한국문학사 또는 한국 현대시와 정동(affect) 담론의 양태들 - 주체화, 운동, 윤리학

Abstract

‘Affect(Affectus)’ is in many ways synonymous with force of encounter. Affect is born in in-between-ness and resides as accumulative beside-ness. Affect can be understood then as gradient of bodily capacity-a supple incrementalism of ever-modulating force-relations-that rises and falls not only along various rhythms and modalities of encounter but also through the troughs and sieves of sensation and sensibility.(<The Affect Theory Reader> 2010) ‘Affection(Affectio)’ is relation to the change. Spinoza and Deleuze says, Affection is the change, affect is continuous movement and the passage. But this brillant definition of the affect theory do not make explanation sufficiently it to us. What is ‘affect-affection’? This study focuses to examine the present of affect-affection theory in Korean modern literature, especially Korean poem Why do korean literary critic pay attention to affect theory despite its obscurity? Why do it is admitted to major discussion of Korean literary-poem studies. The reason of the interest to this theory can be suggested in two sides. One side is derived from the fact that the affect theory is regarded as a alternative practice theory. It is, so to speak, ‘ethics’. On the other side, it is constitute to Korean poetic theory which is relation to emotion, subject, image. Especially affect theory is regarded as image of non-representation. this image is the essence of the poem. On the other hand, this article study translation dispute about ‘affect-affection’ in Korean literary discussion. Because this theory is very closely connected with the problem of translation.