본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

지원적 상생협력이 안전 분위기, 안전 예방 활동 및 안전 행동에 미치는 영향: 중소 물류기업의 안전 품질 관점에서

A Study on the Effects of the Win-Win Supportive Collaboration on Safety Climate, Safety Prevention, and Safety Behavior: From the Safety Quality Perspective of Domestic Small and Medium-sized Logistics Companies

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류학제간연구

초록

Purpose: This study aims to contribute to the research flow on the relationship between win-win supportive collaboration and safety, while noting that win-win supportive collaboration affects corporate safety-related factors such as climate, safety prevention, and behavior from the perspective of domestic small and medium- sized logistics companies that have signed contracts with large logistics companies, Methods: Based on responses from 147 small and medium-sized logistics companies, structural equation modeling is performed to examine the relationship among the factors such as supportive collaboration, safety climate, safety prevention, safety behavior. Results: Study results are as follows. Supportive collaboration of large logistics companies influence the formation of a safety climate and safety behavior within logistics SMEs positively. In addition, safety prevention and safety behavior are affected by safety climate in a positive way. Conclusion: Win-Win supportive collaboration is a driving force behind safety management practices in the supply chain leading to safety management performance, so it is necessary to consider it for the growth of the sustainable supply chain.

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to contribute to the research flow on the relationship between win-win supportive collaboration and safety, while noting that win-win supportive collaboration affects corporate safety-related factors such as climate, safety prevention, and behavior from the perspective of domestic small and medium- sized logistics companies that have signed contracts with large logistics companies, Methods: Based on responses from 147 small and medium-sized logistics companies, structural equation modeling is performed to examine the relationship among the factors such as supportive collaboration, safety climate, safety prevention, safety behavior. Results: Study results are as follows. Supportive collaboration of large logistics companies influence the formation of a safety climate and safety behavior within logistics SMEs positively. In addition, safety prevention and safety behavior are affected by safety climate in a positive way. Conclusion: Win-Win supportive collaboration is a driving force behind safety management practices in the supply chain leading to safety management performance, so it is necessary to consider it for the growth of the sustainable supply chain.

참고문헌 (50)

