본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

광산지역 문화경관자원의 가치 해석에 관한 연구 - 도농복합지역을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Interpretation of Cultural Landscape Value - Focusing on Urban-rural Complex Area, Gwangsan-gu -

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

This study intended to interpretate the current value of the cultural landscape resources in Gwansan region, Gwangju-si. The 35 significant cultural landscape resources in Gwangsan region appear education, people in history, living residence, religion & belief, distribution of cultural site, tomb, industry, topographic scenery characteristics. They are classified such as 22 traditional landscape resources, 7 modern landscape resources, 6 natural landscape resources. The significant cultural landscape resources were evaluated by value items of 4 natural landscape, 4 social, and 5 cultural. As a result of value evaluation on the cultural landscape resources in Gwangsan region, the highest value were appeared on the cultural items, while the lowest value were appeared on the social items. And high evaluation were appeared on regional identity, cultural preservation, regional monumentality, visibility, while low evaluation were appeared on unique naturality and connectivity of assets.

Abstract

This study intended to interpretate the current value of the cultural landscape resources in Gwansan region, Gwangju-si. The 35 significant cultural landscape resources in Gwangsan region appear education, people in history, living residence, religion & belief, distribution of cultural site, tomb, industry, topographic scenery characteristics. They are classified such as 22 traditional landscape resources, 7 modern landscape resources, 6 natural landscape resources. The significant cultural landscape resources were evaluated by value items of 4 natural landscape, 4 social, and 5 cultural. As a result of value evaluation on the cultural landscape resources in Gwangsan region, the highest value were appeared on the cultural items, while the lowest value were appeared on the social items. And high evaluation were appeared on regional identity, cultural preservation, regional monumentality, visibility, while low evaluation were appeared on unique naturality and connectivity of assets.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 광산구 vision 2020 종합발전계획, "광산구", ~ (2008)
  2. "광산구지" (1994), 광산구지편찬위원회
  3. 광주근대문화유산 목록화 및 조사보고서, "광주광역시", ~ (2003)
  4. 광주광역시, "문화유적분포지도(광주광역시)", ~ (2004)
  5. 임승빈, "경관분석론(개정판)" (2009), 서울대학교출판부
  6. 정암, "지역과 경관" (2001), 선학사
  7. 박익수, "지역 건축문화유산의 보전성 평가에 관한 연구 -광주광역시 광산지역을 중심으로-", 호남대학교 관광문화연구, 11(2) (2010)
  8. 오진숙, "서울 서촌의 역사문화경관자원의 가치 해석에 관한 연구", 석사, 조경학과, pp.2011
  9. 이재준, "국토 어메니티 평가지표 개발", 한국조경학회지, 38(1), pp.25~38 (2010), 한국조경학회
  10. 정건채, "마을의 경관구조 및 경관계획에 관한 연구", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 9(25), pp.1~8 (2007), 한국농촌건축학회
  11. 주재철, "농촌마을 개발계획을 위한 어메니티특성에 관한연구 -충북 영동군 시항골권역을 대상으로-", 한국농촌건축학회논문집, 13(4), pp.133~140 (2011), 한국농촌건축학회
  12. 광산구내 비지정 문화재 보존실태 조사연구 보고서(건축유적), "박강철", 조선대학교건축문화연구실, ~ (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)