한국인 화자들의 음절화와 음성실현의괴리에 따른 함축적 관계 규명
Analysis of the Implication Relation between Syllabification and Phonetic Realization in Korean Speakers
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to investigate how Korean and English speakers syllabify two-syllable English words with single intervocalic consonants in written and listening tasks. Through analyses of Korean and English speakers, I tried to identify whether their syllabification was affected by phonological factors of stress position, vowel length, and consonant type. For this, I classified responses of both subjects into response 1(e.g., col/or), response 2(e.g., co/lor), and response 1-2(e.g., co-l-or). In written tasks, both English and Korean speakers mostly tended to put intervocalic consonants in the second stressed syllable, which follows the Maximal Onset Principle. But, while English speakers were generally influenced by consonant type, vowel length, and stress, Koreans were affected only by consonant type, especially nasals and obstruents, regardless of stress position or vowel length. In listening tasks, responses of 1 and 2 in both speakers showed almost identical patterns witnessed in those of the written tasks. However, in response 1-2, English speakers were affected by vowel length and stress position, but Koreans were strongly influenced by consonant type, that is, liquids, which reflected the influence of the syllable structure of their native language.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to investigate how Korean and English speakers syllabify two-syllable English words with single intervocalic consonants in written and listening tasks. Through analyses of Korean and English speakers, I tried to identify whether their syllabification was affected by phonological factors of stress position, vowel length, and consonant type. For this, I classified responses of both subjects into response 1(e.g., col/or), response 2(e.g., co/lor), and response 1-2(e.g., co-l-or). In written tasks, both English and Korean speakers mostly tended to put intervocalic consonants in the second stressed syllable, which follows the Maximal Onset Principle. But, while English speakers were generally influenced by consonant type, vowel length, and stress, Koreans were affected only by consonant type, especially nasals and obstruents, regardless of stress position or vowel length. In listening tasks, responses of 1 and 2 in both speakers showed almost identical patterns witnessed in those of the written tasks. However, in response 1-2, English speakers were affected by vowel length and stress position, but Koreans were strongly influenced by consonant type, that is, liquids, which reflected the influence of the syllable structure of their native language.
참고문헌 (22)
- 오관영, "멀티교육을 통한 영어 학습 향상에 대한 연구", 현대영어교육, 5, pp.100~130 (2004)
- Kwan-Young Oh, "A study on the improvement of English pronunciation throughsound experimental analysis", 음성음운형태론연구, 13(3), pp.497~520 (2007), 한국음운론학회
- 오관영, "영어자음의 음성분석을 통한 조음의 유사성과 음성인식의 차이 및 단서 규명을 위한 실험연구", 언어, 35(3), pp.703~742 (2010), 한국언어학회
- Content, A., "Boundaries versus onsets in syllabic segmentation", Journal of Memory and Language, 45, pp.177~199 (2001)
- Cutler, A., "The periodicity bias", Journal of Phonetics, 21, pp.103~108 (1993)
- Cutler, A., "The syllable's differing role in the segmentation of French and English", Journal of Memory and Language, 25, pp.385~400 (1986)
- Cutler, A., "The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access", Journal of Experimental Psychology : Human Perception and Performance, 14, pp.113~121 (1988)
- Derwing, B. L., "A"pause-break"task for eliciting syllable boundary judgments from literate and illiterate speakers : Preliminary results for five diverse languages", Language and Speech, 35, pp.219~235 (1992)
- Hoard, J. B., "Aspiration, tenseness, and syllabification in English", Language, 47, pp.133~140 (1971)
- Hooper, J. B., "The syllable in phonological theory", Language, 48, pp.525~540 (1972)
- Ishikawa, K., "Syllabification of intervocalic consonants by English and Japanese speakers", Language and Speech, 45(4), pp.355~385 (2002)
- Jenkins, J., "The phonology of English as an international language: New models, new norms, new goals" (2000), Oxford University Press
- Kahn, D., "Syllable-based generalizations in English phonology" (1976), Academic Press
- Kemp, M., "Syllabification", College English, 18(4), pp.202~207 (1957)
- Phonetic cues to syllabification, "Maddieson, I.", UCLA, 85~98, pp.UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 59 (1984)
- McQueen, J. M., "Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics", Journal of Memory and Language, 39, pp.21~46 (1998)
- Powell, M., "Word division", English Studies, 65(5), pp.452~458 (1984)
- Pulgram, E., "Syllable, word, nexus, cursus" (1970), Mounton
- Selkirk, E., "The syllable, In The structure of phonological representations, Part II", pp.337~383 (1982), Foris
- Smith, K. L., "Phonological and morphological influences in the syllabification of spoken words", Journal of Memory and Language, 41, pp.199~222 (1999)
- Treiman, R., "Experimental studies of English syllabification", Proceedings of the 6th International Phonology Meeting, pp.273~281 (1988)
- Treiman, R., "Syllabification of intervocalic consonants", Journal of Memory and Language, 27, pp.87~104 (1988)