본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

농업부산물과 우분의 병합 소화를 통한 메탄 생산

Methane Production from the Co-digestion of Cattle Manure and Agricultural Residues

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류농학

초록

Large amounts of organic wastes generated in agricultural environments such as crop residues and livestock manure adversely affect the environment. Anaerobic digestion can reduce the amount of organic wastes and convert them into energy at the same time. Efforts are being made to further increase the energy conversion efficiency by using co-anaerobic digestion using two or more substrates. Tomatoes, rice straw, cattle manure, and cattle feces (CF) were used as substrates for anaerobic digestion. Each substrate was subjected to anaerobic digestion and the cumulative biochemical methane production potential was measured, and the biodegradability was calculated. Based on the methane production, CF and tomato were further used for co-anaerobic digestion at different mixing ratios. Among the CF:tomato ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1, 1:2 produced the most methane and the synergy index was greater 1 indicating that the co-digestion of CF and tomato improved the methane production. Overall, the results showed that the methane production from cattle manure can be improved using tomato residues.

Abstract

Large amounts of organic wastes generated in agricultural environments such as crop residues and livestock manure adversely affect the environment. Anaerobic digestion can reduce the amount of organic wastes and convert them into energy at the same time. Efforts are being made to further increase the energy conversion efficiency by using co-anaerobic digestion using two or more substrates. Tomatoes, rice straw, cattle manure, and cattle feces (CF) were used as substrates for anaerobic digestion. Each substrate was subjected to anaerobic digestion and the cumulative biochemical methane production potential was measured, and the biodegradability was calculated. Based on the methane production, CF and tomato were further used for co-anaerobic digestion at different mixing ratios. Among the CF:tomato ratios of 1:1, 1:2, and 2:1, 1:2 produced the most methane and the synergy index was greater 1 indicating that the co-digestion of CF and tomato improved the methane production. Overall, the results showed that the methane production from cattle manure can be improved using tomato residues.

참고문헌 (38)

