보그다노프와 사회시스템의 문제
Bogdanov and Social System Problem
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
A. A. Bogdanov is nearly not only introduced comparing to Lenin in the history of Russian revolution, but also even more erased as a Machist. His various careers as a novelist, physicist, philosopher, economist, activist has been nearly not introduced until now. Furthermore his organizational theory is nearly not investigated because a successor overshadowes him in a field of system theory. But his organizational theory called Tectology began to be newly highlighted after 1980's years in the west and 1970's in the Russia. His organizational theory began to be recognized as a pioneer work followed Bertalanffy, Luhmann etc in the sphere of contemporary system theory. This study aims at elucidating the theoretical aspects of Bogdanov's tectology as a system theory more concretely by explaining the history to receive Bogdanov's organizational theory as a system theory before and after Bertalanffy. As noted, there were many theorists after Bogdanov's tectology as a system theory. They mainly investigated a system theory not in the aspect of system theory itself but sociology. Of course their theory often includes biological influence like Luhmann. We can see it in the Bogdanov's tectology. But Bogdanov's organizational theory is differentiated from their system theory. First his organizational theory is very dynamic comparing to other static, structural - functional theories. Second a revolutionary viewpoint as an activist to point to build a socialistic society is included in the Bogdanov's theory. This study strives to show the two differentiated aspects by a diagram in the above text and how a new society to overcome a capitalistic society appears through a destruction of an organizational boundary and what is needed for an establishment of a new society.
Abstract
A. A. Bogdanov is nearly not only introduced comparing to Lenin in the history of Russian revolution, but also even more erased as a Machist. His various careers as a novelist, physicist, philosopher, economist, activist has been nearly not introduced until now. Furthermore his organizational theory is nearly not investigated because a successor overshadowes him in a field of system theory. But his organizational theory called Tectology began to be newly highlighted after 1980's years in the west and 1970's in the Russia. His organizational theory began to be recognized as a pioneer work followed Bertalanffy, Luhmann etc in the sphere of contemporary system theory. This study aims at elucidating the theoretical aspects of Bogdanov's tectology as a system theory more concretely by explaining the history to receive Bogdanov's organizational theory as a system theory before and after Bertalanffy. As noted, there were many theorists after Bogdanov's tectology as a system theory. They mainly investigated a system theory not in the aspect of system theory itself but sociology. Of course their theory often includes biological influence like Luhmann. We can see it in the Bogdanov's tectology. But Bogdanov's organizational theory is differentiated from their system theory. First his organizational theory is very dynamic comparing to other static, structural - functional theories. Second a revolutionary viewpoint as an activist to point to build a socialistic society is included in the Bogdanov's theory. This study strives to show the two differentiated aspects by a diagram in the above text and how a new society to overcome a capitalistic society appears through a destruction of an organizational boundary and what is needed for an establishment of a new society.
참고문헌 (27)
- A. А. Богданов, "ТЕКТОЛОГИЯ" (1989), Экономика
- 김정한, "레닌에 대해 말하지 않기" (2000), 이후
- 이득재, "레닌과 보그다노프", 현대사상, (4)
- 이득재, "소련의 프롤레트쿨트와 문화운동", 문화과학, 통권 : 53 (2008)
- 이득재, "맑스와 어소시에이션, 그리고 혁명", 문화과학, (60)
- 천호강, "문화와 주체: 레닌과 보그다노프의 비교를 중심으로", 노어노문학, 27(3), pp.205~234 (2015), 한국노어노문학회
- 천호강, "레닌과 보그다노프: 협력에서 반목으로", 현대사상, 10 (2012)
- Arran Gare, "Aleksandr Bogdanov and Systems Theory", Democracy &Nature, 6(3) (2000)
- George Gorelik, "Reemergence of Bogdanov's Tektology in Soviet Studies of Organization", The Academy of Management Journal, 18(2) (1975)
- George Gorelik, "Bogdanov's Tektologia, General Systems Theory, and Cybernetics", Cybernetics and Systems archive, 18(2) (1987)
- George Gorelik, "Bogdanov's Tektology: Its Nature, Development and Influences", Studies in Soviet Thought, 26(1) (1983)
- IlMARI SUSILUOTO, "The origins and development of systems thinking in the soviet union" (1982), Helsinki
- Milan Zeleny, "Tectology", Int. J. General Systems, 14 (1988)
- Michael M. Boll, "From Empiriocriticism to Empririomonism: The Marxist Phenomenology of Alexsandr Bogdanov", SEER, 59(1) (1981)
- Michael Csizmas, "Cybernetics, Marxism, Jurisprudence", Studies in Soviet Thought, 11(2) (1971)
- Peter Dudley, "Alexander Bogdanov and the Origins of Systems Thinking in Russia" (1998), Ashgate
- Peter Dudley, "Bogdanov's Tektology Book 1, 2" (1996), Center for Systems Studies Univ. of Hull
- Rafael E. Bello, "The systems Approach: A. Bogdanov and L. von Bertalanffy", Studies in Soviet Thought, 30(2) (1985)
- Stefan Plaggenborg, "Alexander Bogdanov Theoretiker fiir des 20" (2008), Verlag Otto SagnerMunchen
- Yuri N. Belokopytov, "General Organization Theory", Humanities ＆Social Sciences, 7 (2013)
- Zenovia Sochor, "Revolution and Culture" (1988), Cornell univ.
- Zenovia Sochor, "Was Bogdanov Russia's Answer to Gramsci?", Studies in Soviet Thought, 22(1) (1981)
- 渡部正元, "哲學の再生" (2009), 五曜書房
- 馬場竫雄, "ル-マンの社會理論" (2001), 勁草書房
- 武井昭, "社會システムと社會理論の論理構造(3)", 高崎經濟大學論集, 43(2) (2000)