소절구조의 술어분석
A Predicate Analysis of Small Clause Constructions
4
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
초록
Abstract
The linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 12 (2), 97-113. This paper's aim is to suggest that SCs do form constituents, and that an understanding of SCs peculiarities can only come from an understanding of the topic structure of SCs. By considering what forms a topic in SCs, we can understand why verbal SC complements do not allow raising, and adjectival SC complements to raising verbs do not allow lowering. In doing so, I will show that the matrix verb and SC predicate in some instances must form a complex predicate at LF, and that there is functional structure-specifically, topic phrase-within the SC. Pointing to differences between ECM/raising and SC constructions does not necessarily argue against the SC hypothesis. This paper focuses on the following two observations : the lack of passive for verbs that take bare infinitival complements, and the lack of a narrow scope interpretation for subjects raised from adjectival SCs. It shows that with bare infinitival complements, the subject of the SC is not the topic; this contrasts with adjectival SCs, where the subject must be a topic. The differences between verbal and adjectival SCs then follow. Though the differing restrictions found in verbal and adjectival SCs may appear to be the result of independent properties, this paper shows that these restrictions are tied to the same basic phenomenon-that of topic placement.
참고문헌 (23)
- "The Syntax of Predication" (1993)
- "Syntax and Smantics 28: Small Clauses" (1995), Academic Press
- "References to kinds in English" (1977)
- "The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory", (am) (1975), Plenum Press
- "A minimalist program for linguistic theory In The view of form Building 20 Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", (am), pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
- "Categories and transformations. In The Minimalist program", pp.219~394 (1995), MIT Press
- "Introduction to Government & Binding Theory" (1998), Basil Blackwell INC,Cambridge, Mass
- "The stage", individual contrast revisited. In Proceedings of the 15th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. by Brian Agbayani and Sze-Wing Tang, 1995, 224~240[DOI]
- "The Philosophy of Grammar", Norton & Company Inc
- "Connectedness and binary branching" (1984), Foris
- "Stage level and individual level predicates.", pp.125~175 (1995), University of Chicago Press.
- "In Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory Ⅳ", pp.220~229 (1994), Cornell University
- "The grammar of quantification" (1977)
- "Transformational Grammar" (1988), Cambridge University Press
- "Two types of small clauses Toward a syntax of theme", rheme relations, 1995, 179~206[DOI]
- "Origins of phrase structure" (1981)
- "Subjects across categories", 2, pp.285~312 (1983)
- "Raising in Irish and Projection Principle" (1989)
- "In Principles and parameters in comparative grammar", MIT Press
- "Remarks on clause structure. In Syntax and semantics 28: Small clauses, ed. by Anna Cardinaletti and Maria Teresa Guasti", pp.271~286 (1995), Academic Press
- Takahashi,Daiko, "Minimality of movement", university of connecticut (1994), Storrs
- "Small Clauses in English", pp.249~273 (1975), Academic Press
- "There-insertion", 15, pp.131~154 (1984)