How to Numerate and What to Compute: An Alternative Approach to Solve the Late Merge of Adjunct

키워드

참고문헌 (38)

1. Bowers, J., "Syntactic Relations", 석사, pp.2005
2. Chomsky, N., "A miniamlsit program for linguistic theory in : The View from Building 20: Essays in linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger", pp.1~52 (1993), MIT Press
3. Chomsky, N., "The minimalist program" (1995), MIT Press
4. Chomsky, N., "Minimalist inquiries: The framework in : Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~115 (2000), MIT Press
5. Chomsky, N., "Beyond explanatory adequacy" (2001), MITOPL 20
6. Chomsky, N., "On phases", 석사, pp.2004
7. Dik, .S., "The Theory of Functional Grammar" (1989), Dordrecht Netherlands
8. Fox, D., "Condition A and scope reconstruction", LI, 35, pp.475~485 (2004)
9. Fox, D., "Extraposition and scope: A case for overt QR", WCCFL 18: Proceedings of the 18th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, pp.132~144 (1999)
10. Fox,D & J.Nissenbaum, "Condition A and scope reconstruction", 석사, pp.2002
11. Frampton, J., "Crash-proof syntax in : Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program", pp.90~105 (2002), Blackwell
12. Grohmann, K. K., "Prolific peripheries: A radical view from the left", 박사, pp.2000
13. Grohmann, K. K., "Successive cyclicity under (anti-)local considerations. Syntax 6.3", ~ (2003)
14. Hornstein, N., "Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal" (2001), Blackwell
15. Im, C. G., "Typology of multiple wh-phrases and Multiple Spheres Hypothesis", 2003 The Linguistic Association of Korea Spring Conference, pp.133~142 (2003)
16. Im, C. G., "An alternative approach to Holmberg's stylistic movement", 2004 The Society of Modern Grammar Spring Conference, pp.108~118 (2004)
17. Im, C. G., "Derivational economy and Multiple Spheres Hypothesis", Journal of Linguistic Science, 30, pp.277~298 (2004)
18. Im, C. G., "Interpretation vs. Generation of -self", Studies in Modern Grammar, 44, pp.91~119 (2006)
19. Im, C. G., "Move is Occur; the first step to eliminate movement", The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 15(4), pp.197~221 (2007)
20. 임채경, "분리주어의 주어상승분석에 대한 대안", 현대문법연구, 53(53), pp.39~55 (2008), 현대문법학회
21. Im, C. G., "Late Merge; Remerge or Survival?", The Proceedings of 2008 BALLAK and NAELL joint conference, pp.81~95 (2008)
22. Where does the Binding Theory apply?, "Lebeaux, D.", University of Maryland, 63~88, pp.Working Papers in Linguistics 3 (1995)
23. Platzack, C., "Multiple interfaces", 석사, pp.1998
24. Putnam, M., "Eliminating Agree", 석사, pp.2006
25. Reinhart, T., "Reflexivity", LI, 24, pp.657~720 (1993)
26. Reinhart, T., "The Lexicon-syntax parameter: reflexivization and other arity operation", LI, 36, pp.3~ (2005)
27. Reinhart, T., "Interface Strategies: Reference-set Computation" (2006), MIT Press
28. Reuland, E., "Primitives of Binding", LI, 32, pp.439~492 (2001)
29. Reuland, E., "Binding conditions: How are they derived?", Utrecht institute of linguistics OTS Proceedings of the HPSG 05 Conference (2005)
30. Rizzi, L., "The fine structure of the left periphery in : Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax", pp.281~337 (1997), Kluwer
31. Rubin, E., "Determining Pair-Merge", LI, 34, pp.660~668 (2003)
32. Stroik, T., "The survive principle", Linguistic Analysis, 29, pp.278~303 (1999)
33. Stroik, T., "Locality in Minimalist Syntax", MIT Press
34. Stroik, T., "Surviving Reconstruction", The Proceedings of Interphases (2006)
35. "석사", University of Missouri-Kansas City and University of Michigan
36. Uriagereka, J., "Multiple Spell-Out" (1999), MIT Press
37. Zhang, N., "Move is remerge", Language and Linguistics, 5(1), pp.189~209 (2004)
38. Zubizaretta, M. L., "Prosody, Focus, and Word Order" (1998), MIT Press

관련 논문AI추천