본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

범죄피해자와 회복적 사법의 모델

A Study of Criminal Victims and Restorative Justice

박상식
한국피해자학회 (Korean Association Of Victimology)|2005.04|피해자학연구 (Korean Journal of Victimology)|제13권 제1호|pp. 129-163

0

조회

0

다운로드

25

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

범죄피해자회복적 사법restorative justicecriminal victims집단회의family group conferencing

초록

Abstract

Restorative justice is defined as a legal process in which instead of relying on the state's intervention to punish offenders unilaterally, victims and other community members are involved in addressing legal cases. In other words, restorative justice doesn't aim at simply punishing criminals, but attempts to engage communities and victims so that they can arrive at reconciliations with offenders by means of dialogues and negotiations. The ultimate goal of restorative justice is to protect criminal victims, even though it may give protection to offender themselves. There are two major frameworks for restorative justice: Purist Model and Maximalist Model. The purist model encourages voluntary participation of the parties involved and communities, while the maximalist model stipulates mandatory participations and does not necessarily involve communities. Three major enforcement models have been suggested for restorative justice: Victim-Offender mediation program : (VOMP), Family Group Conferencing, and Circles model. Most commonly adopted is Victim-Offender mediation program (VOMP), which may be considered to be the most ideal, even though there's some dispute over who should be the arbitrator. In the 21st century there has been an increasing agreement in international communities that it may not be so idealistic to settle crimes merely by relying on the punishment of offenders. It seems a little bit late, but Korean criminal procedures should also accommodate restorative justice in order to include victims as active parties in the legal system and to settle criminal cases through dialogues and compromises between offenders, victims and arbitrators.

참고문헌 (43)

  1. 染田惠, "回復的司法の理論的實務的課題と日本における活用可能性", (127) (2001)
  2. "わが國べの‘刑事和解’モデルの導入に向けて" (1997), Japan Criminal Policy Society
  3. "刑事政策槪論" (1996), 靑林書院
  4. "被害者問題と修復的司法: ニュ-ジ-ランドのFamily Group Conference を中心" (2002)
  5. "修復的司法について", 刑法雜誌
  6. "諸外國における犯罪被害者施策に關する硏究 オセアニアにおける犯罪被害者施策" (2000)
  7. "回復的司法の理念と實踐", 41(2) (2002), 일본형법학회
  8. "修復的司法の探求" (2003), 成文堂
  9. "修復的司法の 探究: 回復的司法のパラダイム" (2003)
  10. "刑法における損害回復の思想" (1997), 成文堂
  11. "修復的司法の 探究: 제5회 回復的司法國際會議報告" (2003), 成文堂
  12. "刑法における損害回復" (1998)
  13. "Viktimologische und kriminalpolitische berlegungen zur Stellung des Verletzten im Strafverfahren" (1984), ZStW96
  14. "Die Stellung des Verletzten im Strafprozeß" (1981), ZStW 93
  15. "Realistic or Utopian?" (1999)
  16. "Restorative Justice Through Victim-Offender Mediation" (1998)
  17. "The Evolution of Restorative Justice in Britain European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research", 4 (1996)
  18. "Corrections Compendium" (1998)
  19. "Restorative Justice An Overview" (1998), University of Minnesota
  20. "Restorative Justice & CriminalJustice: Restoration and Retribution" (2003), Hart Publishing
  21. "in Search of Fundamentales and an Outline for Systemic Reform Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime" (1999)
  22. "A Study of Crime Victims and Their Roles" (2002)
  23. "Four challenges of Restorative Justice" (1993)
  24. "U.S. Department of Justice" (1999)
  25. "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions" (1996), University of Chicago
  26. "Restorative Justice An Overview" (1998), University of Minnesota
  27. "Restorative Justice Handbook" (1998), Corrections Compendium
  28. "The Evolution of Restorative Justice in Britain European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research", 4 (1996)
  29. "in Search of Fundamentales and an Outline for Systemic Reform Repairing the Harm of Youth Crime" (1999)
  30. "Toward a Holistic Vision of Restorative Juvenile Justice A Reply to the Maximalist Model", pp.3~4 (2000)
  31. "How Pure Can a Maximalist Approach to Restorative Justice Remain? Or Can a Purist Model of Restorative Justice Become Maximalist Contemporary for Restorative Justiice Review" (2000), 3-4
  32. "Toward a Holistic Vision of Restorative Juvenile Justice A Reply to the maximalist Model" (2000)
  33. "Victim Policies and Criminal Justice on the Road to Restorative Justice A Collection of Essays in Honour of Tony Peters" (2001)
  34. "Restorative and Community Justice in the United States" (2000), 27 Crime and Just
  35. "Mediation in the Criminal Justice System", 72 (1994)
  36. "Restorative Justice on Trial in Britain" (1995), Mediation Quarterly
  37. "National Survey of Victim-Offender Mediation Programs in the United States" (2000), National Survey of Victim-Offender Mediation Programs in the United States
  38. "Evaluating Restorative Justice Practices, in : HirshRobertsBottomsRoach and Schiff(ed.) Restorative Justice & Criminal Justice" (2003), Hart Publishing
  39. "Still Tough on Crime? Prospects for Restorative Justice in the United States" (2002)
  40. "Youth Justice in New Zealand Victoria University of Wellington" (1993)
  41. "Victoria University of Wellington" (1999)
  42. "Models Challenges and The Promise of Restrative Conferencing Strategies" (2003), Hart Publishing
  43. "Restorative Justic Circles in South Saint Paul Center for Restorative Justic and Peacemaking School of Social Work University of Minnesota" (2000)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)

범죄피해자에 대한 재정적 지원제도의 현황과 개선방안오영근, 이천현pp. 5-49범죄피해경험, 이웃통합 그리고 범죄의 두려움:대학생에 대한 심층면접결과를 중심으로박철현pp. 51-77방화범죄의 피해와 그 대책방안윤상민pp. 79-100범죄양상 변화에 따른 피해 경감방안이만종pp. 101-128범죄피해자 보호지원강화를 위한 종합대책김현철pp. 165-182
원문 보기