본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

ISO 56000 관점의 혁신 이니셔티브에 관한 체계적 문헌 분석: 토픽모델링(LDA)과 생성형 AI 기반 해석을 중심으로

A Systematic Literature Analysis of Innovation Initiatives from an ISO 56000 Perspective: Focusing on Topic Modelling(LDA) and Generative AI-based Interpretation

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: This study examines the utilization of 'innovation initiatives' in management and business literature, aiming to systematically classify its various types. Methods: : Employing the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling technique, we analyzed 690 SSCI-listed scholarly articles published between 2000 and 2023 related to innovation initiatives. We extracted and categorized the main themes to understand the evolution and classification of innovation initiatives. To enhance the reliability of topic interpretation, generative AI models were used to verify and complement the researchers' subjective analyses by comparing AI-generated insights with human interpretations. Results: : The analysis identified four primary types of innovation initiatives: digital technology utilization, collaborative process innovation, knowledge-based process innovation, and product innovation. This classification illustrates that companies adopt diverse approaches to promote innovation. The topic interpretations showed high consistency between the researchers' assessments and the generative AI models, reinforcing the reliability of the findings. Conclusion: This study offers insights into the classification and evolution of innovation initiatives, providing a robust framework for businesses to develop and manage their strategies effectively. Integrating generative AI in topic interpretation enhances the objectivity and reliability of the analysis. However, the research is limited by its focus on English-language publications and the ethical considerations of AI usage. Future re-search should incorporate multilingual data and explore AI’s ethical implications. Additionally, expanding to diverse organizational structures and industry-specific innovations will further enrich the understanding of innovation initiatives.

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the utilization of 'innovation initiatives' in management and business literature, aiming to systematically classify its various types. Methods: : Employing the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling technique, we analyzed 690 SSCI-listed scholarly articles published between 2000 and 2023 related to innovation initiatives. We extracted and categorized the main themes to understand the evolution and classification of innovation initiatives. To enhance the reliability of topic interpretation, generative AI models were used to verify and complement the researchers' subjective analyses by comparing AI-generated insights with human interpretations. Results: : The analysis identified four primary types of innovation initiatives: digital technology utilization, collaborative process innovation, knowledge-based process innovation, and product innovation. This classification illustrates that companies adopt diverse approaches to promote innovation. The topic interpretations showed high consistency between the researchers' assessments and the generative AI models, reinforcing the reliability of the findings. Conclusion: This study offers insights into the classification and evolution of innovation initiatives, providing a robust framework for businesses to develop and manage their strategies effectively. Integrating generative AI in topic interpretation enhances the objectivity and reliability of the analysis. However, the research is limited by its focus on English-language publications and the ethical considerations of AI usage. Future re-search should incorporate multilingual data and explore AI’s ethical implications. Additionally, expanding to diverse organizational structures and industry-specific innovations will further enrich the understanding of innovation initiatives.

참고문헌 (55)

