실권된 주식.전환사채의 제3자 배정에 관한 문제점
A Study on The Forfeited Stocks & Convertive Bonds
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Abstract
The company, when will increase the capital, may issue new stocks by a resolution of the board of directors under the conditions as provided by the articles of incorporation, the existing shareholders have the preemptive rights which, when applicable, requires a pro rata offering of new stocks. The convertive bonds involve the privilege, at the option of the holder, of converting it into share. These bonds have been frequently issued, because they combined the safety of creditor status with opportunity for possible speculative gain which increase in price of shares beyond conversion price. When the company issue convertive bonds, the existing shareholders have the preemptive rights which requires a pro rata offering of convertive bonds in Korea Commerce Law. And in order to issue new stocks to third persons, it needs the providing of the articles of incorporation on this and the business purpose. In the issuing of the convertive bonds to third persons, directors must comply as provided by the articles of incorporation. but if no providing of the articles, directors must perform by a special resolution of the shareholders meeting. Therefore the forfeited stocks should be subscribed under the conditions as provided by the law and the articles of incorporation. And the forfeited convertive bonds, if it is not any provision of the articles of incorporation on the issuing, should be subscribed by a special resolution of the shareholders meeting. If not so, the issuing price of the forfeited stocks or convertive bonds must be raised more than the issuing price which the directors set down first for shareholders.
참고문헌 (24)
- 김건식, "현물출자와 신주인수권", 법학, 31(1) (1990), 서울대
- 김교창, "M&A의 방어수단으로 발행된 전환사채의 효력", 인권과 정의, 통권 : 259 (1998), 대한변호사회
- 이철송, "전환사채 발행에 따르는 몇가지 문제점", 사법행정, 통권 : 336 (1998)
- 유영일, "M&A에 대한 방어행위로서의 전환사채 발행의 적법성", 상사판례연구, 8 (1997), 상사판례연구회
- 유영일, "방어행위의 적법성 판단에 관한 국내 판례의 법리- 현대엘리베이터 결정의 재평가 -", 기업법연구, 23(1), pp.249~274 (2009), 한국기업법학회
- 이준섭, "주주의 신주인수권 배제", 상사법연구, 13 (1994)
- 송종준, "회사지배권의 쟁탈과 자본구조 변경에 의한 방어책의 효 력", 법조 (1997)
- 송종준, "經營權紛爭 중 防禦權濫用의 判斷基準", 인권과 정의, (351), pp.100~122 (2005), 대한변호사협회
- 전삼현, "轉換社債發行時의 株主保護", 上場協, (48) (2003)
- 정동윤, "경영권을 지키기 위한 신주 및 잠재적 주식의 발행", 박길 준교수화갑기념논문집(Ⅰ), ~ (1998)
- 최준선, "전환사채발행의 무효", 고시연구, 통권 : 378 (2005)
- 한창희, "상사판례연구Ⅳ in 전환사채발행의 무효" (2000), 박영사
- 주식회사 자본조달에 관한 연구, "권기범", 코협, ~ (2001)
- 이기수, "회사법" (2009), 박영사
- 이철송, "회사법강의" (2009), 박영사
- 정동윤, "회사법" (2005), 법문사
- 정찬형, "상법강의(상)" (2009), 박영사
- 최기원, "신회사법론" (2009), 박영사
- 최준선, "회사법" (2009), 삼영사
- DeMott, "Current Issues in Tender Offer Regulation: Lessons from the British", N.Y.U.L. Rev, 58 (1983)
- Andrew Hicks, "Cases & Materials on Company Law", ~ (2004)
- 吉本健一, "新株發行のメカニズと法規制" (2007), 中央經濟社
- 近藤光男, "最新株式會社法" (2007), 中央經濟社
- 森淳二郞, "會社法における主要論点の評價" (2007), 中央經濟社
