Haglund씨 병에서 시행한 내시경적 감압술의 결과
The Results of the Endoscopic Decompression for the Treatment of Haglund’s Disease
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Haglund’s disease represents a painful heel caused by mechanically induced inflammation of the retrocalcaneal bursa and insertional Achilles tendinosis may coexist. Traditional open surgery can cause complications such as skin breakdown, painful scar and altered sensation around the heel. Endoscopic treatment offers the advantages that are related to minimally invasive procedure and we evaluate the clinical results and operative techniques of endoscopic decompression of retrocalcaneal space for Haglund’s disease. Materials and Methods: Our retrospective study included seven heels in six consecutive patients for which nonoperative treatment had failed and endoscopic decompression was performed. The mean age was forty-one years (range, 28 to 53 years). All of the patients had typical complaints of inflammation of the retrocalcaneal bursa and Fowler-Philip angle of more than 75° and positive parallel pitch lines were present on the lateral calcaneal radiograph. The endoscopic procedure consists of the resection of inflamed retrocalcaneal bursa and enough bone to prevent impingement of the bursa between the calcaneus and Achilles tendon. All patients were evaluated with radiologic angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and Ogilvie-Harris functional score. The mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 15 to 21 months). Results: The mean operation time was 61 minutes (range, 50 to 85 minutes). VAS for pain and Fowler-Philip angle were decreased from preoperative 8.7 and 82° to postoperative 2.3 and 57°, respectively. One patient with ankylosing spondylitis had a fair result, 2 patients had good results and the remaining 3 patients had excellent results according to Ogilvie-Harris functional score. There were no surgical complications such as infection, Achilles tendon avulsion or abnormal heel sensation. Conclusion: The endoscopic decompression for Haglund’s disease was demonstrated to have several advantages including low morbidity, allowance of functional rehabilitation, short recovery time and quick sports resumption. However a comparative study is needed to determine the value of endoscopic decompression and particular caution should be exerted for the enthesiopathy.
Abstract
Purpose: Haglund’s disease represents a painful heel caused by mechanically induced inflammation of the retrocalcaneal bursa and insertional Achilles tendinosis may coexist. Traditional open surgery can cause complications such as skin breakdown, painful scar and altered sensation around the heel. Endoscopic treatment offers the advantages that are related to minimally invasive procedure and we evaluate the clinical results and operative techniques of endoscopic decompression of retrocalcaneal space for Haglund’s disease. Materials and Methods: Our retrospective study included seven heels in six consecutive patients for which nonoperative treatment had failed and endoscopic decompression was performed. The mean age was forty-one years (range, 28 to 53 years). All of the patients had typical complaints of inflammation of the retrocalcaneal bursa and Fowler-Philip angle of more than 75° and positive parallel pitch lines were present on the lateral calcaneal radiograph. The endoscopic procedure consists of the resection of inflamed retrocalcaneal bursa and enough bone to prevent impingement of the bursa between the calcaneus and Achilles tendon. All patients were evaluated with radiologic angle, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and Ogilvie-Harris functional score. The mean follow-up was 18 months (range, 15 to 21 months). Results: The mean operation time was 61 minutes (range, 50 to 85 minutes). VAS for pain and Fowler-Philip angle were decreased from preoperative 8.7 and 82° to postoperative 2.3 and 57°, respectively. One patient with ankylosing spondylitis had a fair result, 2 patients had good results and the remaining 3 patients had excellent results according to Ogilvie-Harris functional score. There were no surgical complications such as infection, Achilles tendon avulsion or abnormal heel sensation. Conclusion: The endoscopic decompression for Haglund’s disease was demonstrated to have several advantages including low morbidity, allowance of functional rehabilitation, short recovery time and quick sports resumption. However a comparative study is needed to determine the value of endoscopic decompression and particular caution should be exerted for the enthesiopathy.
