본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

보건용 마스크 초미세먼지 제거 성능 평가 및 재사용 연구

Performance and reusability of certified and uncertified face masks

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

In this study, performance (particle removal efficiency and breathing resistance) of several commercially available face masks (electrostatic filter masks (KF80 certified), a nanofiber filter mask (KF80 certified), and an uncertified mask) with their filter structure and composition were evaluated. Also, effects of relative humidity (RH) of incoming air, water and alcohol exposure, and reusability on performance of face masks were examined. Monodisperse and polydisperse sodium chloride particles were used as test aerosols. Except the uncertified mask filter, PM2.5 removal efficiency was found to be higher than 90%, and the nanofiber filter mask had the highest quality factor due to the low pressure drop and high removal efficiency (nanofibers were arranged in a densely packed pore structure and contained a significant amount of fluorine in addition to carbon and oxygen). In the case of the KF80 certified mask, the removal efficiency was little affected when the RH of incoming air increased. When the mask filters were soaked in water, the removal efficiency of mask filters was degraded. In particular, the uncertified mask filter showed the highest removal efficiency degradation (26%). When the mask was soaked in alcohol, the removal efficiency also decreased with the greater degree than the water soaking case. The nanofiber mask filter showed the strongest resistance to alcohol exposure among tested mask filters. During evaluation of reusability of masks in real life, the removal efficiency of certified mask filter was less than 4% for 5 consecutive days (2 hours per day), while the removal efficiency of uncertified mask filter significantly decreased by 30% after 5 days.

