기업지배구조와 규제간의 상관성 모색 : 영국의 기업지배구조법제 변천에 기초하여
Corporate Governance and Regulation: Examination of the UK corporate governance environment between 1990-2010.
0
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper investigates the relationship with corporate governance and regulation based on the lots of governance initiatives published in the period of 1990s-2010 in UK. There have been few continuous analyses to assess the performance of these changes, and to identify subsequent changes to corporate governance structures. This paper measures the extent to which the corporate governance structures in UK changed between 1990-2010 and uses this research to assess the impact of UK corporate governance revolution on Korea in the future. Since the early 1990s, the UK has witnessed a vibrant debate on corporate governance issues. The roots of this debate can be traced to a series of governance failures that led to calls for the improved regulation of companies. These incidents lead to a publication of lots of governance initiatives including Cadbury Report, Turnbull Report, Hampel Report, Rutsman Report, Greenbury Report, Myer Report, Smiths Report, Higgs report etc. during the 1990s. Based on these experiences, the current UK system has led to have largely voluntary governance codes. However, the efforts of the these report have gradually tightened the governance system since the early 1990s. The recommendations from these reports and the subsequent Codes have had a far-reaching influence on the managerial practice. Listed companies on the UK Stock Exchange are required to adhere to the Combined Code, and to report details of their compliance in their corporate reports. The Code is set of recommendation for UK Public companies, and firms are required only to disclose either their compliance with the guidlines or to give reasons for non-compliance. However, after the experience of 2007-2008 financial crisis, the environment of corporate governance has changed radially. The Financial Reporting Council(FRC) has published the new 'UK Corporate Governance Code' which replaces the Combined Code for accounting periods beginning on or after 29 June 2010. The new Code stipulates that all directors of FTSE 350 companies be put up for reelection every year and an express reference to gender diversity in the Code principles on board appointments. In addition, despite some opposition form listed companies, the Financial Reporting Council is pressing ahead with the requirement for external evaluation of board reviews at least every three years, but initially just for FTSE 350 companies. The new Code has added additional responsibility to and emphasis on the role of the Chairman and all non-executive directors will be required to devote more time to the discharge of their responsibilities. Many of these recent corporate governance reforms allow us to look in details to corporate governance's framework and its formation history. However this study suggests that UK corporate governance framework has been developed on the basis of the different environment such as share ownership, financial constraints and financial market.
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship with corporate governance and regulation based on the lots of governance initiatives published in the period of 1990s-2010 in UK. There have been few continuous analyses to assess the performance of these changes, and to identify subsequent changes to corporate governance structures. This paper measures the extent to which the corporate governance structures in UK changed between 1990-2010 and uses this research to assess the impact of UK corporate governance revolution on Korea in the future. Since the early 1990s, the UK has witnessed a vibrant debate on corporate governance issues. The roots of this debate can be traced to a series of governance failures that led to calls for the improved regulation of companies. These incidents lead to a publication of lots of governance initiatives including Cadbury Report, Turnbull Report, Hampel Report, Rutsman Report, Greenbury Report, Myer Report, Smiths Report, Higgs report etc. during the 1990s. Based on these experiences, the current UK system has led to have largely voluntary governance codes. However, the efforts of the these report have gradually tightened the governance system since the early 1990s. The recommendations from these reports and the subsequent Codes have had a far-reaching influence on the managerial practice. Listed companies on the UK Stock Exchange are required to adhere to the Combined Code, and to report details of their compliance in their corporate reports. The Code is set of recommendation for UK Public companies, and firms are required only to disclose either their compliance with the guidlines or to give reasons for non-compliance. However, after the experience of 2007-2008 financial crisis, the environment of corporate governance has changed radially. The Financial Reporting Council(FRC) has published the new 'UK Corporate Governance Code' which replaces the Combined Code for accounting periods beginning on or after 29 June 2010. The new Code stipulates that all directors of FTSE 350 companies be put up for reelection every year and an express reference to gender diversity in the Code principles on board appointments. In addition, despite some opposition form listed companies, the Financial Reporting Council is pressing ahead with the requirement for external evaluation of board reviews at least every three years, but initially just for FTSE 350 companies. The new Code has added additional responsibility to and emphasis on the role of the Chairman and all non-executive directors will be required to devote more time to the discharge of their responsibilities. Many of these recent corporate governance reforms allow us to look in details to corporate governance's framework and its formation history. However this study suggests that UK corporate governance framework has been developed on the basis of the different environment such as share ownership, financial constraints and financial market.
