중소 제조기업의 경쟁력 강화를 위한 제조AI 핵심 정책과제 도출에 관한 연구
Discovering Essential AI-based Manufacturing Policy Issues for Competitive Reinforcement of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises†
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to derive major policies that domestic small and medium-sized manufacturing companies should consider to maximize productivity and quality improvement by utilizing manufacturing data and AI, and to find priorities and implications. Methods: In this study, domestic and international issues and literature review by country were conducted to derive major considerations such as manufacturing AI technology, manufacturing AI talent, manufacturing AI data and manufacturing AI ecosystem. Additionally, the questionnaire survey targeting 46 experts of manufacturing data and AI industry were conducted. Finally, the major considerations and detailed factors importance were derived by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Results: As a result of the study, it was found that 'manufacturing AI technology', 'manufacturing AI talent', 'manufacturing AI data', and 'manufacturing AI ecosystem' exist as key considerations for domestic manufacturing AI. After empirical analysis, the importance of the four key considerations was found to be 'manufacturing AI ecosystem (0.272)', 'manufacturing AI data (0.265)', 'manufacturing AI technology (0.233)', and 'manufacturing AI talent (0.230)'. The importance of the derived four viewpoints is maintained at a similar level. In addition, looking at the detailed variables with the highest importance for each of the four perspectives, ‘Best Practice’, ‘manufacturing data quality management regime, ‘manufacturing data collection infrastructure’, and ‘manufacturing AI manpower level of solution providers’ were found. Conclusion: For the sustainable growth of the domestic manufacturing AI ecosystem, it should be possible to develop and promote manufacturing AI policies in a balanced way by considering all four derived viewpoints. This paper is expected to be used as an effective guideline when developing policies for upgrading manufacturing through domestic manufacturing data and AI in the future.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to derive major policies that domestic small and medium-sized manufacturing companies should consider to maximize productivity and quality improvement by utilizing manufacturing data and AI, and to find priorities and implications. Methods: In this study, domestic and international issues and literature review by country were conducted to derive major considerations such as manufacturing AI technology, manufacturing AI talent, manufacturing AI data and manufacturing AI ecosystem. Additionally, the questionnaire survey targeting 46 experts of manufacturing data and AI industry were conducted. Finally, the major considerations and detailed factors importance were derived by applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Results: As a result of the study, it was found that 'manufacturing AI technology', 'manufacturing AI talent', 'manufacturing AI data', and 'manufacturing AI ecosystem' exist as key considerations for domestic manufacturing AI. After empirical analysis, the importance of the four key considerations was found to be 'manufacturing AI ecosystem (0.272)', 'manufacturing AI data (0.265)', 'manufacturing AI technology (0.233)', and 'manufacturing AI talent (0.230)'. The importance of the derived four viewpoints is maintained at a similar level. In addition, looking at the detailed variables with the highest importance for each of the four perspectives, ‘Best Practice’, ‘manufacturing data quality management regime, ‘manufacturing data collection infrastructure’, and ‘manufacturing AI manpower level of solution providers’ were found. Conclusion: For the sustainable growth of the domestic manufacturing AI ecosystem, it should be possible to develop and promote manufacturing AI policies in a balanced way by considering all four derived viewpoints. This paper is expected to be used as an effective guideline when developing policies for upgrading manufacturing through domestic manufacturing data and AI in the future.
참고문헌 (40)
- Arinez, J. F., "Artificial intelligence in advanced manufacturing : Current status and future outlook", Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 142(11), pp.110804~ (2020)
- Bagheri, B., "A unified data security framework for federated prognostics and health management in smart manufacturing", Manufacturing Letters, 24, pp.136~139 (2020)
- Belhadi, A., "Building supply-chain resilience : an artificial intelligence-based technique and decision-making framework", International Journal of Production Research, 60(14), pp.4487~4507 (2021)
- Bundesregierung, D., "Strategie Künstliche Intelligenz der Bundesregierung", ~ (2020)
- Celikok, K., "Effects of German-Tukish industrail policies on manufacturing industry competitiveness", Sakarya İktisat Dergisi, 9(4), pp.405~434 (2020)
- Cerquitelli, T., "Manufacturing as a data-driven practice : methodologies, technologies, and tools", Proceedings of the IEEE, 109(4), pp.399~422 (2021)
