지구과학 I 문제 해결 과정에서 나타난 학습유형에 따른 고등학생의 시선 추적 분석
Eye Tracking Analysis for High School Students’ Learning Styles in the Process of Solving on Earth Science I
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to analysis eye tracking for high school students’ learning styles in the process of solving in the behavioral domains of the College Scholastic Ability Test on Earth Science I. The subjects of this study were 50 students from two classes out of 4 classes in E high school in Chungcheong province. Among them, we conducted experiments by randomly sampling 2 students of each type of learning based on the criteria that they had not encountered the problem of Earth Science I from the past two years. The findings indicate that the item correctness rate of divergers, assimilators, convergers, and accommodators were higher in the knowledge domain, application domain, knowledge-understanding domain, and understanding domain. This confirms that there is a difference among the four learning styles in the level of achievement according to the behavioral areas of the assessment questions. The latter finding was that the high eye-share of AOI 2 appeared higher than AOI 1, 3, 4 in the course of solving the problems. This is because the four types of learners pay more careful attention to the AOI 2 area, which is the cue-or-information area of problem solving, that is, the Table, Figure, and Graph area. Therefore, in order to secure the fairness and objectivity of the selection, it is necessary that an equal number of questions of each behavioral domain be selected on the Earth Science Ⅰ Test of the College Scholastic Ability Test in general. Besides, it seems to be necessary that the knowledge, understanding, application, and the behavior area of the inquiry be highly correlated with the AOI 2 area in development of test questions.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to analysis eye tracking for high school students’ learning styles in the process of solving in the behavioral domains of the College Scholastic Ability Test on Earth Science I. The subjects of this study were 50 students from two classes out of 4 classes in E high school in Chungcheong province. Among them, we conducted experiments by randomly sampling 2 students of each type of learning based on the criteria that they had not encountered the problem of Earth Science I from the past two years. The findings indicate that the item correctness rate of divergers, assimilators, convergers, and accommodators were higher in the knowledge domain, application domain, knowledge-understanding domain, and understanding domain. This confirms that there is a difference among the four learning styles in the level of achievement according to the behavioral areas of the assessment questions. The latter finding was that the high eye-share of AOI 2 appeared higher than AOI 1, 3, 4 in the course of solving the problems. This is because the four types of learners pay more careful attention to the AOI 2 area, which is the cue-or-information area of problem solving, that is, the Table, Figure, and Graph area. Therefore, in order to secure the fairness and objectivity of the selection, it is necessary that an equal number of questions of each behavioral domain be selected on the Earth Science Ⅰ Test of the College Scholastic Ability Test in general. Besides, it seems to be necessary that the knowledge, understanding, application, and the behavior area of the inquiry be highly correlated with the AOI 2 area in development of test questions.
참고문헌 (21)
- 서진수, "과학고 학생들의 비구조화된 문제 해결 과정 특성 분석", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 5(1), pp.8~19 (2012), 대한지구과학교육학회
- 채동현, "대학 영재원 영재선발시험의 단계별 연관성에 관한 연구: 창의성의 일반 영역적 관점과 특수 영역적 관점에서", 대한지구과학교육학회지, 8(3), pp.259~266 (2015), 대한지구과학교육학회[DOI]
- 최현동, "과학 교과서의 표를 해석하는 초등교사들의 안구 운동 추적", 초등과학교육, 31(3), pp.358~371 (2012), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 2016학년도 대학수학능력시험 학습방법안내, "한국교육과정평가원", 한국교육과정평가원, ~ (2015)
- "Learning style and pedagogy in post-16learning: A systematic and critical review" (2004)[URL]
- Holmqvist, K, "Eye tracking : A comprehensive guide to methods and measures" (2011), Oxford University Press
- Kim, H, "Effect of web-based science Journal writing on the science-related affective domain of sixth grade students in Korea", International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 11(2-3), pp.147~155 (2016)
- Kim, H, "The development and application of a STEAM program based on traditional Korean culture", Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12(7), pp.1925~1936 (2016)
- Kolb, D. A, "Experimental learning : Experience as the source of learning and development" (1984), Prentice Hall
- Kolb, D. A, "Learning Style Inventory (LSI)" (1985), Hay Resource Direct
- Kolb, D. A, "Learning Style Inventory, Boston, version 3: Technical specifications" (1999), Hay Resource Direct
- Kowler, E, "Eye Movements: The Past 25 Years", Visual Research, 51(13), pp.1457~1483 (2011)
- Liu, C. J, "The Influence of Different Representations on Solving Concentration Problems at Elementary School", Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), pp.621~629 (2011)
- Nulty, D. D, "Transitions in students’ learning style", Students in Higher Education, 21(3), pp.333~345 (1996)
- Pask, G, "Styles and strategies of learning", British Journal of Psychology, 46(2), pp.128~148 (1976)
- Stice, J. E, "Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve students learning", Engineering Education, 77(5), pp.291~296 (1987)
- Tallmadge, G. K, "Relationships among learning styles, instructional method and the nature of learning experience", Journal of Educational Psychology, 60(3), pp.222~230 (1969)
- Tsai, R, "An exploration of the use of Eye-Gaze Tracking to study problem-solving on standardized science assessments", International Journal of Research &Method in Education, 29(2), pp.185~208 (2006)
- Stice, J. E, "Using Kolb’s learning cycle to improve students learning", Engineering Education, 77(5), pp.291~296 (1987)
- Wheeler, R, "An alternative to failure: Teaching reading according to students; perceptual strength", pp.59~63 (1980), Kappa Delta Pi Record
- Weinberg, F. H, "An experimental investigation of the interaction between modality preference and mode of presentation on the instruction of arithmetic concepts to third grade underachiever", doctor, pp.1983