근대 전환기 고전소설의 대응 양상과 그 의미-박건회 편집 및 개작 소설을 중심으로
The Transitional Aspects in Park Keon Hoe's Adaptations in 1910s-1920s
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Park Keon Hoe is one of the most active persons in the publishing of classic novels in the 1910s. Accordingly, through him, we can see the meanings and limitations of classic novels in cultural history during his days, which were a transitional period of Korean history. Park Keon Hoe published a total of around 50 novels. The novels published by him were mostly popular works among readers in the Chosun Dynasty. However, he published them in printed books by applying a unique editing method. This was advantageous in that more information could be conveyed to readers. Many of books published by him were stories and Chinese novels. He did not publish important works including novels related to Pansori. This fact suggests that his efforts were concentrated on the delivery of edificatory values and his activities were deeply influenced by Chinese culture. A meaning of Park Keon Hoe’s publishing activities is that he tried to find a contact point between print media and the elements of oral culture. Moreover, he took notice of new classes of readers brought by the development of printing technology and the mass distribution of books, and rediscovered the existence of the readers. Despite his efforts as such, however, readers’ response was not as high as expected probably because he adhered to his cultural background.
Abstract
Park Keon Hoe is one of the most active persons in the publishing of classic novels in the 1910s. Accordingly, through him, we can see the meanings and limitations of classic novels in cultural history during his days, which were a transitional period of Korean history. Park Keon Hoe published a total of around 50 novels. The novels published by him were mostly popular works among readers in the Chosun Dynasty. However, he published them in printed books by applying a unique editing method. This was advantageous in that more information could be conveyed to readers. Many of books published by him were stories and Chinese novels. He did not publish important works including novels related to Pansori. This fact suggests that his efforts were concentrated on the delivery of edificatory values and his activities were deeply influenced by Chinese culture. A meaning of Park Keon Hoe’s publishing activities is that he tried to find a contact point between print media and the elements of oral culture. Moreover, he took notice of new classes of readers brought by the development of printing technology and the mass distribution of books, and rediscovered the existence of the readers. Despite his efforts as such, however, readers’ response was not as high as expected probably because he adhered to his cultural background.
참고문헌 (17)
- "《동아일보》", ~
- "《매일신보》", ~
- "《별건곤》", ~
- "《삼천리》", ~
- 이은숙, "신작구소설연구" (2000), 국학자료원
- 이창헌, "경판방각소설 판본연구" (2000), 태학사
- 장효현, "한국고전소설사연구" (2002), 고려대 출판부
- 조희웅, "고전소설작품연구총람" (2000), 집문당
- 천정환, "근대의 책읽기" (2003), 푸른역사
- 최운식, "한국고소설 연구 3판" (1999), 보고사
- 월터 J.옹, "구술문화와 문자문화" (2000), 문예출판사
- 권순긍, "1910년대 활자본 고소설 연구" (1991), 성균관대 대학원
- 류준경, "독서층의 새로운 지평, 방각본과 신활자본", 한문고전연구, 13, pp.271~302 (2006), 한국한문고전학회
- 신효선, "형산백옥 연구" (2006), 교원대 대학원
- 유춘동, "금향정기의 연원과 이본 연구" (2002), 연세대 대학원
- 이주영, "구활자본 고전소설의 간행과 유통에 관한 연구" (1997), 서울대 대학원
- 최호석, "지송욱과 신구서림", 고소설연구, 19, pp.255~282 (2005), 한국고소설학회
