본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Religious Traditions as Pieces in a Jigsaw Puzzle? Reflection on Jeffery Long’s Neo-Vedantic Pluralistic Theology from a Christian Theological Perspective

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

We live in a challenging situation in which different religious traditions make competing and conflicting truth-claims. Many theologians in diverse traditions have been trying to respond to this situation in their own ways. In his essay “(Tentatively) Putting the Pieces Together: Comparative Theology in the Tradition of Sri Ramakrishna,” Jeffery Long articulates his Neo-Vedantic pluralistic theology by using Pravrajika Vrajaprana’s metaphor of “a giant jigsaw puzzle” and his own engagement with Jain and process thought. The aim of the present paper is to examine and to evaluate Long’s Neo-Vedantic pluralistic theology from a Christian theological perspective. First, I argue that Christian theological and modern scientific criticism of process thought undermines the adequacy of his engagement with it. I also claim that pragmatists’ insight into the interpretive nature of human experience undermines the Jain doctrine of two truths. Finally, I point out that Long’s pluralistic theology has a difficulty in articulating the place of an exclusivist religion and the role of divine revelation and the agency of God.

Abstract

We live in a challenging situation in which different religious traditions make competing and conflicting truth-claims. Many theologians in diverse traditions have been trying to respond to this situation in their own ways. In his essay “(Tentatively) Putting the Pieces Together: Comparative Theology in the Tradition of Sri Ramakrishna,” Jeffery Long articulates his Neo-Vedantic pluralistic theology by using Pravrajika Vrajaprana’s metaphor of “a giant jigsaw puzzle” and his own engagement with Jain and process thought. The aim of the present paper is to examine and to evaluate Long’s Neo-Vedantic pluralistic theology from a Christian theological perspective. First, I argue that Christian theological and modern scientific criticism of process thought undermines the adequacy of his engagement with it. I also claim that pragmatists’ insight into the interpretive nature of human experience undermines the Jain doctrine of two truths. Finally, I point out that Long’s pluralistic theology has a difficulty in articulating the place of an exclusivist religion and the role of divine revelation and the agency of God.

참고문헌 (11)

  1. Barth, Karl, "Church Dogmatics, I.2" (1956), T&T Clark
  2. Clooney, Francis X., "Comparative Theology: Deep Learning Across Religious Borders" (2010), Wiley-Blackwell
  3. Clooney, Francis X., "The New Comparative Theology", pp.191~200 (2010), T&T Clark
  4. Fiorenza, Francis Schüssler, "Religious Experience and Contemporary Theological Epistemolog", pp.183~218 (2005), Lueven University Press
  5. Grenz, Stanley J., "20th Century Theology: God and the World in a Transitional Age" (1992), InterVarsity Press
  6. Lamberth, David, "Putting ‘Experience’ to the Test in Theological Reflection", Harvard Theological Review, 93(1), pp.67~77 (2000)
  7. Long, Jeffery D., "The New Comparative Theology", pp.151~170 (2010), T&T Clark
  8. Min, Anselm K., "The Solidarity of Others in a Divided World: A Postmodern Theology After Postmodernism" (2004), T&T Clark
  9. Polkinghorne, John, "Belief in God in an Age of Science" (1998), Yale University Press
  10. Thiemann, Ronald, "Revelation and Imaginative Construction", The Journal of Religion, 61(3), pp.242~263 (1981)
  11. Whitehead, Alfred North, "Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology" (1978), Free Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)