부검감정서와 사망증명서상의 사인 및 사망의 종류 불일치에 대한 연구
The Discrepancy of the Cause and Manner of Death between Death Certificates and Autopsy Reports
2
조회
0
다운로드
14
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Both death certificates and postmortem examination certificates are used as proofof death. These certificates sometimes contain erroneous information but how frequentlythey do so is unknown. In particular, only a few studies have measured theaccuracy of the cause and manner of death on Korea death documents. In this study,we compared the cause and manner of death on both kinds of certificates with thoseon autopsy reports to determine the frequency of errors, and to identify way toimprove the accuracy of these certificates. In 2012, 528 autopsies were requested ofout institute, and certificates were submitted in 241 of the cases. The manner of deathwas classified as natural, unnatural, or unknown. The cause of death in the autopsyreport matched that on the death certificate in 37 of 63 cases (58.7%), and the mannerof death matched in 40 of 63 cases (63.5%). The cause of death in the autopsyreport matched that on the postmortem examination certificate in 62 of 178 cases(34.8%), and the manner of death matched in 74 of 178 cases (41.6%). Death certificatesand postmortem examination certificates are important documents. We identifiedmany incorrect reports of causes and manners of death on both kinds of documents,especially the postmortem death certificates. These inaccuracies are presumablydue to a lack of forensic information and education, as well as lack of interest onthe part of medical doctors.
Abstract
Both death certificates and postmortem examination certificates are used as proofof death. These certificates sometimes contain erroneous information but how frequentlythey do so is unknown. In particular, only a few studies have measured theaccuracy of the cause and manner of death on Korea death documents. In this study,we compared the cause and manner of death on both kinds of certificates with thoseon autopsy reports to determine the frequency of errors, and to identify way toimprove the accuracy of these certificates. In 2012, 528 autopsies were requested ofout institute, and certificates were submitted in 241 of the cases. The manner of deathwas classified as natural, unnatural, or unknown. The cause of death in the autopsyreport matched that on the death certificate in 37 of 63 cases (58.7%), and the mannerof death matched in 40 of 63 cases (63.5%). The cause of death in the autopsyreport matched that on the postmortem examination certificate in 62 of 178 cases(34.8%), and the manner of death matched in 74 of 178 cases (41.6%). Death certificatesand postmortem examination certificates are important documents. We identifiedmany incorrect reports of causes and manners of death on both kinds of documents,especially the postmortem death certificates. These inaccuracies are presumablydue to a lack of forensic information and education, as well as lack of interest onthe part of medical doctors.
참고문헌 (8)
- "Medical law. Article 17" (2013)[URL]
- Korean Medical Association, "Written instructions of a medical certificate", pp.9~10 (2003), Korean Medical Association
- Na JY, "The discrepancy of the causes of death between medical death certificates and autopsy reports", Korean J Leg Med, 33, pp.10~18 (2009)
- 나종인, "시체검안서 또는 사망진단서와 부검 후 사인의 불일치에 대한 연구 (Ⅱ)", 대한법의학회지, 36(1), pp.27~33 (2012), 대한법의학회
- Kang YS, "Survey of the causes of death on the death certificates of DOA patients", J Korean Soc Emerg Med, 12, pp.385~392 (2001)
- 옥택근, "시체검안서 작성을 위한 사망 원인 조사 방법에 관한 연구", 대한응급의학회지, 17(3), pp.245~253 (2006), 대한응급의학회
- Yun JJ, "Forensic medicine", pp.8~9 (1995), Korea Medical Publisher
- Roulson J, "Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology : a meta-analysis and review", Histopathology, 47, pp.551~559 (2005)
