감염된 당뇨병성 족부 병변의 균주 조사 및 항생제 선택
Microbiology and Antibiotic Selection for Diabetic Foot Infections
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To help the empirical antibiotics selection in diabetic foot infection patients, we investigated prevalence of microorganisms and their antibiotics sensitivity results. Materials and Methods: Patients who came to our clinics to treat diabetic foot infections with deep ulceration and were followed up more than 6 months until complete recovery were adopted. From March 2006 to June 2009, there were 140 patients who corresponded with such a inclusion criteria. Wound cultures were done by deep tissue or bone debris at first visit to our clinics. Microorganisms which was documented by wound culture and most susceptible antibiotics by minimum inhibitory concentrations were surveyed retrospectively. Results: Microorganisms were confirmed in 113 cases (80.7%). In the other 27 cases (19.3%), there were no cultured microorganisms. In bacterial growth group, there were 72 cases (63.7%) of gram-positive bacteria and 41 cases (36.3%) of gramnegative bacteria. All of them were aerobic microorganisms and there were no anaerobic microorganisms. Methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen and accounted for 35 cases (31.0%). As other common pathogens, there were Enterobacter cloacae (11 cases, 9.7%), pseudomonas aeruginosa (10 cases, 8.8%), Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (10 cases, 8.8%) and enterococcus faecalis (6 cases, 5.3%), and so on. Common susceptible antibiotics in gram positive microorganism were vancomycin (60 cases, 83.3%), teicoplanin (60 cases, 83.3%), nitrofurantoin (60 cases, 83.3%) and ciprofloxacin (53 cases, 73.6%). In gram negative ones, common susceptible antibiotics were imipenem (35 cases, 85.3%), piperacillin/tazobactam (33 cases, 80.5%) and gentamicin (31 cases, 75.6%). Conclusion: Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in gram positive and enterobacter cloacae in gram negative was the most common pathogen in each group. Ciprofloxacin and gentamicin might be adaptable as a first-line empirical antibiotics in infected diabetic foot patients.
Abstract
Purpose: To help the empirical antibiotics selection in diabetic foot infection patients, we investigated prevalence of microorganisms and their antibiotics sensitivity results. Materials and Methods: Patients who came to our clinics to treat diabetic foot infections with deep ulceration and were followed up more than 6 months until complete recovery were adopted. From March 2006 to June 2009, there were 140 patients who corresponded with such a inclusion criteria. Wound cultures were done by deep tissue or bone debris at first visit to our clinics. Microorganisms which was documented by wound culture and most susceptible antibiotics by minimum inhibitory concentrations were surveyed retrospectively. Results: Microorganisms were confirmed in 113 cases (80.7%). In the other 27 cases (19.3%), there were no cultured microorganisms. In bacterial growth group, there were 72 cases (63.7%) of gram-positive bacteria and 41 cases (36.3%) of gramnegative bacteria. All of them were aerobic microorganisms and there were no anaerobic microorganisms. Methicillin-sensitive staphylococcus aureus was the most common pathogen and accounted for 35 cases (31.0%). As other common pathogens, there were Enterobacter cloacae (11 cases, 9.7%), pseudomonas aeruginosa (10 cases, 8.8%), Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (10 cases, 8.8%) and enterococcus faecalis (6 cases, 5.3%), and so on. Common susceptible antibiotics in gram positive microorganism were vancomycin (60 cases, 83.3%), teicoplanin (60 cases, 83.3%), nitrofurantoin (60 cases, 83.3%) and ciprofloxacin (53 cases, 73.6%). In gram negative ones, common susceptible antibiotics were imipenem (35 cases, 85.3%), piperacillin/tazobactam (33 cases, 80.5%) and gentamicin (31 cases, 75.6%). Conclusion: Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus in gram positive and enterobacter cloacae in gram negative was the most common pathogen in each group. Ciprofloxacin and gentamicin might be adaptable as a first-line empirical antibiotics in infected diabetic foot patients.
참고문헌 (17)
- Abdulrazak A, "Bacteriological study of diabetic foot infections", J Diabetes Complications, 19, pp.138~141 (2005)
- Boulton AJ, "The diabetic foot: a global view", Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 16(1), pp.S2~S5 (2000)
- Boulton AJ, "The global burden of diabetic foot disease", Lancet, 366, pp.1719~1724 (2005)
- Chow I, "Management and prevention of diabetic foot ulcers and infections: a health economic review", Pharmacoeconomics, 26, pp.1019~1035 (2008)
- 정춘희, "우리나라 당뇨병성 족부질환의 현황: 건강보험자료 분석결과", Diabetes and Metabolism Journal, 30(5), pp.372~376 (2006), 대한당뇨병학회
- Cunha BA, "Antibiotic selection for diabetic foot infection: a review", J Foot Ankle Surg, 39, pp.253~257 (2000)
- Game F, "MRSA and osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes", Diabet Med, 21(4), pp.16~19 (2004)
- Han SK, "Microbiology in Diabetic Foot Patients in Kore", J Korean Wound Care Soc, 3, pp.19~23 (2007)
- Hartemann-Heurtier A, "Diabetic foot ulcer and multidrug-resistant organisms: risk factors and impact", Diabet Med, 21, pp.710~715 (2004)
- Lavery LA, "Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort", Diabetes Care, 26, pp.1435~1438 (2003)
- Lipsky BA, "Diagnosing and treating diabetic foot infections", Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 20(1), pp.S56~S64 (2004)
- Lipsky BA, "Empirical therapy for diabetic foot infections: are there clinical clues to guide antibiotic selection?", Clin Microbiol Infect, 13, pp.351~353 (2007)
- Lipsky BA, "Evidence-based antibiotic therapy of diabetic foot infections", FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol, 26, pp.267~272 (1999)
- Raja NS, "Microbiology of diabetic foot infections in a teaching hospital in Malaysia: a retrospective study of 194 cases", J Microbiol Immunol Infect, 40, pp.39~44 (2007)
- Rao N, "Optimising antimicrobial therapy in diabetic foot infections", Drugs, 67, pp.195~214 (2007)
- Setacci C, "Diabetic patients: epidemiology and global impact", J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 50, pp.263~273 (2009)
- Sharma VK, "Common pathogens isolated in foot infection in Bir Hospital", Kathmandu Univ Med J(KUMJ), 4, pp.295~301 (2006)