소집단 논의활동을 강조한 과학실험수업이 과학성취도 및 과학적 태도에 미치는 효과
The Effects of Scientific Experimental Classes Emphasized Small Group Argument Activities on Science Achievement and Scientific Attitudes
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to examine what effects the experiment class to stress discussion of small groups in scientific experiment class of the elementary school has on scientific achievement and attitude on the science of the students comparing to the usual scientific experiment class. For that purpose, this study has divided 49 students at the 6th grade of the M elementary school in P City into test groups of 24 students and control groups of 25 students. Classes have been progressed by giving sufficient time to the test groups for discussion by each small groups after experiment while by allowing the control groups to finish the experiment with arrangement of the experiment results. Conclusions of this study include:First, the more familiar the experiment materials are and the easier the experiment procedures are to be operated by the students, the more actively the small group discussion activities have been deployed. It shows that the students need a certain level of background knowledge before experiment for vital discussing activities. Second, it is appeared that the test groups given the scientific experiment class stressing small group discussing activity have significantly high scores comparing to the control groups given the existing scientific experiment class. It shows that the small group discussing activities have effects on promoting understanding of the students on the scientific achievement for the scientific experiment class. Third, it is appeared that the test groups given the scientific experiment class stressing small group discussing activity significantly high scores on attitude about the science comparing to the control groups given the existing scientific experiment class. It is considered that the students could have opportunities to compare their own thoughts with others and to have reflective thought to change their thoughts through the small group discussing activity. As shown above, it shows that the experiment class to stress discussing activities is more effective to increase scientific achievement and attitude about the science than the scientific experiment class to get and arrange the experiment results from the existing experiment classes.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to examine what effects the experiment class to stress discussion of small groups in scientific experiment class of the elementary school has on scientific achievement and attitude on the science of the students comparing to the usual scientific experiment class. For that purpose, this study has divided 49 students at the 6th grade of the M elementary school in P City into test groups of 24 students and control groups of 25 students. Classes have been progressed by giving sufficient time to the test groups for discussion by each small groups after experiment while by allowing the control groups to finish the experiment with arrangement of the experiment results. Conclusions of this study include:First, the more familiar the experiment materials are and the easier the experiment procedures are to be operated by the students, the more actively the small group discussion activities have been deployed. It shows that the students need a certain level of background knowledge before experiment for vital discussing activities. Second, it is appeared that the test groups given the scientific experiment class stressing small group discussing activity have significantly high scores comparing to the control groups given the existing scientific experiment class. It shows that the small group discussing activities have effects on promoting understanding of the students on the scientific achievement for the scientific experiment class. Third, it is appeared that the test groups given the scientific experiment class stressing small group discussing activity significantly high scores on attitude about the science comparing to the control groups given the existing scientific experiment class. It is considered that the students could have opportunities to compare their own thoughts with others and to have reflective thought to change their thoughts through the small group discussing activity. As shown above, it shows that the experiment class to stress discussing activities is more effective to increase scientific achievement and attitude about the science than the scientific experiment class to get and arrange the experiment results from the existing experiment classes.
참고문헌 (32)
- 강묘정, "논의과정 활동이 과학글쓰기 능력 및 과학적 사고력에 미치는 영향", 석사, pp.2010
- 강순민, "과학적 맥락의 논의 과제 해결 과정에서 나타나는 논의과정 요소의 특성", 박사, pp.2004
- 김미진, "토의식 수업에서 과학 글쓰기가 고등학생의 과학에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향", 석사, 물리교육, pp.2011
- 김희경, "7 차 교육과정에 따른 중학교 과학 교과서 물리단원 실험의 특징", 새물리, 47(6), pp.387~394 (2003), 한국물리학회
- 남정희, "논의가 강조된 일반화학실험이 예비교사의 글쓰기 능력 및 화학개념 이해에 미치는 효과", 한국과학교육학회지, 31(8), pp.1077~1091 (2011), 한국과학교육학회
- 맹애영, "생물 관찰활동에서의 교사의 역할과 유아의 과학과정 기술의 변화에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2005
- 서봉희, "초등학생들의 과학논의과정에서 사용되는 논의요소의 특성에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2006
- 오진아, "지구과학 MBL 수업의 과학 탐구와 논의적 의사소통에 관한 사례 연구", 한국지구과학회지, 29(2), pp.189~203 (2008), 한국지구과학회
- 이건의, "초등과학에서 소집단 탐구 기법이 과학적 탐구능력 및 과학에 대한 태도에 미치는 효과", 석사, pp.2010
- 이경훈, "LISREL을 이용한 과학에서의 태도에 관한 구조방정식 모델의 구축", 박사, pp.1996
- 초등학교 교과용 도서 체제 개선 연구(Ⅳ)-과학-, "이양락", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.연구보고 RRC2002-12-2 (2002)
- 이용섭, "초등과학과 교재연구 및 지도법-지구우주분야" (2010), 한울기획
- 임재웅, "과학 실험 수업에 대한 초등학생의인식과 태도", 과학교육연구 (2002)
- 임희준, "초등학교 과학 실험의 목적과 학습결과에 대한 교사와 학생의 인식", 과학교육논총, 19, pp.221~232 (2006)
- 정은영, "초등학교 과학과 실험 및 관찰 수업 사례에서 나타난 수업의 문제점 : 도시 지역의 수업 사례를 중심으로", 초등과학교육, 23(4), pp.287~286 (2004), 한국초등과학교육학회
- 정지숙, "과학실험수업에서 소집단 토론의 시기가 과학 탐구 수행 능력과 언어적 상호작용에 미치는 효과", 박사, pp.2005
- 최성봉, "지구과학의 능동적 소집단 협력학습이 과학 영재아에 미치는 효과", 박사, pp.2008
- 최정임, "문제해결과 웹기반 교육, In 웹기반 교육" (1999), 교육과학사
- 초등학교 과학과 교수.학습 방법과 자료개발, "홍미영", 한국교육과정평가원, ~, pp.RRC2002-18 (2002)
- Driver, R., "the norms of scientific argumentation in classroom", Science Education, 84(3), pp.287~312 (2000)
- Duschl, R., "Making the nature of science explicit, In Improving science education: The contribution of research", pp.187~206 (2000), Open University Press
- Erduran, S., "The role of argumentation in developing scientific literacy, In Research and the Quality of Science Education", pp.381~394 (2005), Springer
- Hofstein, A., "The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century", Science Education, 88(1), pp.28~54 (2004)
- Lemke, J. L., "Talking science: Language, learning, and values" (1990), Abex Publishing Corporation
- Lo, J., "Learning opportunities and negotiating social norms in mathematics class discussion", Educational Studies in Mathematics, 27(2), pp.145~164 (1994)
- Meyer, J. C., "Consensually driven explanation in science teaching", Science Education, 81(2), pp.173~192 (1997)
- National Research Council, "National science education standards" (1996), National Academy Press
- Newton, P., "The place of argumentation in the pedagogy of school science", International Journal of Science Education, 21, pp.553~576 (1999)
- Norris, S, "How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy", Science Education, 87, pp.224~240 (2003)
- Osborne, L., "Enhancing the quality of argumentation in science school", Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(10), pp.994~1020 (2004)
- Tobin, K., "Research on science laboratory activities; In pursuit of better questions and answers to improve learning", School Science and Mathematics, 90(5), pp.403~418 (1990)
- Tobin, K, "Gender related differences in science activities", Science Education, 71(1), pp.91~103 (1987)