Some Notes on Grammatical Categories in English and Korean: A Functional Account
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper discusses the nature of grammatical categories in English and Korean, giving an alternative account of some key differences between them. The goal is not so much to formulate a new theory but rather to show the syntactic mirror-image of the two languages clearly, with most ideas indebted to observations in generative grammar. It is assumed a priori that grammatical categories derive from mutual needs and the needs are represented being inherent to the lexical item when it undergoes syntactic operations. In particular, we try to deduce the EPP constraint in English on a functional basis, reasoning it out as part of a system that works closely with word order, auxiliary verbs, declaration/question formation, and adverb position.
Abstract
This paper discusses the nature of grammatical categories in English and Korean, giving an alternative account of some key differences between them. The goal is not so much to formulate a new theory but rather to show the syntactic mirror-image of the two languages clearly, with most ideas indebted to observations in generative grammar. It is assumed a priori that grammatical categories derive from mutual needs and the needs are represented being inherent to the lexical item when it undergoes syntactic operations. In particular, we try to deduce the EPP constraint in English on a functional basis, reasoning it out as part of a system that works closely with word order, auxiliary verbs, declaration/question formation, and adverb position.
참고문헌 (22)
- Adger, D, "Core syntax: A minimalist approach" (2003), Oxford University Press
- Baker, M, "Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing" (1988), University of Chicago Press
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Chomsky, N, "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries: The framework, In Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~155 (1998), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N., "Derivation by phase, In Ken Hale: A life in language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
- Chomsky, N, "The sound pattern of English" (1968), Harper & Row
- Fodor, J. A., "The modularity of mind" (1983), MIT Press
- Fodor, J. D., "Setting syntactic parameters, In The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory", pp.730~769 (2001), Blackwell
- Gazdar, G, "Generalized phrase structure grammar" (1985), Harvard University Press
- Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure" (1995), The University of Chicago Press
- Haegeman, L., "Introduction to government and binding theory" (1994), Blackwell
- Halle, M., "Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection, In The view from building 20", pp.111~176 (1993), MIT Press
- Hauser, M. D, "The faculty of language: What is it? Who has it? and How did it evolve?", Science, 22, pp.1569~1579 (2002)
- Hale, K., "On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations, In The view from building 20", pp.53~108 (1993), MIT Press
- Huang, C. T. J., "On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns", Linguistic Inquiry, 15, pp.531~544 (1984)
- Jackendoff, R., "X-bar syntax" (1977), MIT Press
- Jackendoff, R, "Semantic structures" (1991), MIT Press
- Kayne, R. S., "The antisymmetry of syntax" (1994), MIT Press
- Larson, R., "On the double object construction", Linguistic Inquiry, 19, pp.335~392 (1988)
- Levelt, W. J. M, "Speaking: From intention to articulation" (1989), MIT Press
- Saito, M, "Order in phrase structure and movement", Linguistic Inquiry, 29, pp.439~474 (1998)