본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Consumer preferences for personal 3D printing technology: The case in South Korea

이현주|허성윤|김준상
한국혁신학회|2022.02|한국혁신학회지 (Innovation studies)|제17권 제1호|pp. 207-231

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

Willingness to payAdditive manufacturingThree-dimensional printingChoice experimentMixed logit modelMarket simulation

초록

The innovative manufacturing technique of 3D printing has attracted attention because of a growing need for increased flexibility and the technology’s ability to provide economic low volume production. Identifying the factors influencing consumer adoption of 3D printing technology could cement the technology’s success. This research analyzes consumers’ preferences for personal 3D printers and presents a market simulation of their adoption rate. A choice experiment obtains stated preference data analyzed by using a mixed logit model. The results show that the major buyers of personal 3D printers are male consumers between 20 and 29 years of age. Consumers consider the purchase price, the possibility of an error occurring, and the possible printing items of a 3D printer as the top three important attributes. Moreover, consumers are willing to pay an additional 76,852 Korean won for the personal 3D printer that produces the high quality items, which is the highest amount among other attributes. Market simulation results demonstrate that consumer adoption rates increase from 12.28% to 29.12% for household items, 13.23% to 24.98% for fashion items, and 12.19% to 26.57% for food items as the purchase price decreases from 1.5 to 0.1 million Korean won.

Abstract

The innovative manufacturing technique of 3D printing has attracted attention because of a growing need for increased flexibility and the technology’s ability to provide economic low volume production. Identifying the factors influencing consumer adoption of 3D printing technology could cement the technology’s success. This research analyzes consumers’ preferences for personal 3D printers and presents a market simulation of their adoption rate. A choice experiment obtains stated preference data analyzed by using a mixed logit model. The results show that the major buyers of personal 3D printers are male consumers between 20 and 29 years of age. Consumers consider the purchase price, the possibility of an error occurring, and the possible printing items of a 3D printer as the top three important attributes. Moreover, consumers are willing to pay an additional 76,852 Korean won for the personal 3D printer that produces the high quality items, which is the highest amount among other attributes. Market simulation results demonstrate that consumer adoption rates increase from 12.28% to 29.12% for household items, 13.23% to 24.98% for fashion items, and 12.19% to 26.57% for food items as the purchase price decreases from 1.5 to 0.1 million Korean won.

참고문헌 (65)