  1. Laborde D, "Agricultural subsidies and global greenhouse gas emissions", Nature Communications, 12, pp.1~9 (2021)[DOI]
  2. Koul B, "Agricultural waste management strategies for environmental sustainability", Environmental Research, 206, pp.112285~ (2022)[DOI]
  3. Shyamsundar P, "Fields on fire : Alternatives to crop residue burning in India", Science, 365, pp.536~538 (2019)[DOI]
  4. Obi F, "Agricultural waste concept, generation, utilization and management", Nigerian Journal of Technology, 35, pp.957~964 (2016)[DOI]
  5. Wang F, "Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality", The Innovation, 2, pp.100180~ (2021)[DOI]
  6. Subbarao PMV, "Anaerobic digestion as a sustainable technology for efficiently utilizing biomass in the context of carbon neutrality and circular economy", Environmental Research, 234, pp.116286~ (2023)[DOI]
  7. Bharathiraja B, "Biogas production-A review on composition, fuel properties, feed stock and principles of anaerobic digestion", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 90, pp.570~582 (2018)[DOI]
  8. Obaideen K, "Biogas role in achievement of the sustainable development goals : Evaluation, challenges, and guidelines", Journal of the Taiwan Institute of Chemical Engineers, 131, pp.104207~ (2022)[DOI]
  9. Li L, "Effect of temperature and solid concentration on anaerobic digestion of rice straw in South China", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35, pp.7261~7266 (2010)[DOI]
  10. Li P, "Evaluation of biochemical methane potential and kinetics on the anaerobic digestion of vegetable crop residues", Energies, 12, pp.26~ (2019)[DOI]
  11. Li Y, "Co-digestion of cow and sheep manure : Performance evaluation and relative microbial activity", Renewable Energy, 153, pp.553~563 (2020)[DOI]
  12. Nguyen VK, "Review on pretreatment techniques to improve anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge", Fuel, 285, pp.119105~ (2021)[DOI]
  13. Khan MU, "Improving the biogas yield of manure : Effect of pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of the recalcitrant fraction of manure", Bioresource technology, 321, pp.124427~ (2021)[DOI]
  14. Deepanraj B, "Biogas generation through anaerobic digestion process-An overview", Research Journal of Chemistry and Environment, 18, pp.80~94 (2014)
  15. Nadan MK, "Prospective of pretreatment and anaerobic digestion of dairy cow manure in Fiji", Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 98, pp.1584~1597 (2023)[DOI]
  16. Ali SS, "Exploring the potential of anaerobic co-digestion of water hyacinth and cattle dung for enhanced biomethanation and techno-economic feasibility", Fuel, 329, pp.125397~ (2022)[DOI]
  17. Montoro SB, "Anaerobic co-digestion of sweet potato and dairy cattle manure : A technical and economic evaluation for energy and biofertilizer production", Journal of Cleaner Production, 226, pp.1082~1091 (2019)[DOI]
  18. Bułkowska K, "Enhancement of biogas production from cattle manure using glycerine phase as a co-substrate in anaerobic digestion", Fuel, 317, pp.123456~ (2022)[DOI]
  19. Li Y, "Strategies to boost anaerobic digestion performance of cow manure : Laboratory achievements and their full-scale application potential", Science of The Total Environment, 755, pp.142940~ (2021)[DOI]
  20. Kunatsa T, "A review on anaerobic digestion with focus on the role of biomass co-digestion, modelling and optimisation on biogas production and enhancement", Bioresource Technology, 344, pp.126311~ (2022)[DOI]
  21. American Public Health Association(APHA), "Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater" (1998), APHA
  22. Banerjee S, "Reactor design for biogas production-A short review", Journal of Energy and Power Technology, 4, pp.1~22 (2022)[DOI]
  23. Angelidaki I, "Defining the biomethane potential(BMP)of solid organic wastes and energy crops : A proposed protocol for batch assays", Water Science and Technology, 59, pp.927~934 (2009)[DOI]
  24. 박소윤, "우분과 볏짚의 병합 혐기성 소화를 통한 메탄 생산에 대한 고찰", 한국환경농학회지, 41(2), pp.71~81 (2022), 한국환경농학회[DOI]
  25. Calabrò PS, "Anaerobic digestion of tomato processing waste : Effect of alkaline pretreatment", Journal of Environmental Management, 163, pp.49~52 (2015)[DOI]
  26. Amin FR, "Enhanced methane production and energy potential from rice straw by employing microaerobic pretreatment via anaerobic digestion", Journal of Cleaner Production, 296, pp.126434~ (2021)[DOI]
  27. Sreekrishnan TR, "Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques-A review", Bioresource Technology, 95, pp.1~10 (2004)[DOI]
  28. Puyuelo B, "Determining C", N ratios for typical organic wastes using biodegradable fractions, 2011, pp.85, 653~659
  29. Li Y, "Solid-state anaerobic digestion for methane production from organic waste", Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, pp.821~826 (2011)[DOI]
  30. Weiland P, "Biogas production : Current state and perspectives", Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85, pp.849~860 (2010)[DOI]
  31. Li Y, "Solid state anaerobic co-digestion of tomato residues with dairy manure and corn stover for biogas production", Bioresource Technology, 217, pp.50~55 (2016)[DOI]
  32. Pinela SR, "Wastes: Solutions, Treatments and Opportunities III: Selected Papers from the 5th International Conference Wastes 2019", pp.87~ (2019), CRC Press
  33. Szilágyi Á, "A comparative analysis of biogas production from tomato bio-waste in mesophilic batch and continuous anaerobic digestion systems", PLoS One, 16, pp.e0248654~ (2021)[DOI]
  34. Xiao B, "Effects of rice straw ratio on mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and rice straw mixture", Energy, 239, pp.122021~ (2022)[DOI]
  35. Li D, "Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure", Bioresource Technology, 189, pp.319~326 (2015)[DOI]
  36. Gu Y, "Effect of inoculum sources on the anaerobic digestion of rice straw", Bioresource Technology, 158, pp.149~155 (2014)[DOI]
  37. Ashekuzzaman SM, "Optimizing feed composition for improved methane yield during anaerobic digestion of cow manure based waste mixtures", Bioresource Technology, 102, pp.2213~2218 (2011)[DOI]
  38. Kim J, "Energy production from different organic wastes by anaerobic co-digestion : Maximizing methane yield versus maximizing synergistic effect", Renewable energy, 136, pp.683~690 (2019)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

우분과 볏짚의 병합 혐기성 소화를 통한 메탄 생산에 대한 고찰조흠, 박소윤, 장정아, 조은혜, 홍진경한국환경농학회 · 한국환경농학회지2022 · 제41권 제2호Potential Methane Production on Anaerobic Co-digestion of Swine Manure and Food Waste김상현, 박상원, 성시우, 신중두, 이봉훈, Jack Duangmanee, Po-Heng Lee한국환경농학회 · 한국환경농학회지2008 · 제27권 제2호Effects of hydrothermal pretreatment on methane potential of anaerobic digestion sludge cake of cattle manure containing sawdust as bedding materials김창현, Lee Jun-Hyeong, Yoon Young-Man아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2023 · 제36권 제5호Evaluation of Biogas Production Performance and Archaeal Microbial Dynamics of Corn Straw during Anaerobic Co-Digestion with Cattle Manure LiquidBenyue Zhang, Di Chen, Hairu Yu, Hongyan Zhao, Renzhe Piao, Weidong Wang, Xue Li, Zongjun Cui한국미생물·생명공학회 · Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology2016 · 제26권 제4호전과정평가 방법을 이용한 가축분뇨/음식폐기물 통합 소화형 바이오가스 시설의 온실가스 배출량 평가김창현, 남재작, 소규호, 윤영만, 이영행한국환경농학회 · 한국환경농학회지2008 · 제27권 제4호Effects of Substrate to Inoculum Ratio on the Biochemical Methane Potential of Piggery Slaughterhouse Wastes김승환, 김창현, 신국식, 윤영만아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2014 · 제27권 제4호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (22건)