참고문헌 (49)
- G20 국가의 출구전략에 관한 법제 연구-영국, "안수현", 한국법제연구원, ~ (2010)
- "기업지배구조와 정부의 역할"[URL]
- 안수현, "회계제도개혁법의 입법 현황과 실무상 몇 가지 고려점 ―美國 Sarbanes-Oxley Act와의 비교를 통하여", 증권법연구, 4(2), pp.233~267 (2003), 한국증권법학회
- 양만식, "사회적 책임투자와 기업지배구조", 기업법연구, 24(2), pp.197~229 (2010), 한국기업법학회
- 이상복, "기업지배구조와 기관투자자의 역할", 기업법연구, 22(4), pp.247~292 (2008), 한국기업법학회
- 최문희, "임원의 보수규제에 관한 고찰 － 최근의 국제적 동향과 입법례를 중심으로 －", 경영법률, 20(3), pp.131~182 (2010), 한국경영법률학회
- 최수정, "기업의 내부통제제도 확립을 위한 법적 개선방안", 박사, pp.2010
- 川島いつみ, "イギリス新會社法における株主代表訴訟制度", 比較法學, 43(2) (2009)
- Edward J. Balleisen, "Government and Markes-Toward a New Theory of Regulation" (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Mayson, French, "Ryan on, Company Law, 26th ed" (2009), Company Law
- Richard Smerdon, "A Practical Guide to Corporate Governance" (1998), Sweet& Maxwell
- Andrei Shleifer, "A Survey of Corporate Governance", Journal of Finance, 52 (1997)
- Black B, "Hail Britannia:Institutional Investor Behavior under Limited Regulation", Michigan Law Rev, 92 (1994)
- Bernard S.Black, "Shareholder Passivity Reexamined", Michigan Law Rev, 89, pp.520~ (1990)
- Corporate Governance in the United Kingdom: Changes to the regulatory Template and Company Practice form 1998-2002, "Bruce A. Rayton", University of Bath School of Management, ~ (2004)
- Carkham,J, "Corporate Governance: Overcoded? Has Hampel meant Progress?", European Business Journal, 10(4) (1998)
- Chris Mallin, "The Financial Sector and Corporate Governance: The UK Case", Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(4) (2005)
- Coombers, P., "Why Code of Governance Work", McKinsey Quarterly, 2 (2004)
- Drennan, L., Beck, "From Cadbury to Turnbull: Finding a Place for Risk Management", Insurance Research and Practice, 16(1) (2001)
- Fried Frank, "Memorandum-UK Corporate Governance: A Radical Shift in the Landscape?", ~ (2009)
- Greenbury, Sir Richard, "Directors' remuneration., Report of a Study group chaired by Sir Richard Greenbury" (1995), Gee Publishing Ltd
- Committee on Corporate Governance, "Hampel, Sir Ronald", The Committee on Corporate Governance and Gee Publishing Ltd, ~ (1998)
- Higgs, "Review of the Role and Effectiveness of Bon-executive Directors", Department of Trade and Industry:London,UK, ~ (2003)
- Enforcement Strategies in UK Corporate Governance: A Roadmap and Empirical Assessmen, "John Armour", ECGI, ~, pp.Law Working Paper Nr 106 (2008), 2008
- Jones, P, "Corporate Social Responsibility and the UK's Top Ten Retailers", International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management (2005)
- Julian Franks, "Corporate Governance in the UK- contrasted with the US System", CESifo Forum (2002)
- Lskavyan, V., "Ownership Concentration, Market Monitoring and Performance Evidence from the UK, the Czech Republic and Poland", Journal of Applied Economics, 9 (2006)
- Mary A.O'Sullivan, "What Opportunity Is Knocking?,Government and Markets-Toward A New Theory of Regulation" (2010)
- Ireland, "Financialization and Corporate Governance", Northern Irland Legal Quarterly (2009)
- NAPF, "Good Corporate Governance" (1996), National Association of Pension Funds
- Institutional Shareholders and Corporate Governance: The Case of UK Pension Funds, "Mar Faccio", ~, pp.CERP working paper No. 11, 01
- Paddy Ireland, "Financialization and Corporate Governance", Northern Irland Legal Quarterly (2009)
- "Institutional Investment, in the UK-A Review"[URL]
- Rafael La Porta, "Corporate Ownership Around the World", Journal of Finance, 54, pp.471~ (1999)
- Ruth V. Aguilera, "Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility: a Comparative Analysis of the UK and the US", Corporate Governance: A International Review, 14(3) (2006)
- Internal Control and Financial Reporting. Guidance for Directors of Listed Companies, "Rutteman Working Group", Institute of Chartered Accountants of England & Wales, ~ (1994)
- Smith, Sir Robert, "Audit Committees, Combined Code Guidance" (2003), Financial Reporting Council
- "In Letter but not in Sprit: An Analysis of Corporate Governance in the UK" (2006)[URL]
- Turnbull, N., "Guidance for directors on the combined code", The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England & Wales, ~ (1999)
- The Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance(The Cadbury Report), "Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance", Gee and Co. Ltd, ~ (1992)
- "A Review of Corporate Governance in UK Banks and Other Financial Industry Entities, Final Recommendations/webarchive. nationalarchives.gov.uk/+" (2009)[URL]
- FSA, "Effective Corporate overnance", significant influence controlled functions and the Walker Review, 3 (2010)
- FSA, "Reforming Remuneration Practices in financial Service", ~ (2009)
- FSA, "Effective Corporate Governance", significant influence controlled functions and the Walker Review, 10(3) (2010)
- "ISC Code(institutionalshareholderscommittee.org.uk", sitebuklderco ntent, ISCCode161109.pdf)[DOI]
- OECD, "Principles of Corporate Governance", ~ (2004)
- "A Comparison of the UK and the US Tax Treatment of Investments, International Taxation" (2009)[URL]
- "Distribution of Offshore Funds into the UK"[URL]