참고문헌 (28)
- Angermann P, "Chronic retrocalcaneal bursitis treated by resection of the calcaneus", Foot Ankle, 10, pp.285~287 (1990)
- Fiamengo SA, "Posterior heel pain associated with a calcaneal step and Achilles tendon calcification", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 167, pp.203~211 (1982)
- Fowler A, "Abnormality of the calcaneus as a cause of painful heel. Its diagnosis and operative treatment", Br J Surg, 32, pp.494~498 (1945)
- Haglund P, "Beitrag zur Klinik der Achillessehne", Zeitschr Orthop Chir, 49, pp.49~58 (1928)
- Jerosch J, "Arthroskopische Operationen am oberen Sprunggelenk", Indikationen Technik Ergebnisse Komplikationen Orthopade, 28, pp.538~549 (1999)
- Jerosch J, "Endoscopic release of plantar fasciitis -a benign procedure?", Foot Ankle Int, 21, pp.511~513 (2000)
- Jerosch J, "Endoscopic calcaneoplastyrationale, surgical technique, and early results: a preliminary report", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 11, pp.190~195 (2003)
- Jerosch J, "Endoscopic calcaneoplasty (ECP) as a surgical treatment of Haglund’s syndrome", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 15, pp.927~934 (2007)
- Jerosch J, "Arthroscopic treatment of anterior synovitis of the ankle in athletes", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2, pp.176~181 (1994)
- Jerosch J, "Arthroscopically assisted arthrodesis of the ankle joint", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 115, pp.182~189 (1996)
- Jones DC, "Partial calcaneal osteotomy for retrocalcaneal bursitis", Am J Sports Med, 12, pp.72~73 (1984)
- Keck SW, "Bursitis of the Posterior part of the heel. evaluation of surgical treatment of eighteen patients", J Bone Joint Surg, 47(A), pp.267~273 (1965)
- Kim KC, "Clinical utility of radiographic measurements of insertional Achilles tendinitis with Haglund’s deformity", J Korean Foot Ankle Soc, 9, pp.188~192 (2005)
- Leach RE, "Pathologic hindfoot conditions in the athlete", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 177, pp.116~121 (1983)
- Leitze Z, "Endoscopic decompression of the retrocalcaneal space", J Bone Joint Surg, 85(A), pp.1488~1496 (2003)
- Mann RA, "Surgery of the Foot And Ankle. 6th ed.", pp.847~857 (1993), Mosby Inc
- McGarvey WC, "Causes of heel pain. The rational approach to diagnosis, management and salvage of complications", Foot Ankle Clin, 3, pp.175~187 (1998)
- Nesse E, "Poor results after resection for Haglund’s heel. Analysis of 35 heels in 23 patients after 3 years", Acta Orthop Scand, 65, pp.107~109 (1994)
- Ogilvie-Harris DJ, "Anterior impingement of the ankle treated by arthroscopic removal of bony spurs", J Bone Joint Surg, 75(B), pp.437~440 (1993)
- Ortmann FW, "Endoscopic bony and soft-tissue decompression of the retrocalcaneal space for the treatment of Haglund deformity and retrocalcaneal bursitis", Foot Ankle Int, 28, pp.149~153 (2007)
- Pauker M, "Calcaneal osteotomy for Haglund disease", J Foot Surg, 31, pp.558~589 (1992)
- Pavlov H, "The Haglund syndrome: initial and differential diagnosis", Radiology, 144, pp.83~88 (1982)
- Periman MD, "Enlargement of the entire posterior aspect of the calcaneus: treatment with the Keck and Kelly calcaneal osteotomy", J Foot Surg, 31, pp.424~433 (1992)
- Ruch JA, "Haglund’s disease", J Am Podiatry Assoc, 64, pp.1000~1003 (1974)
- Schneider W, "Haglund’s syndrome: disappointing results following surgery: a clinical and radiographic analysis", Foot Ankle Int, 21, pp.26~30 (2000)
- Stephens MM, "Heel pain: shoes, exertion, and Haglund’s deformity", Phys Sports med, 20, pp.87~95 (1992)
- Taylor GJ, "Prominence of the calcaneus: is operation justified?", Bone Joint Surg, 68(B), pp.467~470 (1986)
- van Dijk CN, "Endoscopic calcaneoplasty", Am J Sports Med, 29, pp.185~189 (2001)