카작어와 한국어의 시제 대조
Tense in Kazakh and Korean
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This article aims to investigate the morphological structure and grammatical function of tense realization in Kazakh and to draw similarities and differences vis-à-vis Korean. Below grammatical observations are found. The verbal adverb -ıp/-ip/-p used in the simple present is similar to the connectives in Korean -eo, -go, -ge, -ji. The verbal adverb -a-/-e-/-y- used in transitional present is equivalent to the suffix of present tense in Korean -neun-/-eun-. The suffixes of simple past -dı-/-di-, -tı-/-ti- correspond to the suffix of past tense in Korean -eoss-/-ass-, while the past participles used in the past perfect -ğan-/-gen-, -qan-/-ken- are similar to the suffix of past perfect tense in Korean -eosseoss-/-asseoss-. The past participles used in transitional past -atın-/-etin-, -ytın-/-ytin- or -wşı/-wşi can be compared to the constructions in Korean respectively -gon haessda(used to) and -deo-(retrospect in the past). Participles used in suppositional and intentional future are similar to the suffix of future tense in Korean -gess expressing suppositional or intentional modality. The verbal adverb -a/-e/-y used in transitional future is identical to the suffix of future tense in Korean -gess expressing modality of possibility.
Abstract
This article aims to investigate the morphological structure and grammatical function of tense realization in Kazakh and to draw similarities and differences vis-à-vis Korean. Below grammatical observations are found. The verbal adverb -ıp/-ip/-p used in the simple present is similar to the connectives in Korean -eo, -go, -ge, -ji. The verbal adverb -a-/-e-/-y- used in transitional present is equivalent to the suffix of present tense in Korean -neun-/-eun-. The suffixes of simple past -dı-/-di-, -tı-/-ti- correspond to the suffix of past tense in Korean -eoss-/-ass-, while the past participles used in the past perfect -ğan-/-gen-, -qan-/-ken- are similar to the suffix of past perfect tense in Korean -eosseoss-/-asseoss-. The past participles used in transitional past -atın-/-etin-, -ytın-/-ytin- or -wşı/-wşi can be compared to the constructions in Korean respectively -gon haessda(used to) and -deo-(retrospect in the past). Participles used in suppositional and intentional future are similar to the suffix of future tense in Korean -gess expressing suppositional or intentional modality. The verbal adverb -a/-e/-y used in transitional future is identical to the suffix of future tense in Korean -gess expressing modality of possibility.
참고문헌 (18)
- 국립국어원, "외국인을 위한 한국어 문법 1" (2005), 커뮤니케이션북스
- 권재일, "한국어 통사론" (1992), 민음사
- 권재일, "한국어 문법의 연구" (1994), 박이정
- 김필영, "한국어와 카작어의 보조용언 구문", 언어학, 30, pp.113~136 (2001), 한국언어학회
- 김필영, "한국어와 카작어의 활용어미 대조 연구", 알타이학보, (18), pp.125~145 (2008), 한국알타이학회
- 남기심, "표준 국어 문법론" (2001), 탑출판사
- 문숙영, "한국어의 시제 범주" (2009), 국어학회
- 세릭바예바 자리빠, "한국어와 카자흐어의 격표지 대조 연구", 석사, pp.2005
- 스마토바 악보타, "한국어와 카자흐어의 보조용언 구문 대조 연구", 석사, pp.2004
- Aqanova, D, "Resmï-iskerï Qazaq tili" (2002), Arman-PV
- Bekturov, Š, "Qazaq tili dlâ načinaûŝih" (1994), Rawan
- Kožahmetova,H, "40 urokov kazahskogo âzyka", Žalyn, ~ (1989)
- Kulikovskaâ, L, "Grammatika kazahskogo âzyka v tablicah i shemah" (2006), DOIVA
- Mamanov,Ï, "Qazaqtili" (1989), Mektep
- Qulmağambetova, B, "Qazaq tilin üyrenwşilerge kömek" (1990), Rawan
- Rısbaeva, G, "Qazaq tili" (2000), Sözdik-Slovar
- Tujmebaev,Ž, "Indikativnye formy glagola v kazahskom âzyke" (1992), Ana-tili
- Tüymebaev,J, "Qazaq tili, Almatı: Poligrafkombinat nacional'nogo agenstva po delam pečati i massovoj informacii", ~ (1996)