본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

中美企业所得税比较研究

A Comparative Study of the Corporate Income Tax between China and the United States

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

随着中国的经济发展,中美两国在经贸投资、文化和人力交流等方面都得到了快速发展。由于中美两个国家的社会结构,经济体制,政治文化制度等方面都存在较大的差异,研究和了解两国的经济制度的差异,有利于两国之间经济交流的顺利发展。而税制在任何一个国家的经济制度中都占有重要的地位,它显示着一个国家对其经济的支持程度,因此研究经济制度的差异不可避免地要研究两国税制。 本论文通过对中美企业所得税的介绍和对比,分析中美两国企业所得税制的差异,指出中国企业所得税制的不足,进而为中国企业所得税税制的完善和改革提出了建设性的建议。 我们通过分析发现,最明显的差别是美国企业所得税对于累积盈余税和代替最低限税的相关规定.代替最低限税是为了减少纳税人进行过度避税的可能性。代替最低限税试图去保证税收优惠中获益的纳税人缴纳必要的税金。累积盈余税是惩罚性税收(Penalty Tax),要求企业如果累积利润超过一定的金额就应缴纳附加税,如果充分的发放股息则不要缴纳此附加税。 我们建议为了税收公平与社会资源再分配,中国企业所得税制度需要进一步改善,引入累积盈余税和代替最低限税制度。

Abstract

With the economic development of China, it has achieved rapid development with USA in trade, investment, culture and human resources exchange. Due to huge difference in the social structure, economic system as well as political and cultural systems between these two countries, the research and understanding of the difference in the economic system is beneficial to the successful economic exchange. As we know, tax system plays an important role in the economic system of all countries and it represents a country's level of support to its economy. Thus,we inevitably have to study the tax systems of the two countries in order to better understand the difference in their economic systems. This paper analyzes the difference in China's and U.S.A.'s enterprise income tax systems through introduction and comparison. It points out the shortcomings in China's enterprise income tax system, giving constructive suggestions on the improvement and reform of the income tax system. Through the analysis, we have found that the most obvious difference lies in the relevant provisions on accumulated earnings tax and alternative minimum tax. Alternative minimum tax is to reduce the probability of excessive tax avoidance. It attempts to ensure that individuals and corporations that benefit from certain exclusions, deductions, or credits pay at least a minimum amount of tax. Accumulated earnings tax is a penalty tax, requiring enterprises to pay additional tax when accumulated earnings exceed a certain amount. No such additional tax needs to be paid if the earnings are paid out to investors in form of dividends.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 纪建华, "中美企业所得税法比较研究", 财会学习, pp.63~65 (2011)
  2. 刘 蓉, "宪政视角下的税制改革研究" (2008), 法律出版社
  3. 孙启刚, "中美所得税抵免制度之比较分析", 硕士, pp.2009
  4. 杨盛军, "论税收正义——兼论中国遗产税开征的道德理由", 博士, pp.2010
  5. 茹文娟, "中美税收制度的比较与启示", 税务论坛, pp.21~23 (2012)
  6. 吴联生, "“先征后返”、公司税负与税收政策的有效性", 中国社会科学, pp.61~205 (2007)
  7. 王 璐, "中美跨国经营的企业所得税纳税筹划研究", 硕士, pp.2014
  8. 王志强, "中国上市公司债务政策的实证研究", 厦门大学学报, pp.18~25 (2006)
  9. 贠荣莹, "中美企业所得税汇算清缴比较研究", 商业会计, pp.29~30 (2013)
  10. 曹书军, "企业实际所得税率影响因素及其稳定性研究", 财经论丛, pp.30~36 (2008)
  11. 钟晖, "税收征管制度的国际比较与借鉴一兼论我国税收征管制度改革与完善", 硕士, pp.2006
  12. 陈 丹, "论税收正义一基于宪法学角度的省察" (2010), 法律出版社
  13. 肖 怡, "中美税制的差异.:基于制度视角的比较研究", 硕士, pp.2011
  14. 彭培鑫, "两税合并对我国上市公司所得税负担的影响", 西南科技大学学报, pp.13~18 (2010)
  15. Gupta,S., "Determinants of the Variability in Corporate Effective Tax Rates :Evidence from Longitudinal Data", Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 16, pp.1~34 (1997)
  16. Mirrlees, J. A., "Optimal Tax Theory:A Synthesis", Journal of Public Economics, 6 (1976)
  17. Omer, T. C., "Measurement of Effective Corporate Tax Rates Using Financial Statement Information", Journal of the American Taxation Association, 13(Spring), pp.57~72 (1991)
  18. Shevlin,T., "The Corporate Tax Comeback in 1987’ Some Further Evidence", The Journal of the American Taxation Association, 14, pp.58~79 (1992)
  19. Siegfried. J., "Effective Average U.S. Corporation Income Tax Rates", National Tax Journal, 27, pp.245~259 (1974)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (4건)