본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

EFL Readers' Test-taking Processes for Completion vs. Multiple Choice Cloze Tests

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류언어학

초록

This study investigates test-taking processes used by skilled and less skilled university seniors in Korea as they performed a completion rational cloze (Ccloze) and its counterpart multiple choice cloze (Mcloze). Data collected from think-aloud protocols were analyzed and seven types of strategies were categorized. The frequency and quality of the test-taking strategies were examined along with their test performance. The results show that most of their strategies used in the two cloze tests were text-based, which means the readers relied heavily on their linguistic knowledge to cope with cloze items. As for separate strategy types, test-specific strategies were the most frequently utilized in both tests but most of the strategies in the Mcloze were matching and selection. Overall, the more difficult the cloze items, the more multiple strategies were employed, obviously by the skilled group. The findings suggest that the Ccloze induces test takers to be more cognitively involved than the Mcloze, and that the more skilled, the more flexible the test takers are in proper and multiple strategy use.

Abstract

This study investigates test-taking processes used by skilled and less skilled university seniors in Korea as they performed a completion rational cloze (Ccloze) and its counterpart multiple choice cloze (Mcloze). Data collected from think-aloud protocols were analyzed and seven types of strategies were categorized. The frequency and quality of the test-taking strategies were examined along with their test performance. The results show that most of their strategies used in the two cloze tests were text-based, which means the readers relied heavily on their linguistic knowledge to cope with cloze items. As for separate strategy types, test-specific strategies were the most frequently utilized in both tests but most of the strategies in the Mcloze were matching and selection. Overall, the more difficult the cloze items, the more multiple strategies were employed, obviously by the skilled group. The findings suggest that the Ccloze induces test takers to be more cognitively involved than the Mcloze, and that the more skilled, the more flexible the test takers are in proper and multiple strategy use.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Alderson, J, "The cloze procedure and proficiency in English as a foreign language" (1979)
  2. Bachman, L. F, "Performance on cloze tests with fixed-ratio and rational deletions" (1985)
  3. Bachman, L. F, "Language testing-SLA research interfaces", pp.177~195 (1998), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  4. Black, J. H, "Learning and reception strategy use and the cloze procedure" (1993)
  5. Block, E, "The comprehension strategies of second language learners" (1986)
  6. Carrell, P. L, "Three components of background knowledge in reading comprehension" (1983)
  7. Chvez-Oller, M, "When are cloze items sensitive to constraints across sentences?" (1985)
  8. Cohen, A. D, "Strategies and processes in test taking and SLA", pp.90~111 (1998), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  9. Ericsson, K. A, "Verbal reports as data" (1980)
  10. Fotos, S. S, "The Cloze Test as an Integrative Measure of EFL Proficiency: A Substitute for Essays on College Entrance Examinations?" (1991)
  11. Grabe, W, "Current Developments in Second Language Reading Research" (1991)
  12. Grabe, W, "Reading-Writing Relations: Theoretical Perspectives and Instructional Practices", pp.15~47 (2001), Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan University Press
  13. Greene, B. B, "Testing reading comprehension of theoretical discourse with cloze", 24(1), pp.82~98 (2001)
  14. Hartmann, "Interactions" (2007), New York: McGraw-Hill
  15. Jonz, J, "Textual cohesion and second language comprehension" (1987)
  16. Jonz, J, "Another turn in the conversation: What coes cloze measure?" (1990)
  17. Jonz, J, "A critical appraisal of related cloze research" (1994)
  18. Kintsch, W, "Towards a model of rext comprehension and production" (1978)
  19. Kletzien, S. B, "Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text at differing levels" (1991)
  20. Kobayashi, M, "Cloze tests revisited: Exploring item characteristics with special attention to scoring methods", 86(4), pp.571~586 (2003)
  21. Lee, J, "An analysis of test-taking strategies for the cloze", 57(1), pp.213~237 (2002)
  22. Markham, P. L, "The rational deletion cloze and global comprehension in German" (1985)
  23. Rumelhart, D. E, "Schemata: The building blocks of cognition" (1980)
  24. Rumelhart, D. E, "Schemata: The building blocks of cognition" (1980)
  25. Stanovich, K. E, "Interactive-compensatory model of reading" (1980)
  26. Storey, P, "Examining the test-taking process: A cognitive perspective on the discourse cloze test", 14(2), pp.214~231 (1997)
  27. Yamashita, J, "Processes of taking a gap-filling test: Comparison of skilled and less skilled EFL readers", 20(3), pp.267~293 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)