급성 아킬레스건 파열의 치료 동향: 대한족부족관절학회 회원 설문조사 분석
Current Trends in the Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture: Analysis of the Korean Foot and Ankle Society (KFAS) Member Survey
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study was based on the Korean Foot and Ankle Society (KFAS) member survey and aimed to report the current trends in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) over the past few decades. Materials and Methods: A web-based questionnaire containing 34 questions was sent to all KFAS members in October 2021. The questions were mainly related to the clinical experience and preferred management of patients with AATR. Answers with a prevalence ≥50% of the respondents were considered a tendency. Results: Seventy-one (12.9%) of the 550 members responded to the survey. The male sex ratio in AATR was answered mean 78%, and the most common age groups were 30~40 years (n=49; 69.0%), and 40~50 years (n=37; 52.1%), in that order. The most common seasons for the occurrence of AATR were spring (37 cases; 52.1%) and autumn (27 cases; 38.0%). Also, sports-related rupture had an average occurrence of 76.2%. The most important clinical factor to determine the type of treatment was the history of previous injuries, and 75.9% of respondents started conservative treatment in the 2010s. The most preferred protocol of conservative treatment was an orthosis capable of ankle range of motion after casting (68.5%), and 53.7% ‘satisfied’ and 1.9% ‘very satisfied’ with conservative treatment. The most preferred surgical method was open repair (80.3%), and the Krackow method (60.6%), and 49.3% of treated patients responded ‘satisfied’ and 45.1% ‘very satisfied’ with this treatment. Conclusion: This study gives updated information concerning the current trend of epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of AATR in Korea. Both consensus and variation in the approach to AATR were identified using this survey study. This study may raise the awareness of various possible approaches toward AATR and should be used to further establish a standard protocol for the management of this injury.
Abstract
Purpose: This study was based on the Korean Foot and Ankle Society (KFAS) member survey and aimed to report the current trends in the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of acute Achilles tendon rupture (AATR) over the past few decades. Materials and Methods: A web-based questionnaire containing 34 questions was sent to all KFAS members in October 2021. The questions were mainly related to the clinical experience and preferred management of patients with AATR. Answers with a prevalence ≥50% of the respondents were considered a tendency. Results: Seventy-one (12.9%) of the 550 members responded to the survey. The male sex ratio in AATR was answered mean 78%, and the most common age groups were 30~40 years (n=49; 69.0%), and 40~50 years (n=37; 52.1%), in that order. The most common seasons for the occurrence of AATR were spring (37 cases; 52.1%) and autumn (27 cases; 38.0%). Also, sports-related rupture had an average occurrence of 76.2%. The most important clinical factor to determine the type of treatment was the history of previous injuries, and 75.9% of respondents started conservative treatment in the 2010s. The most preferred protocol of conservative treatment was an orthosis capable of ankle range of motion after casting (68.5%), and 53.7% ‘satisfied’ and 1.9% ‘very satisfied’ with conservative treatment. The most preferred surgical method was open repair (80.3%), and the Krackow method (60.6%), and 49.3% of treated patients responded ‘satisfied’ and 45.1% ‘very satisfied’ with this treatment. Conclusion: This study gives updated information concerning the current trend of epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of AATR in Korea. Both consensus and variation in the approach to AATR were identified using this survey study. This study may raise the awareness of various possible approaches toward AATR and should be used to further establish a standard protocol for the management of this injury.
참고문헌 (21)
- Ganestam A, "Increasing incidence of acute Achilles tendon rupture and a noticeable decline in surgical treatment from 1994 to 2013. A nationwide registry study of 33, 160 patients", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 24, pp.3730~3737 (2016)[DOI]
- Sheth U, "The epidemiology and trends in management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures in Ontario, Canada : a population-based study of 27 607 patients", Bone Joint J, 99-B, pp.78~86 (2017)[DOI]
- Vosseller JT, "Achilles tendon rupture in women", Foot Ankle Int, 34, pp.49~53 (2013)[DOI]
- Saarensilta IA, "Achilles tendon ruptures during summer show the lowest incidence, but exhibit an increased risk of re-rupture", Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 28, pp.3978~3986 (2020)[DOI]
- Guss D, "Acute Achilles tendon rupture : a critical analysis review", JBJS Rev, 3, pp.e2~ (2015)[DOI]
- Uquillas CA, "Everything Achilles : knowledge update and current concepts in management : AAOS exhibit selection", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 97, pp.1187~1195 (2015)[DOI]
- Bergkvist D, "Acute Achilles tendon rupture : a questionnaire follow-up of 487 patients", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 94, pp.1229~1233 (2012)[DOI]
- Soroceanu A, "Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture : a metaanalysis of randomized trials", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 94, pp.2136~2143 (2012)[DOI]
- Khan RJ, "Treatment of acute achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, pp.2202~2210 (2005)[DOI]
- Nilsson-Helander K, "Acute achilles tendon rupture : a randomized, controlled study comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments using validated outcome measures", Am J Sports Med, 38, pp.2186~2193 (2010)[DOI]
- Pajala A, "Augmented compared with nonaugmented surgical repair of a fresh total Achilles tendon rupture. A prospective randomized study", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 91, pp.1092~1100 (2009)[DOI]
- Ochen Y, "Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures : systematic review and meta-analysis", BMJ, 364, pp.k5120~ (2019)[DOI]
- Wilkins R, "Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures : a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials", Am J Sports Med, 40, pp.2154~2160 (2012)[DOI]
- Gatz M, "Open versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture : a meta-analysis study", Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 141, pp.383~401 (2021)[DOI]
- Movin T, "Acute rupture of the Achilles tendon", Foot Ankle Clin, 10, pp.331~356 (2005)[DOI]
- Maffulli N, "Changing incidence of Achilles tendon rupture in Scotland : a 15-year study", Clin J Sport Med, 9, pp.157~160 (1999)[DOI]
- Hong-Gi Park, "Epidemiology of Achilles Tendon Rupture in South Korea: Claims Data of the National Health Insurance Service from 2009 to 2017", Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, 13(4), pp.539~548 (2021), 대한정형외과학회[DOI]
- Willits K, "Operative versus nonoperative treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures : a multicenter randomized trial using accelerated functional rehabilitation", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92, pp.2767~2775 (2010)[DOI]
- Sheth U, "Practice patterns in the care of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: is there an association with level I evidence?", Bone Joint J, 99-B, pp.1629~1636 (2017)[DOI]
- Huttunen TT, "Acute achilles tendon ruptures : incidence of injury and surgery in Sweden between 2001 and 2012", Am J Sports Med, 42, pp.2419~2423 (2014)[DOI]
- Kearney RS, "Achilles tendon rupture rehabilitation : a mixed methods investigation of current practice among orthopaedic surgeons in the United Kingdom", Bone Joint Res, 4, pp.65~69 (2015)[DOI]