Positive Stripping Construction in English and Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The positive stripping construction (PSC) in English and Korean is comprised of several fragments (and) NP too/(kuliko) NP[-to] but delivers a full sentential meaning. To account for such a form-meaning mismatch, we examine the similarities and differences in the properties of the PSC between the two languages. Based on the properties we observed, we argue that our Construction-Grammar based analysis under the Direct Interpretation Approach can sufficiently explain the properties of the stripping in the two languages, showing the problems of the Focus Phrase-based analysis under the Movement-and-Ellipsis Approach. Moreover, it is argued that our analysis will lead to a simpler explanation for further stripping data.
Abstract
The positive stripping construction (PSC) in English and Korean is comprised of several fragments (and) NP too/(kuliko) NP[-to] but delivers a full sentential meaning. To account for such a form-meaning mismatch, we examine the similarities and differences in the properties of the PSC between the two languages. Based on the properties we observed, we argue that our Construction-Grammar based analysis under the Direct Interpretation Approach can sufficiently explain the properties of the stripping in the two languages, showing the problems of the Focus Phrase-based analysis under the Movement-and-Ellipsis Approach. Moreover, it is argued that our analysis will lead to a simpler explanation for further stripping data.
참고문헌 (17)
- Boas, H., "Sign-based construction grammar", pp.2012, CSLI Publications
- 조세연, "“왜-XP?” 구문의 특성: 직접 해석 접근법을 중심으로", 인문과학연구, (55), pp.97~120 (2017), 인문과학연구소
- Chomsky, N., "Semantics: An interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology" (1971), Cambridge University Press
- Depiante, M., "The syntax of deep and surface anaphora: A study of null complement anaphora and stripping", bare argument ellipsis, University of Connecticut, 2000
- Ginzburg, J., "The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation" (2012), Oxford University Press
- Ginzburg, J., "Interrogative investigations" (2000), CSLI Publications
- 김종복, "Fragments in Korean: A Direct Interpretation Approach", 생성문법연구, 25(3), pp.703~733 (2015), 한국생성문법학회[DOI]
- Kim, S. -J., "English stripping construction: A constructiongrammar based account", Ph.D, pp.2018
- 김소지, "영어 긍정 최소 공백화 구문: 직접 해석 접근법을 중심으로", 언어학, 26(1), pp.75~96 (2018), 대한언어학회[DOI]
- 김소지, "영어 부정 스트리핑 구문의 중의성 해소에 관한 연구: 직접 해석 접근법을 중심으로", 비교문화연구, 52, pp.393~416 (2018), 비교문화연구소[DOI]
- 김소지, "VP-ellipsis, Stripping, and the Functions of the Delimiter –to in Korean", 언어와 정보, 20(1), pp.93~110 (2016), 한국언어정보학회
- Lobeck, A., "Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification" (1995), Oxford University Press
- Merchant, J., "Remarks on stripping: Section excised from submitted version of fragments and ellipsis" (2003), University of Chicago
- Potter, D., "The island (in)sensitivity of stripping", Ph.D, pp.2017
- Ross, J., "Constraints on variables in syntax", Doctor, pp.1967
- Selkirk, E., "The handbook of phonological theory", pp.550~569 (1995), Blackwell
- Turk, A., "Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words", Journal of Phonetics, 35(4), pp.445~472 (2007)