Explaining Sales Concentration in the NFT Art Market: Trading Price, Market Activity, and Changing User Composition
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In the years following the emergence of the NFT art market, there has been growing enthusiasm and skepticism regarding its potential as a competitive alternative that addresses significant disparities prevalent in the conventional art world. By identifying patterns and driving forces behind sales concentration, this paper aims to present a preliminary assessment of the NFT art market as a viable alternative market model. Building on behavioral theories of economic action, we propose that under high levels of market uncertainty and product ambiguity, participants tend to rely on information heuristics continuously generated through complex interactions among market participants. Utilizing data from a leading NFT art platform, we empirically investigate the influence of endogenous factors such as overall trading price, the level of market activity, and changing user composition, as well as the impact of cryptocurrency prices. We observed a general declining trend in sales concentration,coupled with notable periodic fluctuations. Our multivariate time-series analyses reveal that sales concentrations at the token, creator, and collector levels are influenced not only by changes in Ethereum prices but also by endogenous factors like average trading price and the influx of new participants. Furthermore, the study highlights a notable negative feedback loop between sales concentration and average trading prices, suggesting that sales concentration and trading prices suppress, rather than reinforce, each other, thereby heightening market volatility. While the NFT art market is still in its formative stage, our study provides initial insights into its dynamic characteristics and potential as a viable art market model.
Abstract
In the years following the emergence of the NFT art market, there has been growing enthusiasm and skepticism regarding its potential as a competitive alternative that addresses significant disparities prevalent in the conventional art world. By identifying patterns and driving forces behind sales concentration, this paper aims to present a preliminary assessment of the NFT art market as a viable alternative market model. Building on behavioral theories of economic action, we propose that under high levels of market uncertainty and product ambiguity, participants tend to rely on information heuristics continuously generated through complex interactions among market participants. Utilizing data from a leading NFT art platform, we empirically investigate the influence of endogenous factors such as overall trading price, the level of market activity, and changing user composition, as well as the impact of cryptocurrency prices. We observed a general declining trend in sales concentration,coupled with notable periodic fluctuations. Our multivariate time-series analyses reveal that sales concentrations at the token, creator, and collector levels are influenced not only by changes in Ethereum prices but also by endogenous factors like average trading price and the influx of new participants. Furthermore, the study highlights a notable negative feedback loop between sales concentration and average trading prices, suggesting that sales concentration and trading prices suppress, rather than reinforce, each other, thereby heightening market volatility. While the NFT art market is still in its formative stage, our study provides initial insights into its dynamic characteristics and potential as a viable art market model.
참고문헌 (55)
- Abrahamson, Eric, "Management fashion : Lifecycles, triggers, and collective learning processes", Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), pp.708~740 (1999)
- Ante, Lennart, "Non-fungible token (NFT)markets on the ethereum blockchain: Temporal development, cointegration and interrelations", Economics of Innovation and New Technology, pp.1~19 (2022)
- Banerjee, Abhijit V., "A simple model of herd behavior", The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), pp.797~817 (1992)
- Barnett, William P., "The red queen, success bias, and organizational inertia", Management Science, 54(7), pp.1237~1251 (2008)
- Baum, Joel AC, "Making the next move : How experiential and vicarious learning shape the locations of chains’ acquisitions", Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4), pp.766~801 (2000)
- Becerra, Manuel, "Why are firms with lower performance more volatile and unpredictable? A vulnerability explanation of the Bowman paradox", Organization Science, 32(5), pp.1327~1345 (2021)
- Benders, Jos, "What's in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions", Organization, 8(1), pp.33~53 (2001)
- Benner, Mary J., "Process management and technological innovation : A longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries", Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4), pp.676~707 (2002)
- Bergh, Donald D., "Learning how to restructure : Absorptive capacity and improvisational views of restructuring actions and performance", Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), pp.593~616 (2008)
- Bikhchandani, Sushil, "A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades", Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), pp.992~1026 (1992)
- Camerer, Colin, "Recent developments in modeling preferences : Uncertainty and ambiguity", Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), pp.325~370 (1992)
- Chiles, Todd H., "Organizational emergence : The origin and transformation of Branson, Missouri’s musical theaters", Organization Science, 15(5), pp.499~519 (2004)
- Coleman, James S, "Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge" (1994), Harvard University Press
- Cyert, Richard M., "A Behavioral Theory of the Firm" (1963), Prentice-Hall