Abstract

In this study, performance (particle removal efficiency and breathing resistance) of several commercially available face masks (electrostatic filter masks (KF80 certified), a nanofiber filter mask (KF80 certified), and an uncertified mask) with their filter structure and composition were evaluated. Also, effects of relative humidity (RH) of incoming air, water and alcohol exposure, and reusability on performance of face masks were examined. Monodisperse and polydisperse sodium chloride particles were used as test aerosols. Except the uncertified mask filter, PM2.5 removal efficiency was found to be higher than 90%, and the nanofiber filter mask had the highest quality factor due to the low pressure drop and high removal efficiency (nanofibers were arranged in a densely packed pore structure and contained a significant amount of fluorine in addition to carbon and oxygen). In the case of the KF80 certified mask, the removal efficiency was little affected when the RH of incoming air increased. When the mask filters were soaked in water, the removal efficiency of mask filters was degraded. In particular, the uncertified mask filter showed the highest removal efficiency degradation (26%). When the mask was soaked in alcohol, the removal efficiency also decreased with the greater degree than the water soaking case. The nanofiber mask filter showed the strongest resistance to alcohol exposure among tested mask filters. During evaluation of reusability of masks in real life, the removal efficiency of certified mask filter was less than 4% for 5 consecutive days (2 hours per day), while the removal efficiency of uncertified mask filter significantly decreased by 30% after 5 days.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Adhikari, A., "Field Evaluation of N95 Filtering Facepiece Respirators on Construction Jobsites for Protection against Airborne Ultrafine Particles", International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 15(9), pp.1958~ (2018)
  2. Alderman, S. L., "Evaluation of the Effect of Media Velocity on Filter Efficiency and Most Penetrating Particle Size of Nuclear Grade High-Efficiency Particulate Air Filters", Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 5, pp.713~720 (2008)
  3. Balazy, A., "Manikin-Based Performance Evaluation of N95 Filtering-Facepiece Respirators Challenged with Nanoparticles", Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 50(3), pp.259~269 (2006)
  4. Bollinger, N. J., "NIOSH Guide to industrial respiratory protection", ~ (1987)
  5. Cherrie, J. W., "Effectiveness of face masks used to protect Beijing residents against particulate air pollution", Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 75(6), pp.446~452 (2018)
  6. Cho, H. -W., "Comparison of pressure drop and filtration efficiency of particulate respirators using welding fumes and sodium chloride", Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 55(6), pp.666~680 (2011)
  7. 조진균, "건축물 미세먼지 저감을 위한 실외유입과 실내발생의 경로 및 대응제품의 성능기준 조사연구", 설비공학 논문집, 31(7), pp.332~341 (2019), 대한설비공학회[DOI]
  8. Air Quality Index: A guide to air quality and your health, "Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)", ~ (2009)
  9. Eshbaugh, J. P., "N95 and P100 respirator filter efficiency under high constant and cyclic flow", Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 6(1), pp.52~61 (2008)
  10. Huang, S. -H., "Factors affecting filter penetration and quality factor of particulate respirators", Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 13(1), pp.162~171 (2013)
  11. Ikezaki, K., "Effect of charging state of particles on electrets", Journal of Electrostatics, 35, pp.41~46 (1995)
  12. Janssen, L., "Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) respiratory protection handbook" (2018)
  13. Jung, C. H., "Theoretical study for the most penetrating particle size of dust-loaded fiber filters", Separation and Purification Technology, 166, pp.248~252 (2013)
  14. Kelly, W., "Measurement of particle density by inertial classification of differential mobility analyzer–generated monodisperse aerosols", Aerosol Science and Technology, 17(3), pp.199~212 (1992)
  15. Langrish, J. P., "Beneficial cardiovascular effects of reducing exposure to particulate air pollution with a simple facemask", Particle and Fibre Toxicology, 6, pp.8~ (2009)
  16. Li, L., "Evaluation of filter media for paticle number, surface area and mass penetrations", Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 56(5), pp.581~594 (2012)
  17. Lolla, D., "Fabrication, polarization of electrospun polyvinylidene fluoride electret fibers and effect on capturing nanoscale solid aerosols", Materials, 9(8), pp.671~ (2016)
  18. Łowkis, B., "Electret properties of polypropylene fabrics", Journal of Electrostatics, 51, pp.232~238 (2001)
  19. Martin, S. B., "Electrostatic Respirator Filter Media : Filter Efficiency and Most Penetrating Particle Size Effects", Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 15(8), pp.609~617 (2000)
  20. Miguel, A., "Effect of air humidity on the evolution of permeability and performance of a fibrous filter during loading with hygroscopic and non-hygroscopic particles", Journal of Aerosol Science, 34(6), pp.783~799 (2003)
  21. Mostofi, R., "Investigation of potential affecting factors on performance of N95 respirator", Journal of the International Society for Respiratory Protection, 28(1), pp.26~39 (2011)
  22. Motyl, E., "Effect of air humidity on charge decay and lifetime of PP electret nonwovens", Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe, 14(5), pp.59~ (2006)
  23. Newnum, J. D., "The effects of relative humidity on respirator performance", MS, pp.2010
  24. National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation (NIFDS), "Guideline and standards for health masks", ~ (2017)
  25. Ramirez, J. A., "Evaluation of particle penetration and breathing resistance of N95 filtering face-piece respirators and uncertified dust masks", PhD, pp.2015
  26. Rengasamy, A., "Respiratory protection against bioaerosols : literature review and research needs", American Journal of Infection Control, 32(6), pp.345~354 (2004)
  27. Rengasamy, S., "Nanoparticle filtration performance of filtering facepiece respirators and canister", cartridge filters, 2013, pp.10(9), 519~525
  28. Rengasamy, S., "Comparison of nanoparticle filtration performance of NIOSH-approved and CE-marked particulate filtering facepiece respirators", Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 53(2), pp.117~128 (2009)
  29. Roberge, R. J., "Effect of exhaled moisture on breathing resistance of N95 filtering facepiece respirators", Annals of Occupational Hygiene, 54(6), pp.671~677 (2010)
  30. National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health(NIOSH), "Determination of particulate filter penetration to test against solid particulates for negative pressure, air-purifying respirators standard testing procedure (STP)", ~ (2005)
  31. Shaffer, R. E., "Respiratory protection against airborne nanoparticles : a review", Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 11(7), pp.1661~ (2009)
  32. Wang, S., "Electret polyvinylidene fluoride nanofibers hybridized by polytetrafluoroethylene nanoparticles for high-efficiency air filtration", ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces, 8(36), pp.23985~23994 (2016)
  33. Wang, S. C., "Scanning electrical mobility spectrometer", Aerosol Science and Technology, 13(2), pp.230~240 (1990)
  34. 양현종, "미세먼지", 황사 건강피해 예방 및 권고지침: 천식, 2015, pp.58(11), 1034~1043[DOI]
  35. Yang, S., "Filtration characteristics of a fibrous filter pretreated with anionic surfactants for monodisperse solid aerosols", Journal of Aerosol Science, 36(4), pp.419~437 (2005)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)