  1. Adams R, "Innovation management measurement : A review", Int J Management Reviews, 8(1), pp.21~47 (2006)[DOI]
  2. Amabile TM, "The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations : Making progress, making meaning", Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, pp.157~183 (2016)[DOI]
  3. Bessant J, "High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement", IJTM, 14(1), pp.7~ (1997)[DOI]
  4. Birkinshaw J, "Management innovation", Academy of management Review, 33(4), pp.825~845 (2008)
  5. Blei DM, "Latent dirichlet allocation", Journal of machine Learning research, 3, pp.993~1022 (2003)
  6. "Topic Models. Text mining/Chapman and Hall/CRC" (2009)[URL]
  7. Blei DM, "Probabilistic topic models", Commun ACM, 55(4), pp.77~84 (2012)[DOI]
  8. "New Taxonomy for Corporate Open Innovation Initiatives: Best Practices and an Empirical Validation among Germany’s 500 Biggest Companies" (2020)[URL]
  9. Chuang J, "Termite: visualization techniques for assessing textual topic models", Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp.74~77 (2012), Association for Computing Machinery
  10. Crossan MM, "A multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation : A systematic review of the literature", Journal of management studies, 47(6), pp.1154~1191 (2010)
  11. Damanpour F, "Managerial innovation : Conceptions, processes and antecedents", Management and organization review, 8(2), pp.423~454 (2012)
  12. Damanpour F, "Internal and External Sources and the Adoption of Innovations in Organizations", British J of Management, 29(4), pp.712~730 (2018)[DOI]
  13. Dougherty D, "SUSTAINED PRODUCT INNOVATION IN LARGE, MATURE ORGANIZATIONS:OVERCOMING INNOVATION-TO-ORGANIZATION PROBLEMS", Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), pp.1120~1153 (1996)[DOI]
  14. "Global innovation index 2021: tracking innovation through the covid-19 crisis" (2021)[URL]
  15. Ende J van den, "Innovation Management" (2021), Bloomsbury Publishing
  16. Fagerberg J, "The Oxford Handbook of Innovation" (2006), Oxford University Press
  17. Floridi L, "Machine Learning and the City", pp.535~545 (2022), John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
  18. Goffin K, "Innovation management: effective strategy and implementation" (2016), Bloomsbury Publishing
  19. Gopalakrishnan S, "A review of innovation research in economics, sociology and technology management", Omega, 25(1), pp.15~28 (1997)
  20. "Innovation and growth in the global economy" (1993)[URL]
  21. Ha GR, "The Impact of Technology Innovation Activity on Managerial Efficiency : An Inverted U shaped Model", Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 46(3), pp.551~568 (2018)[DOI]
  22. "Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations" (2001)[URL]
  23. Howell JM, "Champions of technological innovation", Administrative science quarterly, pp.317~341 (1990)
  24. "Innovation management — Fundamentals and vocabulary" (2020)[URL]
  25. Jobin A, "The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines", Nature machine intelligence, 1(9), pp.389~399 (2019)
  26. Keupp MM, "Determinants and archetype users of open innovation", R & D Management, 39(4), pp.331~341 (2009)[DOI]
  27. Kim L., "Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning" (1997), Harvard Business School Press
  28. Kim YS, "An Empirical Study on the Effect of International Standards Management System Integration on Business Performance-Focused on Quality, Environment and Health & safety management system-", Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 45(4), pp.781~810 (2017)[DOI]
  29. Lee K, "Technological regimes, catching-up and leapfrogging : findings from the Korean industries", Research policy, 30(3), pp.459~483 (2001)
  30. Lee K, "How does open innovation lead competitive advantage? A dynamic capability view perspective", PloS one, 14(11), pp.e0223405~ (2019)
  31. "Radical Innovation: How Mature Companies Can Outsmart Upstarts" (2000)[URL]
  32. "Introduction to information retrieval" (2008)[URL]
  33. McDermott CM, "Managing radical innovation: an overview of emergent strategy issues", J of Product Innov Manag, 19(6), pp.424~438 (2002)[DOI]
  34. Moher D, "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement", Ann Intern Med, 151(4), pp.264~ (2009)[DOI]
  35. O’Connor GC, "Organizing for Radical Innovation: An Exploratory Study of the Structural Aspects of RI Management Systems in Large Established Firms", J of Product Innov Manag, 23(6), pp.475~497 (2006)[DOI]
  36. O’Connor GC, "Grabbing lightning: Building a capability for breakthrough innovation" (2008), John Wiley & Sons
  37. "Oslo Manual 2018: Guidelines for Collecting, Reporting and Using Data on Innovation" (2018)[URL]
  38. "OECD Reviews of Innovation Policy: Korea 2023" (2023)[URL]
  39. Park S, "Comparative analysis of third-level digital divide among Korean older adults: Capital-based approach", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 204, pp.123381~ (2024)
  40. Park S-H, "An Exploratory Study on the Trends and Introductions of Innovation Management System International Standards", Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management(JKSQM), 46(4), pp.761~783 (2018)
  41. Pavitt K, "Sectoral patterns of technical change : towards a taxonomy and a theory", Research policy, 13(6), pp.343~373 (1984)
  42. "TopicGPT: A Prompt-based Topic Modeling Framework" (2024)[URL]
  43. Pisano GP, "You need an innovation strategy", Harvard business review, 93(6), pp.44~54 (2015)
  44. Porter ME, "How smart, connected products are transforming competition", Harvard business review, 92(11), pp.64~88 (2014)
  45. Prajogo DI, "The relationship between organization strategy, total quality management(TQM), and organization performance—-the mediating role of TQM", European journal of operational research, 168(1), pp.35~50 (2006)
  46. Rijcken E, "Towards interpreting topic models with ChatGPT", The 20th World Congress of the International Fuzzy Systems Association (2023)
  47. Romer PM, "Endogenous Technological Change", Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2), pp.S71~S102 (1990)[DOI]
  48. "Strategic management of technological innovation" (2017)[URL]
  49. Schumpeter JA, "The Theory of Economic Development" (2021), Routledge
  50. Shane S, "Championing Innovation in the Global Corporation", Research-Technology Management, 37(4), pp.29~35 (1994)[DOI]
  51. "Do We Need Subject Matter Experts? A Case Study of Measuring Up GPT-4 Against Scholars in Topic Evaluation. In: NL4AI@ AI* IA" (2023)[URL]
  52. Sievert C, "LDAvis: A method for visualizing and interpreting topics", Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Language Learning, Visualization, and Interfaces, pp.63~70 (2014), Association for Computational Linguistics
  53. Solow RM, "Technical change and the aggregate production function", The review of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), pp.312~320 (1957)
  54. Tidd J, "Managing innovation: integrating technological, market and organizational change" (2020), John Wiley & Sons
  55. Van de Ven AH, "Building an infrastructure for the innovation journey", The Innovation Journey, pp.149~180 (1999)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)