향가의 서정주체와 불국사·석굴암의 조성 방식
Lyricism subject of Hyang-ga and development of Bulguksa and Seokguram
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis is composed to inquire into the role of Hyang-ga during the process of GyeongJu, capital of Silla becoming religious shrine in the lyricism subject. I suggest a principle for foundation of the Bulguksa and Seokguram temples, which both represent the art history of the Silla Dynasty through four songs of Hyang-ga in the temples of Chungdamsa and Wolmyeongsa which come from the same period of King Gyeong Deok era. I found the clue on how to approach the ‘shrine’ conceived by the nation of Silla. The results of the argument are like the following. First, the point which claims our attention is the aesthetic quality of Hyang-ga. This quality does not manifeste itself simply by examining spatial image and contents of the Hyang-ga. Second, the difference between rhetorical methods of Chungdamsa and Wolmyeongsa had a chance to be revealed. There is the aspect that reminds us of the difference of Bulguksa and Seokguram between those methods. Chungdamsa had accepted conventional poetic diction and ascribed ‘general’ and ‘abstract’ symbolism into all kinds of subject which were then categorized. Wolmyeongsa had synthesized the poetic diction with other lexicon to attempt to emphasize the specific and heuristic symbols. Third, it has revealed that the attempts of Chungdamsa and Wolmyeongsa had more significant meaning than revelation of rhetorical method.
Abstract
This thesis is composed to inquire into the role of Hyang-ga during the process of GyeongJu, capital of Silla becoming religious shrine in the lyricism subject. I suggest a principle for foundation of the Bulguksa and Seokguram temples, which both represent the art history of the Silla Dynasty through four songs of Hyang-ga in the temples of Chungdamsa and Wolmyeongsa which come from the same period of King Gyeong Deok era. I found the clue on how to approach the ‘shrine’ conceived by the nation of Silla. The results of the argument are like the following. First, the point which claims our attention is the aesthetic quality of Hyang-ga. This quality does not manifeste itself simply by examining spatial image and contents of the Hyang-ga. Second, the difference between rhetorical methods of Chungdamsa and Wolmyeongsa had a chance to be revealed. There is the aspect that reminds us of the difference of Bulguksa and Seokguram between those methods. Chungdamsa had accepted conventional poetic diction and ascribed ‘general’ and ‘abstract’ symbolism into all kinds of subject which were then categorized. Wolmyeongsa had synthesized the poetic diction with other lexicon to attempt to emphasize the specific and heuristic symbols. Third, it has revealed that the attempts of Chungdamsa and Wolmyeongsa had more significant meaning than revelation of rhetorical method.
참고문헌 (25)
- 金容濟, "慶州邑誌 권3" (1933), 津津堂
- 一然, "三國遺事", 고려대 만송문고
- 김완진, "향가와 고려가요" (2000), 서울대 출판부
- 김완진, "향가해독법연구" (1980), 서울대 출판부
- 서철원, "향가의 역사와 문화사", pp.146~157 (2011), 지식과교양
- 장충식, "한국불교미술연구", pp.70~ (2004), 시공사
- 최준식, "신라가 빚은 예술 경주", pp.119~ (2010), 한울아카데미
- 김상태, "신라시대 가람의 구성원리와 밀교적 상관관계 연구", 박사, pp.2004
- 김상현, "만파식적설화의 유교적 정치사상, 신라의 사상과 문화", pp.83~ (1999), 일지사
- 김상현, "신라삼보의 불교사상적 의미, 신라의 사상과 문화", pp.55~ (1999), 일지사
- 김승호, "성소 만들기와 설화의 구조 - 遺事 소재 창사연기설화를 중심으로, In 삼국유사의 현장적 연구", pp.293~315 (1990), 동국대 신라문화연구소
- 김영태, "석굴암의 교리적 이해", 정신문화연구, 15(3), pp.98~ (1992), 한국정신문화연구원
- 문명대, "불국사 불교미술의 종합적 연구", 강좌 미술사, 12, pp.18~22 (1999), 한국미술사연구소
- 문명대, "토함산석굴 본존불의 명칭, In 토함산석굴", pp.308~ (2000), 한국언론자료간행회
- 문명대, "양지와 그의 작품론, 원음과 적조미", pp.13~35 (2003), 예경
- 문명대, "토함산석굴의 조성사상과 구성원리, In 토함산석굴", pp.212~218 (2000), 한국언론자료간행회
- 서철원, "향가와 신라문화사, 향가의 깊이와 아름다움", pp.100~ (2009), 보고사
- 신동하, "신라 불국토사상과 황룡사, In 황룡사의 종합적 고찰", pp.57~59 (2001), 동국대 신라문화연구소
- 신종원, "신라 불교 전래의 제양상, In 신라초기불교사연구", pp.133~135 (1992), 민족사
- 신창수, "중고기 왕경의 사찰과 도시계획, In 신라 왕경 연구", pp.137~ (1995), 동국대 신라문화연구소
- 염중섭, "불교의 가람배치와 불국사에 대한 재조명", pp.56~ (2009), 한국학술정보
- 이만, "불국사 건립의 사상적 배경, 불국사의 종합적 고찰", pp.15~ (1997), 동국대 신라문화연구소
- 장충식, "토함산 석굴의 點定과 그 배경, In 석굴암의 신연구", pp.88~89 (2000), 동국대 신라문화연구소
- 최광식, "신라 상대 왕경의 祭場, In 신라 왕경 연구", pp.81~82 (1995), 동국대 신라문화연구소
- 황수영, "삼국유사와 불교미술, In 삼국유사의 신연구", pp.22~25 (1980), 동국대 신라문화연구소
