78.0%) were positive and 9 patients (22.0%) were negative, and 32 positive NCS patientsconsisted of 9 positive (28.1%), 16 improved (50.0%), and 7 negative (21.9%) postoperatively. VAS score was 7.4 preoperatively and 4.4postoperatively. According to satisfaction, there were 8 excellent (19.5%), 21 good (51.2%), 6 fair (14.6%), and 6 poor (14.6%) patients. For 32 patients who were positive on the preoperative NCS, the postoperative VAS score was 4.87 and there were 7 excellent (21.9%), 16good (50.0%), 4 fair (12.5%), and 5 poor (15.6%) patients. Sixteen patients were negative on the postoperative NCS, with a VAS score of3.75, 1 excellent (6.3%), 11 good (68.8%), 2 fair (12.5%), and 2 poor (12.5%). There was no statistical correlation between the preoperativeNCS and postoperative VAS score (p=0.10), between preoperative NCS and postoperative satisfaction (p=0.799), between preoperativeNCS and postoperative VAS score (p=0.487), and between postoperative NCS and postoperative satisfaction (p=0.251). Conclusion: For patients diagnosed with tarsal tunnel syndrome and treated surgically, NCS showed little correlation with postoperativeresult.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Lau JT, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome : a review of the literature", Foot Ankle Int, 20, pp.201~209 (1999)
  2. Kinoshita M, "The dorsiflexion-eversion test for diagnosis of tarsal tunnel syndrome", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 83, pp.1835~1839 (2001)
  3. Gondring WH, "An outcomes analysis of surgical treatment of tarsal tunnel syndrome", Foot Ankle Int, 24, pp.545~550 (2003)
  4. Lee CH, "Prognostic ability of Tinel sign in determining outcome for decompression surgery in diabetic and nondiabetic neuropathy", Ann Plast Surg, 53, pp.523~527 (2004)
  5. Takakura Y, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome caused by coalition associated with a ganglion", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, pp.130~133 (1998)
  6. Kim DH, "Surgical management and results of 135 tibial nerve lesions at the Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center", Neurosurgery, 53, pp.1114~1124 (2003)
  7. Myerson M, "Lipoma as an etiology of tarsal tunnel syndrome : a report of two cases", Foot Ankle, 10, pp.176~179 (1989)
  8. Tsai CC, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome secondary to neurilemoma--a case report", Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 17, pp.216~220 (2001)
  9. Manasseh N, "Malunited calcaneal fracture fragments causing tarsal tunnel syndrome : a rare cause", Foot Ankle Surg, 15, pp.207~209 (2009)
  10. Stefko RM, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome caused by an unrecognized fracture of the posterior process of the talus (Cedell fracture). A case report", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 76, pp.116~118 (1994)
  11. Sammarco GJ, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome caused by an anomalous muscle", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 76, pp.1308~1314 (1994)
  12. Rodriguez D, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome and flexor hallucis longus tendon hypertrophy", Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 96, pp.829~831 (2010)
  13. Sugimoto K, "Tenosynovial osteochondromatosis of the tarsal tunnel", Skeletal Radiol, 32, pp.99~102 (2003)
  14. Sekiya H, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome caused by a talocalcaneal joint amyloidoma in a long-term haemodialysis patient : a case report", J Orthop Surg(Hong Kong), 14, pp.350~353 (2006)
  15. Sammarco GJ, "Outcome of surgical treatment of tarsal tunnel syndrome", Foot Ankle Int, 24, pp.125~131 (2003)
  16. Cimino WR, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome : review of the literature", Foot Ankle, 11, pp.47~52 (1990)
  17. Baylan SP, "Prevalence of the tarsal tunnel syndrome in rheumatoid arthritis", Rheumatol Rehabil, 20, pp.148~150 (1981)
  18. Olivieri I, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome in seronegative spondyloarthropathy", Br J Rheumatol, 28, pp.537~539 (1989)
  19. Frey C, "Magnetic resonance imaging and the evaluation of tarsal tunnel syndrome", Foot Ankle, 14, pp.159~164 (1993)
  20. Reade BM, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome", Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 18, pp.395~408 (2001)
  21. Oh SJ, "Electrophysiological improvement following decompression surgery in tarsal tunnel syndrome", Muscle Nerve, 14, pp.407~410 (1991)
  22. Pfeiffer WH, "Clinical results after tarsal tunnel decompression", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 76, pp.1222~1230 (1994)
  23. Dumitru D, "Somatosensory evoked potentials of the medial and lateral plantar and calcaneal nerves", Muscle Nerve, 14, pp.665~671 (1991)
  24. Felsenthal G, "Across-tarsal-tunnel motor-nerve conduction technique", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 73, pp.64~69 (1992)
  25. DiStefano V, "Tarsal-tunnel syndrome. Review of the literature and two case reports", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 88, pp.76~79 (1972)
  26. Oh SJ, "The near-nerve sensory nerve conduction in tarsal tunnel syndrome", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 48, pp.999~1003 (1985)
  27. Takakura Y, "Tarsal tunnel syndrome. Causes and results of operative treatment", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 73, pp.125~128 (1991)
  28. Goodgold J, "The tarsal-tunnel syndrome. Objective diagnostic criteria", N Engl J Med, 273, pp.742~745 (1965)
  29. Le Quesne PM, "Recovery of conduction velocity distal to a compressive lesion", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 37, pp.1346~1351 (1974)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)