Two different approaches to Sakha passives
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this article we compare two different approaches to Sakha passives. On the one hand, we consider how passives are treated in functional grammar. On the other hand, we discuss passives from a generative grammar viewpoint, particularly, how passivization is treated within the framework of Theta System. We show that within the functional grammar framework the category of the passive forms a functional semantic field which encompasses all constructions displaying passive semantics, regardless of the morphological makeup of the predicate. The field consists of the centre and the periphery. The centre includes three types of passive constructions whose predicate is marked with the regular passive morpheme. The periphery contains two types of constructions where the predicate does not bear the passive affix – causative passive constructions and object relative participial clauses. On the contrary, the generative grammar entertains a much narrower, formally restricted view of the category of the passive. Passive is considered to result from the application of the lexical argument structure operation – saturation which is morphologically reflected by the regular passive affix.
Abstract
In this article we compare two different approaches to Sakha passives. On the one hand, we consider how passives are treated in functional grammar. On the other hand, we discuss passives from a generative grammar viewpoint, particularly, how passivization is treated within the framework of Theta System. We show that within the functional grammar framework the category of the passive forms a functional semantic field which encompasses all constructions displaying passive semantics, regardless of the morphological makeup of the predicate. The field consists of the centre and the periphery. The centre includes three types of passive constructions whose predicate is marked with the regular passive morpheme. The periphery contains two types of constructions where the predicate does not bear the passive affix – causative passive constructions and object relative participial clauses. On the contrary, the generative grammar entertains a much narrower, formally restricted view of the category of the passive. Passive is considered to result from the application of the lexical argument structure operation – saturation which is morphologically reflected by the regular passive affix.
참고문헌 (28)
- Abdullina, G. R., "Herald of Cheljabinsk State Pedagogical University 30", pp.5~12 (2008), Cheljabinsk State Pedagogical University
- Almadakova, N. D., "Grammaticheskaja kategorija zaloga v altajskom jazyke" (2005), Institute of Philology SB RAS
- Apresjan, Ju. D., "Grammaticheskije kategoriji:ierarkhiji, svjazi, vzaimodejstvije", pp.7~21 (2003), Nauka
- O Jazyke Jakutov. Translated by V. I. Rassadin, "Über die Sprache der Jakuten", pp.1990, Böhtlingk, O.
- Bondarko, A. V., "O grammatike funktsional’no-semanticheskikh polej", Izvestija Akademiji Nauk SSSR, 43(6), pp.492~503 (1984)
- Bondarko, A. V., "Teorija znachenija v sisteme funktsional’noj grammatiki (na materiale russkogo jazyka)" (2002), Jazyki slavjanskikh kultur
- Bondarko, A. V., "Teorija morfologicheskikh kategorij i aspektologicheskije issledovanija" (2005), Jazyki slavjanskikh kultur
- Chomsky, N., "Lectures on government and binding" (1981), Foris
- Danilova, N. I., "Semanticheskije tipy passivnykh konstruktsij v jakutskom jazyke", Proceedings of the 11th Seoul International Altaistic conference, pp.323~340 (2013), Altai Society of Korea
- Danilova, N. I, "Funktsional’no-semanticheskije kategoriji v jakutskom jazyke. Sposoby vyrazhenija", Nauka
- Danilova, N. I., "Kurs jakutskoj grammatiki. Sistema morfologicheskikh kategorij i sintaksicheskikh konstruktsij" (2004), Triada
- Haegeman, L., "Introduction to government and binding theory" (1994), Blackwell
- Haspelmath, M., "The Grammaticization of Passive Morphology", John Benjamins, 14(1), pp.25~72 (1990)
- Juldashev, A. A., "Sravnitel’noistoricheskaja grammatika tjurkskix jazykov", pp.269~309 (1988), Nauka
- Kharitonov, L. N., "Zalogovyje formy glagola v jakutskom jazyke" (1963), Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences
- Khrakovskij, V. S., "Tipologija passivnykh konstruktsij. Diatezy i zalogi", pp.5~45 (1974), Nauka
- Kononov, A. N., "Grammatika sovremennogo turetskogo literaturnogo jazyka" (1956), Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences
- Korkina, E. I., "Grammatika sovremennogo jakutskogo literaturnogo jazyka : fonetika i morfologija. Moskva : Nauka" (1982), Nauka
- Kormushin, I. V., "Turcologica. K 70-letiju akademika A. N. Kononova", pp.89~93 (1976), Nauka
- Kornfilt, J., "Turkish" (1997), Routledge
- Nadeljaev, V. M., "Morfologija tjurkskikh jazykov Sibiri", pp.3~64 (1985), Institute of History, Philology and Philosophy
- Nasilov, D. M., "Problemy tjurkskoj aspektologiji : aktsional’nost’" (1989), Nauka
- Popova, N. I., "Kurs jakutskoj grammatiki. Sistema morfologicheskikh kategorij i sintaksicheskikh konstruktsij", pp.102~120 (2004), Triada
- The theta system: Syntactic realization of verbal concepts, "Reinhart, T.", Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, ~ (2000)
- Reinhart, T., "The Theta System – An Overview", Theoretical Linguistics, 28(3), pp.229~290 (2003), Mouton de Gruyter
- Vinokurova, N., "Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS Yearbook", pp.53~63 (2004), Utrecht Institute of Linguistics
- Vinokurova, N., "Lexical categories and argument structure: A study with reference to Sakha (LOT Dissertation Series 103)" (2005), Igitur
- Yeon, J., "SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 10", pp.249~268 (2000), School of Oriental and African Studies