  1. Accenture, "Making business sense of 3D printing", ~ (2013)
  2. Adamowicz, W., "Stated preference approaches for measuring passive use values : Choice experiments and contingent valuation", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(1), pp.64~75 (1998)
  3. ASTM Standard, "Standard terminology for additive manufacturing technologies 10. 04", ~ (2012)
  4. Atos, "3D Printing, ascent thought leadership from Atos white paper" (2014)
  5. Bak, D., "Rapid prototyping or rapid production? 3D printing processes move industry towards the latter", Assembly Automation, 23(4), pp.340~345 (2003)
  6. Additive manufacturing: A layered revolution, "Barneveld J.", European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, ~, pp.Report No. WPFOMEEF18002 (2017)
  7. Berenschot, "Successful business models for 3D printing: seizing opportunities with game changing technology", ~ (2014)
  8. Berman, B., "3-D printing : the new industrial revolution", Business Horizons, 55, pp.155~162 (2012)
  9. Birtchnell, T., "3D, SF and the future", Futures, 50, pp.25~34 (2013)
  10. Birtchnell, T., "Fabricating futures and the movement of objects", Mobilities, 8(3), pp.388~405 (2013)
  11. Bogue, R., "3D printing: The dawn of a new era in manufacturing?", Assembly Automation, 33(4), pp.307~311 (2013)
  12. Boxall, P. C., "A comparison of stated preference methods for environmental valuation", Ecological Economics, 18(3), pp.243~253 (1996)
  13. Bradshaw, S., "The intellectual property implications of low-cost 3D printing", SCRIPTed, 7(1), pp.5~31 (2010)
  14. Bravi, L., "Attitudes and behaviours of Italian 3D prosumer in the era of additive manufacturing", Procedia Manufacturing, 13, pp.980~986 (2017)
  15. Bredt, J. F., "New life for 3D printing", R&D Management, 54(2), pp.12~13 (2012)
  16. Brunner, T. A., "Consumers’ attitudes and change of attitude toward 3D-printed food", Food Quality and Preference, 68, pp.389~396 (2018)
  17. Campbell, I., "Additive manufacturing : rapid prototyping comes of age", Rapid Prototyping Journal, 18(4), pp.255~258 (2012)
  18. Christopher, M., "The supply chain becomes the demand chain", Journal of Business Logistics, 35(1), pp.29~35 (2014)
  19. "Obama's speech highlights rise of 3-D printing" (2013)[URL]
  20. Computer Science Corporation, "3D printing and the future of manufacturing, CSC leading edge forum:technology program", ~ (2012)
  21. de Jong, J. P. J., "Innovation lessons from 3-D printing", MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2), pp.43~52 (2013)
  22. "INFOGRAPHIC: ROBO 3D Announces Results of the Big 3D Printing Consumer Survey" (2014)[URL]
  23. Garrett, B., "3D printing : New economic paradigms and strategic shifts", Global Policy, 5(1), pp.70~75 (2014)
  24. "The Top 10 Strategic Technology Trends for 2014" (2014)[URL]
  25. Gibbs, B., "Preparing for 3D printing: When and how?", Manufacturing Engineering, 151(4), pp.112~ (2013)
  26. "The dark side of 3D printing: 10 things to watch" (2014)[URL]
  27. Green, P. E., "Conjoint analysis in consumer research : Issues and outlook", Journal of Consumer Research, 5(2), pp.103~123 (1978)
  28. Green, P. E., "Conjoint analysis in marketing : New developments with implications for research and practice", Journal of Marketing, 54(4), pp.3~19 (1990)
  29. Gross, B. C., "Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences", Analytical Chemistry, 86, pp.3240~3253 (2014)
  30. Huang, S. H., "Additive manufacturing and its societal impact : A literature review", The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67, pp.1191~1203 (2013)
  31. 3D Printing Industry Promotion Basic Plan (2017~2019), "Joint Ministries", ~ (2016)
  32. The Second 3D Printing Industry Promotion Basic Plan (2020~2022), "Joint Ministries", ~ (2020)
  33. Khamhong, P., "Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)-based criteria analysis for 3D printer selection in additive manufacturing", 2019 Research, Invention, and Innovation Congress (RI2C), pp.1~5 (2019), IEEE Press
  34. "3D Printers: a fad or the future?" (2014)[URL]
  35. Li, X., "A Design Case Study: 3D Printer Software Interface Design Based on Home Users Preferences Knowledge", Proceedings of the Design Society: International Conference on Engineering Design, 1(1), pp.639~648 (2019), Cambridge University Press
  36. Lupton, D., ""I can’t get past the fact that it is printed" : Consumer attitudes to 3D printed food", Food, Culture & Society, 21(3), pp.402~418 (2018)
  37. Manstan, T., "Consumers’ attitudes towards and acceptance of 3D printed foods in comparison with conventional food products", International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55, pp.323~331 (2020)
  38. Marcoux, J., "Three dimensional printing: An introduction for information professionals", ICDS 2012: The sixth international conference on digital society, pp.54~58 (2012)
  39. MaRS, "Layer-by-layer: Opportunities in 3D printing", MaRS Market Insights, ~ (2013)
  40. Mauldin Economics, "The next big thing: 3D printing bigger than the internet?, Mauldin Economics Yield Shark", ~ (2013)
  41. McFadden, D., "Frontiers of Econometrics" (1973), Academic Press
  42. Mellor, S., "Additive manufacturing: A framework for implementation", International Journal of Production Economics, 149, pp.194~201 (2014)
  43. "10 Breakthrough technologies 2013" (2013)[URL]
  44. "Results from 3D printing survey 2013/chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/viewer.html?pdfurl=" (2013)[URL]
  45. 2020 3D Printing Industry Survey, "National IT Industry Promotion Agency", ~ (2021)
  46. Nurhayati, A., "Prioritizing material selection criteria for additive manufacturing (3D printing) filament using conjoint analysis", Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2020, pp.53~54 (2020)
  47. Formulating attributes and levels in conjoint analysis, "Orme, B.", Sawtooth Software, ~ (2002)
  48. Pearce, J.M., "3-D printing of open source appropriate technologies for self-directed sustainable development", Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(4), pp.17~29 (2010)
  49. Perry, A., "3D-printed apparel and 3D-printer : Exploring advantages, concerns, and purchases", International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11(1), pp.95~103 (2018)
  50. Petrick, I. J., "3D printing disrupts manufacturing : How economies of one create new rules of competition", Research-Technology Management, 56(6), pp.12~16 (2013)
  51. Potstada, M., "The role of context in science fiction prototyping : The digital industrial revolution", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 84, pp.101~114 (2014)
  52. PriceWaterhouseCoopers, "3D printing and the new shape of industrial manufacturing", ~ (2014)
  53. Reade, L., "3D print : shaping the future", Chemistry & Industry, 8, pp.14~15 (2011)
  54. Rosen, D., "Design for additive manufacturing : Past, present, and future directions", Journal of Mechanical Design, 136(9), pp.090301~ (2014)
  55. Saveker, A., "Personal 3D Printers Market" (2021), Allied Market Research
  56. Schubert, C., "Innovations in 3D printing : A 3D overview from optics to organs", British Journal of Ophthalmology, 98, pp.159~161 (2014)
  57. Shahrubudin, N., "An overview on 3D printing technology : Technological, materials, and applications", Procedia Manufacturing, 35, pp.1286~1296 (2019)
  58. A third industrial revolution, in: Special report: manufacturing and innovation, "The Economist", ~ (2012)
  59. "3D printers: Review and comparisons" (2014)[URL]
  60. Train, K. E., "Discrete choice methods with simulation" (2009), Cambridge University Press
  61. Train, K., "Applications of simulation methods in environmental and resource economics" (2005), Springer
  62. Wittbrodt, B.T., "Life-cycle economic analysis of distributed manufacturing with open-source 3-D printers", Mechatronics, 23, pp.713~726 (2013)
  63. Wohlers Report 2019, "Wohlers Associate", ~ (2019)
  64. "The top 10 emerging technologies for 2013" (2013)[URL]
  65. Top 10 Emerging Technologies of 2021: Insight Report, "World Economic Forum", World Economic Forum, ~ (2021)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)

에너지 R&D 주제 키워드 및 연구기관 네트워크 특성 분석김태윤, 조정래pp. 1-27연구개발 투자가 지식재산권에 미치는 영향 : 박사연구원 비중과 검사장비 수준의 상호효과박종훈, 김윤진, 김서연, 김창수pp. 29-59An Impact of Corporate Venture Capital Investment on the Value of Global Fintech Startups배상철pp. 61-83인공지능(AI) 기술도입에 따른 산업별 노동수요변화 탐색심동녘, 고동환pp. 85-103BWS 방법을 이용한 보건의료문제 해결 우선순위 선호도 분석정기철pp. 105-122
원문 보기