본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

최근 판례를 통해 본 보험자의 자기신체사고 책임 - 대법원 2009. 2. 26. 선고 2008다59834, 59841판결 -

A review on the Responsibility of Insurant Self Physical Accident Through the Supreme Court Case

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류법학

초록

A self physical accident insurance is a kind of the damage insurance that, in case of the insured person injured by an accident of the insured automobile, the insurer has to pay the insurant the insured money prescribed by the automobile insurance policy about the personal damages caused by an accident of the insured automobile while the insurant manage, own, and use the insured automobile. Therefore, this Article discusses about what to see insurance accident in self physical accident and it is a scope of the problem how to interpret the range of Article 11 of the Automobile Insurance Standard Clauses or how to admit a causal relationship between accidents and injuries. Even if an accident caused by the operation during operation of insured automobile was interpreted limitedly, the controversy shall be deemed to continue against the insured automobile accident while insurant manage, own, use the insured automobile without regard to their operation under the precedent cases and the practical business circumstances. Thus, the Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act also regulates, with the same interpretation of the precedent cases and the practical business circumstances, the liability for damage caused by automobile accident in cases where any person who operates an automobile for personal use has killed or injured another person by such operation of the insured automobile. This Article examines the legal matters related to the responsibility of the insurant self physical accident and the application of the automobile insurance policy in order to solve the problems occurred from the frequent confusions resulted from the different interpretations of the range of Article 11 of the Automobile Insurance Standard Clauses through the supreme court case that handled the specific accident occurred in the process of opening and closing the door of the insured automobile.

Abstract

A self physical accident insurance is a kind of the damage insurance that, in case of the insured person injured by an accident of the insured automobile, the insurer has to pay the insurant the insured money prescribed by the automobile insurance policy about the personal damages caused by an accident of the insured automobile while the insurant manage, own, and use the insured automobile. Therefore, this Article discusses about what to see insurance accident in self physical accident and it is a scope of the problem how to interpret the range of Article 11 of the Automobile Insurance Standard Clauses or how to admit a causal relationship between accidents and injuries. Even if an accident caused by the operation during operation of insured automobile was interpreted limitedly, the controversy shall be deemed to continue against the insured automobile accident while insurant manage, own, use the insured automobile without regard to their operation under the precedent cases and the practical business circumstances. Thus, the Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act also regulates, with the same interpretation of the precedent cases and the practical business circumstances, the liability for damage caused by automobile accident in cases where any person who operates an automobile for personal use has killed or injured another person by such operation of the insured automobile. This Article examines the legal matters related to the responsibility of the insurant self physical accident and the application of the automobile insurance policy in order to solve the problems occurred from the frequent confusions resulted from the different interpretations of the range of Article 11 of the Automobile Insurance Standard Clauses through the supreme court case that handled the specific accident occurred in the process of opening and closing the door of the insured automobile.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김광록, "자동차보험에서의 피보험자 개별적용 - 보상실무상의 적용을 중심으로", 상사판례연구, 21(3), pp.123~164 (2008), 한국상사판례학회
  2. 남원식, "조문별해석 자동차보험약관" (1998), 한울출판사
  3. 민동휘, "보험자의 자기신체사고 보상책임", 월간손해보험, (359) (1998), 손해보험협회
  4. 박세민, "자동차보험법의 이론과 실무" (2007), 세창출판사
  5. 박세민, "보험법" (2011), 박영사
  6. 양승규, "보험법" (1998), 삼지원
  7. 정준택, "자동차보험표준약관 개정내용 해설", 월간손해보험, 통권 : 429 (2004), 손해보험협회
  8. 정준택, "차내 질식사의 자손사고 해당여부", 월간손해보험, 통권 : 345 (1997), 손해보험협회
  9. 조규성, "자동차손해배상보장법 제3조상의 운행기인성에 관한 판례연구 (대법원 2009. 4. 9. 선고 2008다93629판결)", 법학연구, 50(1), pp.81~101 (2009), 법학연구소
  10. 자동차보험에서의 운행의 개념에 대한 최근판례분석, "최병규", 한국경영법률학회, ~ (2010)
  11. 홍승인, "보험에서의 자동차 “운행” 개념 ― 각국의 태도와 우리나라의 해석기준 ―", 상사법연구, 22(4), pp.267~293 (2003), 한국상사법학회
  12. 鈴木辰紀, "自動車保險" (1998), 成文堂
  13. 鴻 常夫, "註釋 自動車保險約款(上)" (1995), 有斐閣

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)