농업환경보전프로그램의 효과 검증을 위한 지표식물 선정
Selection of Indicator Plants to Evaluate the Effects of Agri-environmental Conservation Program
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
BACKGROUND: The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs is promoting agri-environment conservation program to induce farmers to participate in agricultural environment improvement and conservation activities. However, assessment tools based on scientific evidence are needed to determine the effectiveness of the program objectively and quantitatively. Therefore, this study was performed to develop plant indicators in order to efficiently evaluate the effects of the agri-environment conservation program promoted by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The survey was conducted in five regions (Hampyeong, Boryeong, Mungyeong, Hongseong, and Sangju) participating in the agri-eonvironment con-servation program. In each region, twenty paddy fields were investigated (ten paddy fields included in the program and ten paddy fields not included in the program). A total of 231 taxa vascular plants were identified in the paddy fields that were included in the agri-environment conservation program, and a total of 177 taxa were identified in the paddy fields that were not included. The average species number occurred on each field was 55.8 taxa in the fields included in the program, and 35.0 taxa in the fields not included in the program. The difference in occurring plants between two groups was found to be more higher in perennial plants than in annual plants. We selected the six groups as indicator plants through five criteria such as perennial plants and broadly occurring species, etc. to verify the effectiveness of the agri-environment conservation program: Taraxacum spp., Ixeris spp., Viola spp., Platago spp., Calystegia spp., and rare and endagered species. There was a high positive correlation between the score calculated using these indicator plants and the total number of plants species. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that it is possible to evaluate the agro-ecological environment by using indicator plants. The selected indicator plants can be effectively used to verify the effectiveness of projects such as agri-environmental conservation programs in the future.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs is promoting agri-environment conservation program to induce farmers to participate in agricultural environment improvement and conservation activities. However, assessment tools based on scientific evidence are needed to determine the effectiveness of the program objectively and quantitatively. Therefore, this study was performed to develop plant indicators in order to efficiently evaluate the effects of the agri-environment conservation program promoted by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs. METHODS AND RESULTS: The survey was conducted in five regions (Hampyeong, Boryeong, Mungyeong, Hongseong, and Sangju) participating in the agri-eonvironment con-servation program. In each region, twenty paddy fields were investigated (ten paddy fields included in the program and ten paddy fields not included in the program). A total of 231 taxa vascular plants were identified in the paddy fields that were included in the agri-environment conservation program, and a total of 177 taxa were identified in the paddy fields that were not included. The average species number occurred on each field was 55.8 taxa in the fields included in the program, and 35.0 taxa in the fields not included in the program. The difference in occurring plants between two groups was found to be more higher in perennial plants than in annual plants. We selected the six groups as indicator plants through five criteria such as perennial plants and broadly occurring species, etc. to verify the effectiveness of the agri-environment conservation program: Taraxacum spp., Ixeris spp., Viola spp., Platago spp., Calystegia spp., and rare and endagered species. There was a high positive correlation between the score calculated using these indicator plants and the total number of plants species. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that it is possible to evaluate the agro-ecological environment by using indicator plants. The selected indicator plants can be effectively used to verify the effectiveness of projects such as agri-environmental conservation programs in the future.
참고문헌 (51)
- David G, "Multifunctionality of agricultural water:Looking beyond food production and ecosystem services", Irrigation and Drainage, 55(1), pp.73~83 (2006)[DOI]
- Natuhara Y, "Ecosystem services by paddy fields as substitutes of natural wetlands in Japan", Ecological Engineering, 56, pp.97~106 (2013)[DOI]
- 2.0.CO;2,
- Tilman D, "Forecasting agriculturally driven global environmental change", Science, 292, pp.281~284 (2001)[DOI]
- Godfray HCJ, "Food security : The challenge of feeding 9 billion people", Science, 327, pp.812~818 (2010)[DOI]
- Ma SM, "Review of history and recent development of organic farming worldwide", Agricultural Sciences in China, 5, pp.169~178 (2006)[DOI]
- 한민수, "논 생태계 내 유기농법 재배 지역과 관행농법 재배 지역의 저서무척추동물군집의 특성", 한국환경농학회지, 32(1), pp.17~23 (2013), 한국환경농학회[DOI]
- Tuck SL, "Land-use intensity and the effects of organic farming on biodiversity : A hierarchical metaanalysis", Journal of Applied Ecology, 51, pp.746~755 (2014)[DOI]