- Chatterjee, S., "Understanding AI adoption in manufacturing and production firms using an integrated TAM-TOE model", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 170, pp.120880~ (2021)
- 최윤혁, "스마트 제조기술 수준에 따른 인력 양성 방안에 대한 탐색적 연구", 실천공학교육논문지, 11(2), pp.269~282 (2019), 한국실천공학교육학회[DOI]
- 정혜란, "4차 산업혁명시대의 스마트 팩토리 구축을 위한 품질전략", 품질경영학회지, 48(1), pp.87~105 (2020), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Dogan, A., "Machine learning and data mining in manufacturing", Expert Systems with Applications, 166, pp.114060~ (2021)
- Fan, Y., "A digital-twin visualized architecture for Flexible Manufacturing System", Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 60, pp.176~201 (2021)
- Fisher, O., "Cloud manufacturing as a sustainble process manufacturing route", Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 47, pp.53~68 (2018)
- Harris, G., "A systems approach to establishing an advanced manufacturing innovation institute", Systems, 7(3), pp.41~ (2019)
- Holroyd, C, "Technological innovation and building a ‘super smart’society: Japan’s vision of society 5.0", Journal of Asian Public Policy, 15(1), pp.18~31 (2022)
- Ignaccolo, M., "Combining Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP)with role-playing games for stakeholder engagement in complex transport decisions", Transportation Research Procedia, 27, pp.500~507 (2017)
- 김익성, "4차 산업혁명의 핵심 연구대상인 독일 자동화공장의 성공사례연구와 한국 내 도입방안: 한국 스마트공장건립을 위한 정책 및 전략제안", 유라시아연구, 17(3), pp.189~213 (2020), 아시아.유럽미래학회[DOI]
- 김인성, "중소기업지원정책과 경영성과의 효율성 분석", 한국창업학회지, 16(5), pp.43~69 (2021), 한국창업학회[DOI]
- Innovative Growth Strategy in the US, Europe, and Japan, "Kim, K.", Korea Institute for Intenational Economic Policy, ~, pp.Research Report 15(1) (2019)
- 김영현, "국방품질경영체제(DQMS) 정량평가모델 개발 및 제도화 방안 연구", 품질경영학회지, 50(2), pp.183~197 (2022), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Kinkel, S., "Prerequisites for the adoption of AI technologies in manufacturing–Evidence from a worldwide sample of manufacturing companies", Technovation, 110, pp.102375~ (2022)
- Kuhn, C., "Supporting the digital transformation : a low-threshold approach for manufacturing related higher education and employee training", Procedia CIRP, 104, pp.647~652 (2021)
- Kumar, A, "National AI Policy", Strategy of India and China: A Comparative Analysis, 2021
- Mantravadi, S., "Multi-agent Manufacturing Execution System(MES) : Concept, architecture & ML algorithm for a smart factory case", 21st International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, ICEIS 2019, pp.477~482 (2019)
- Promyoo, R., "Innovative digital manufacturing curriculum for industry 4.0", Procedia Manufacturing, 34, pp.1043~1050 (2019)
- Riahi, Y., "Artificial intelligence applications in supply chain : A descriptive bibliometric analysis and future research directions", Expert Systems with Applications, 173, pp.114702~ (2021)
- Saaty, T. L., "An objective approach to faculty promotion and tenure by the analytic hierarchy process", Research in Higher Education, 18(3), pp.311~331 (1983)
- Sagodi, A., "Becoming Certain About the Uncertain: How AI Changes Proof-of-Concept Activities in Manufacturing–Insights from a Global Automotive Leader", Proceedings of the 55th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2022)
- Samuel, J., "A research university and community college collaboration model to promote micro-manufacturing education: preliminary findings", Procedia Manufacturing, 5, pp.1168~1182 (2016)
- Satty, T. L., "The Analytic Hierarchy Process-Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation", pp.287~ (1980), McGraw-Hill
- 서재홍, "LSTM-VAE를 활용한 기계시설물 장치의 이상 탐지 시스템", 품질경영학회지, 49(4), pp.581~594 (2021), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
- Tao, F., "Data-driven smart manufacturing", Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 48, pp.157~169 (2018)
- Ulnicane, I, "The Routledge Handbook of European Integrations" (2022), Taylor & Francis
- Victor, O. E., "Technology, Innovation and National Manufacturing Competitiveness", European Journal of Business and Management Technology, 11(4), pp.1~8 (2019)
- Vladimirovna, N. E., "Digital Industrialization: Entrepreneurial Features of Advanced Nations Innovation Policies During Industrial Revolution 4.0", Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal, 27(6), pp.1~9 (2021)
- Wang, B., "Toward human-centric smart manufacturing : A human-cyber-physical systems(HCPS)perspective", Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 63, pp.471~490 (2022)
- WEF, "Global Lighthouse Network: Unlocking Sustainability through Fourth Industrial Revolution Technologie", ~ (2021)
- Wilson, S, "Building apparel manufacturing competitiveness through policy–a system dynamics approach. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management", An International Journal, 24(2), pp.277~302 (2020)
- Xu, K., "Advanced data collection and analysis in data-driven manufacturing process", Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 33(1), pp.1~21 (2020)
- 유광현, "국내 제조업의 경쟁력 강화를 위한 효과적인 리쇼어링과 제조업 육성정책에 관한 연구", 무역연구, 12(3), pp.431~447 (2016), 한국무역연구원
- Zahedi, F, "The analytic hierarchy process-A survey of the method and its applications", Interfaces, 16(4), pp.96~108 (1986)