  1. Auyong, H., "Safety and health management in logistics : literature review and future research", Journal of System and Management Sciences, 1(3), pp.9~20 (2011)
  2. Banks, T., "Driver education and safety climate in an emergency services fleet", Journal of Health, Safety and Environment, 22(4), pp.341~350 (2006)
  3. Bollen, K. A., "Structural Equations with Latent Variable" (1989), Wilely
  4. Brown, K. A, "Workplace safety : a call for research", Journal of operations management, 14(2), pp.157~171 (1996)
  5. Browne, M. W., "Testing Structural Equation Models" (1993), Sage
  6. Cantor, D. E, "Workplace safety in the supply chain : a review of the literature and call for research", The International Journal of Logistics Management, 19(1), pp.65~83 (2008)
  7. Caponecchia C., "Defining a “Safe System of Work”", Safety and Health at Work, 12(4), pp.421~423 (2021), 한국산업안전보건공단 산업안전보건연구원[DOI]
  8. Carmines, E. G., "Social Measurement: Current Issues" (1981), Sage
  9. Carter, C. R., "The Role of Purchasing Corporate Social Responsibility : A Structural Equation Analysis", Journal of Business Logistics, 25(1), pp.145~186 (2004)
  10. Chen, D, "Behavior based safety for accidents prevention and positive study in China construction project", Procedia Engineering, 43, pp.528~534 (2012)
  11. 최재림, "스마트안전 리빙랩 환경에서의 사용자경험 평가를 위한 방법론 개발", 품질경영학회지, 49(2), pp.127~143 (2021), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  12. Ciliberti, F., "Logistics Social Responsibility; Standard Adoption and practices in Italian Companies", International Journal of Production Economics, 113(1), pp.88~106 (2008)
  13. Clarke, S, "The relationship between safety climate and safety performance : a meta-analytic review", Journal of occupational health psychology, 11(4), pp.315~327 (2006)
  14. Clarke, S, "Safety climate in an automobile manufacturing plant : The effects of work environment, job communication and safety attitudes on accidents and unsafe behaviour", Personnel review, 35(4), pp.413~430 (2006)
  15. Clarke, S., "The role of leader influence tactics and safety climate in engaging employees' safety participation", Risk analysis, 26(5), pp.1175~1185 (2006)
  16. Das, A., "Toward a theory of the linkages between safety and quality", Journal of Operations Management, 26(4), pp.521~535 (2008)
  17. Fornell C., "Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservalbe Variables and Measurement Error", Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), pp.39~50 (1981)
  18. Griffin, M. A., "Perceptions of safety at work : a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation", Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5(3), pp.347~358 (2000)
  19. Hofmann, D. A., "A cross-level investigation of factors influencing unsafe behaviors and accidents", Personnel psychology, 49(2), pp.307~339 (1996)
  20. 황선철, "안전문화 지각과 안전행동 간의 관계에서 예방초점 및 운명주의의 조절효과", 인적자원개발연구, 18(4), pp.153~176 (2015), 한국인적자원개발학회
  21. 강태선, "(주)BYN블랙야크의 ESG 경영 실천 사례 : 국내 투명 페트병 자원순환 시스템을 중심으로", 품질경영학회지, 49(3), pp.433~446 (2021), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  22. 강영기, "중대재해처벌법의 시행에 따른 기업들의 대응방안 등에 대한 검토", 법과 기업 연구, 11(2), pp.211~245 (2021), 법학연구소
  23. 김현정, "EU 공동시장 공정규제(process regulation)로서의 기업실사의무 법안 분석", 유럽연구, 39(4), pp.153~178 (2021), 한국유럽학회[DOI]
  24. 김현수, "임상에서의 상생: 남성간호사에 대한 여성간호사의 적응 경험", 간호행정학회지, 24(5), pp.423~434 (2018), 간호행정학회[DOI]
  25. 김영민, "물류 안전 분위기가 물류 안전행동 및 물류 안전성과에 미치는 영향 : 물류 안전지식과 물류 안전동기의 매개효과", 무역학회지, 45(1), pp.259~277 (2020), 한국무역학회[DOI]
  26. Kim, Y. H., "Financial benefits and risks of dependency in triadic supply chain relationships", Journal of Operations Management, 36, pp.115~129 (2015)
  27. 김영민, "물류기업 종사자의 운송부문 물류안전 인식에 관한 연구", 물류학회지, 24(5), pp.223~245 (2014), 한국물류학회
  28. 김영길, "공급사슬 CSR 실행, 상생협력과 기업성과 간의 관계에 대한 연구 -중국 기업을 중심으로-", 한국SCM학회지, 19(1), pp.71~80 (2019), 한국SCM학회[DOI]
  29. "Traffic Safety Information Management Complex System" (2022)[URL]
  30. Kotabe, M., "Gaining from vertical partnerships : Knowledge transfer, relationship duration, and supplier performance improvement in the U. S., and Japanese automotive industries", Strategic Management Journal, 24(4), pp.293~316 (2003)
  31. Ladewski, B. J., "Quality and safety management practices : The theory of quality management approach", Journal of safety research, 69, pp.193~200 (2019)
  32. Lambert, D. M., "Building successful logistics partnerships", Journal of Business Logistics, 20(1), pp.165~181 (1999)
  33. Lawson, B., "Antecedents and consequences of social capital on buyer performance improvement", Journal of Operations Management, 26(3), pp.446~460 (2008)
  34. 이정기, "“지속가능경영” 연구의 현황 및 발전방향: ESG 평가지표를 중심으로", 전략경영연구, 23(2), pp.65~92 (2020), 한국전략경영학회[DOI]
  35. 이수열, "상생협력과 공급사 성과: 관계적 사회자본의 매개효과", 경영학연구, 42(4), pp.1105~1130 (2013), 한국경영학회
  36. 이수열, "상생협력 공급사슬 관리의 유형과 성과: 내부 프로세스 통합, 조직시민행동, 생산운영 성과의 실증분석", 한국SCM학회지, 15(2), pp.35~52 (2015), 한국SCM학회
  37. 이성희, "중소 물류기업의 안전 환경이 안전 행동에 미치는 영향", 한국산업정보학회논문지, 27(1), pp.135~146 (2022), 한국산업정보학회
  38. MacCallum, R. C., "Power Analysis and Determination of Sample Size for Covariance Structure Modeling", Psychological Methods, 1(2), pp.130~149 (1996)
  39. 문광수, "행동주의 기반 안전관리(BBS) 프로그램이 안전분위기와 안전행동에 미치는 효과: 현장 연구", 한국심리학회지: 산업 및 조직, 25(2), pp.349~372 (2012), 한국산업및조직심리학회[DOI]
  40. Neal, A., "The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior", Safety Science, 34(1-3), pp.99~109 (2000)
  41. Newaz, M. T., "Using a psychological contract of safety to predict safety climate on construction sites", Journal of Safety Research, 68, pp.9~19 (2019)
  42. Niskanen, T, "Safety climate in the road administration", Safety Science, 17(4), pp.237~255 (1994)
  43. Nunnally, J. C, "Psychometric Theory" (1978), McGraw-Hill Book Company
  44. 박찬권, "공급사슬에서의 갈등대응이 사회적 자본과 상생협력 및 공급사슬성과에 미치는 영향", 한국SCM학회지, 18(1), pp.73~89 (2018), 한국SCM학회[DOI]
  45. 신완선, "융복합제품을 위한 모듈방식의 안전인증체계 설계 -자율주행 자동차를 중심으로-", 품질경영학회지, 46(4), pp.1001~1014 (2018), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  46. Steiger, J. H, "Ezpath: Causal Modeling" (1989), SYSTAT
  47. "2021 ESG Incident Report" (2022)[URL]
  48. 원종운, "IoT기반 철도 화차 안전운송 통합 품질관리시스템에 관한 경제성 평가지표 분석", 품질경영학회지, 44(4), pp.869~882 (2016), 한국품질경영학회[DOI]
  49. Zohar, D, "Safety Climate in Industrial Organizations : Theoretical and Applied Implications", Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), pp.96~102 (1980)
  50. Zohar, D, "Thirty years of safety climate research : Reflections and future directions", Accident Analysis &Prevention, 42(5), pp.1517~1522 (2010)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)