- Lichtenberg EM, "A global synthesis of the effects of diversified farming systems on arthropod diversity within fields and across agricultural landscapes", Global Change Biology, 23, pp.4946~4957 (2017)[DOI]
- Elphick CS, "Conservation implications of flooding rice fields on winter waterbird communities", Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 94, pp.17~29 (2003)[DOI]
- Taft OW, "The value of agricultural wetlands as invertebrate resources for wintering shorebirds", Agriculture, Ecosystem & Environment, 110, pp.249~256 (2005)[DOI]
- Lawler SP, "Rice fields as temporary wetlands : a review", Israel Journal of Zoology, 47, pp.513~523 (2001)[DOI]
- Heink U, "What are indicators? On the definition of indicators in ecology and environmental planning", Ecological Indicators, 10, pp.584~593 (2010)[DOI]
- Holt EA, "Bioindicators : using organisms to measure environmental impacts", Nature Education Knowledge, 2, pp.8~ (2011)
- Moyle PB, "Evaluating the biotic integrity of watersheds in the Sierra Nevada, California", Conservation Biology, 12, pp.1318~1326 (1998)[DOI]
- Miller SW, "Resistance and resilience of macroinvertebrates to irrigation water withdrawals", Freshwater Biology, 52, pp.2494~2510 (2007)[DOI]
- Haring AL, "Defining and restoring biological integrity in wilderness lakes", Ecological Applications, 8, pp.71~87 (1998)[DOI]
- Pärt T, "Conservation value of semi-natural pastures in Sweden : Contrasting botanical and avian measures", Conservation Biology, 13, pp.755~765 (1999)[DOI]
- Brooks RP, "Monitoring Ecological Condition at Regional Scales", pp.131~143 (1998), Springer
- Sampson AW, "Plant indicators: concept and status", Botanical Review, 5, pp.155~206 (1939)
- Zonneveld IS, "Ecological indicators for the assessment of the quality of air, water, soil, and ecosystems", pp.207~217 (1983), Springer
- Anderson EW, "Plant indicators of effective environment", Rangelands, 8, pp.70~73 (1986)
- Rodrìguez JP, "A test for the adequacy of bioindicator taxa : Are tiger beetles(Coleoptera : Cicindelidae)appropriate indicators for monitoring the degradation of tropical forests in Venezuela?", Biological Conservation, 83, pp.69~76 (1998)[DOI]
- Rainio J, "Ground beetles(Coleoptera : Carabidae)as bioindicators", Biodiversity and Conservation, 12, pp.487~506 (2003)[DOI]
- Launer AE, "Umbrella species and the conservation of habitat fragments : A case of a threatened butterfly and a vanishing grassland ecosystem", Biological Conservation, 69, pp.145~153 (1994)[DOI]
- Daily GC, "Double keystone bird in a keystone species complex", Proceedings of the National Academhy of Sciences of the United States of America, 90, pp.592~594 (1993)[DOI]
- Bradford DF, "Bird species assemblages as indicators of biological integrity in Great Basin rangeland", Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 49, pp.1~22 (1998)[DOI]
- 김명현, "우리나라 논 경작지에 출현하는 식물상 특성", 환경생물, 37(4), pp.690~706 (2019), 한국환경생물학회[DOI]
- Boatman ND, "The Impact of Herbicides on Weed Abundance and Biodiversity", pp.85~102 (2002), DEFRA
- Brown VK, "The Impact of Herbicides on Weed Abundance and Biodiversity", pp.59~84 (2002), DEFRA
- Lee TB, "Illustrated flora of Korea", pp.1~990 (1980), Hangmunsa Press
- Lee WT, "Standard illustrations of Korean plants", pp.1~624 (1996), Academy Press
- Lee WT, "Lineamenta florae Koreae", pp.1~1688 (1996), Academy Press
- Lee TB, "Illustrated flora of Korea (1-2)" (2003), Hangmunsa press
- 김명현, "우리나라 밭 경작지에 출현하는 식물상 특성", 환경생물, 38(4), pp.528~553 (2020), 한국환경생물학회[DOI]
- Freemark K, "Impacts of agricultural herbicide use on terrestrial wildlife in temperate landscapes : A review with special reference to North America", Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 52, pp.67~91 (1995)[DOI]
- di Castri F, "Inventoring and monitoring biodiversity : A proposal for an international network", Biology International, 27, pp.1~25 (1992)
- Gerhardt A, "Bioindicator species and their use in biomonitoring", Environmental Monitoring, 1, pp.77~123 (2002)
- Niemi GJ, "Application of ecological indicators", Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 35, pp.89~111 (2004)[DOI]
- Noss RF, "Indicators for monitoring biodiversity : A hierarchical approach", Conservation Biology, 4, pp.355~364 (1990)[DOI]
- 권오도, "무경운 중묘기계이앙 재배년수 경과에 따른 잡초발생양상과 벼의 생육 및 수량", Weed&Turfgrass Science, 22(3), pp.199~206 (2002), 한국잡초학회
- 최병기, "논 잡초 멸종위기식물인 물고사리의 낙동강유역 자생지최초보고 및 군락분류", Weed & Turfgrass Science, 3(1), pp.50~55 (2014), 한국잔디학회[DOI]
- 박민완, "멸종위기 수생식물인 매화마름(Ranunculus kazusensis Makino)의 기내 신초 증식", Journal of Plant Biotechnology, 44(3), pp.325~329 (2017), 한국식물생명공학회
- 김명현, "제주도 마르형 분화구 내에 형성된 하논의 식물상과 복원 방안", 환경생물, 36(4), pp.439~455 (2018), 한국환경생물학회[DOI]
- Konietschke F, "nparcomp : An R software package for nonparametric multiple comparisons and simultaneous confidence intervals", Journal of Statistical Software, 64, pp.10~18637 (2015)
- "R: A language and environment for statistical computing" (2020)[URL]
- Katayama N, "Organic farming and associated management practices benefit multiple wildlife taxa : A large-scale field study in rice paddy landscapes", Journal of Applied Ecology, 56, pp.1970~1981 (2019)[DOI]
- 강병화, "휴경연차에 따른 휴경지 군락내 식생 특성", 한국환경농학회지, 22(1), pp.8~ (2003), 한국환경농학회
- 김명현, "꼬마잠자리 서식지의 식물상과 생활형", 한국환경농학회지, 29(2), pp.206~213 (2010), 한국환경농학회
- 심인수, "휴경연차에 따른 묵논 식생의 생태식물상 특성", 한국환경복원기술학회지, 18(4), pp.29~41 (2015), 한국환경복원기술학회[DOI]
- 양승구, "쌀 수급안정과 식량안보를 위한 친환경･저탄소 농업 전환방안", 한국유기농업학회지, 26(1), pp.99~128 (2018), 한국유기농업학회