- David, Robert J., "When fashion is fleeting : Transitory collective beliefs and the dynamics of TQM consulting", Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), pp.215~233 (2006)
- DiMaggio, Paul, "The Iron Cage Revisited : Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", American Sociological Review, 48(2), pp.147~160 (1983)
- Dowling, Michael, "Fertile LAND : Pricing non-fungible token", Finance Research Letters, 44, pp.102096~ (2022)
- Dowling, Michael, "Is non-fungible token pricing driven by cryptocurrencies?", Finance Research Letters, 44, pp.102097~ (2022)
- Feldman, Martha S., "Information in organizations as signal and symbol", Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(2), pp.11~186 (1981)
- Gavetti, Giovanni, "Perspective—Neo-Carnegie : The Carnegie School’s past, present, and reconstructing for the future", Organization Science, 18(3), pp.523~536 (2007)
- Giroux, Hélène, "‘It was such a handy term’ : Management fashions and pragmatic ambiguity", Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), pp.1227~1260 (2006)
- Granovetter, Mark, "Threshold models of collective behavior", American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), pp.1420~1443 (1978)
- Hannan, Michael T., "Organization Ecology" (1989), Harvard University Press
- Haunschild, Pamela R., "Modes of interorganizationalimitation : The effects of outcome salience and uncertainty", Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), pp.472~500 (1997)
- Haveman, Heather A., "Follow the leader : Mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets", Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), pp.593~627 (1993)
- Hirsch, Paul M., "Processing fads and fashions : An organization-set analysis of cultural industry systems", American Journal of Sociology, 77(4), pp.639~659 (1972)
- Hoffman, Andrew J., "Not all events are attended equally : Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events", Organization Science, 12(4), pp.414~434 (2001)
- Huddart, Steven, "Volume and price patterns around a stock’s 52-week highs and lows : Theory and evidence", Management Science, 55(1), pp.16~31 (2009)
- Raja Nabeel-Ud-Din JALAL, "Herding Behavior and Cryptocurrency: Market Asymmetries, Inter-Dependency and Intra-Dependency", The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(7), pp.27~34 (2020), 한국유통과학회
- "The Korean Academic Society of Business Administration", 2023, ~
- Knudsen, Thorbjørn, "Two faces of search : Alternative generation and alternative evaluation", Organization Science, 18(1), pp.39~54 (2007)
- Lampel, Joseph, "Experiencing the improbable : Rare events and organizational learning", Organization Science, 20(5), pp.835~845 (2009)
- March, James G., "Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice", The Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), pp.587~608 (1978)
- March, James G., "Organizations" (1993), John Wiley & Sons
- Nadini, Matthieu, "Mapping the NFT revolution : market trends, trade networks, and visual features", Scientific reports, 11(1), pp.1~11 (2021)
- Negro, Giacomo, "Category signaling and reputation", Organization Science, 26(2), pp.584~600 (2015)
- Nelson, Phillip, "Advertising as information", Journalof Political Economy, 82(4), pp.729~754 (1974)
- Noseworthy, Theodore J., "How context shapes category inferences and attribute preference for new ambiguous products", Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(4), pp.529~544 (2012)
- Park, Andrew, "The evolution of nonfungible tokens : Complexity and novelty of NFT use-cases", IT Professional, 24(1), pp.9~14 (2022)
- Petkova, Antoaneta P., "Reputation and decision making under ambiguity : A study of US venture capital firms’ investments in the emerging clean energy sector", Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), pp.422~448 (2014)
- Radermecker, Allne-Sophie V., "Questioning the NFT revolution within the art ecosystem", Arts, 12(1), pp.1~17 (2023)
- "How NFTs changed the art world, Right Click Save" (2022)[URL]
- Samdanis, Marios, "Uncertainty, strategic sensemaking and organisational failure in the art market : What went wrong with LVMH's investment in Phillips auctioneers?", Journal of Business Research, 98, pp.475~488 (2019)
- Schwab, Andreas, "Incremental organizational learning from multilevel information sources : Evidence for cross-level interactions", OrganizationScience, 18(2), pp.233~251 (2007)
- Simon, Herbert A., "A behavioral model of rational choice", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), pp.99~118 (1955)
- Simon, Herbert A., "Bounded rationality and organizational learning", Organization Science, 2(1), pp.125~134 (1991)
- "Will NFTs transform the art world? Are they even art?" (2021)[URL]
- Spence, Michael, "Competitive and optimal responses to signals : An analysis of efficiency and distribution", Journal of Economic Theory, 7(3), pp.296~332 (1974)
- Strang, David, "In search of excellence : Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation", American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), pp.147~182 (2001)
- Vasan, Kishore, "Quantifying NFT-driven networks in crypto art", Scientific reports, 12(1), pp.1~11 (2022)
- "NFT Sales Are Flatlining: Is this the beginning of the end of NFTs?" (2022)[URL]
- Yousaf, Imran, "Static and dynamic connectedness between NFTs, defi and other assets : Portfolio implication", Global Finance Journal, 53, pp.100719~ (2022)
- Williamson, Oliver E., "Transaction cost economics and the Carnegie connection", Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 31(2), pp.149~155 (1996)
- Zuckerman, Ezra W., "The Categorical imperative : Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount", American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), pp.1398~1438 (1999)
- Zuckerman, Ezra W., "The critical trade-off : Identity assignment and box-office success in the feature film industry", Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(1), pp.27~67 (2003)
