환상형 순환출자에 관한 회사법적 검토 - 의결권 제한 가능성을 중심으로-
A Study on Circular Shareholding from Corporate Law Perspective the Possibility of Restriction on Voting Rights
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Circular shareholding is a form of mutual equity ownership by three or more companies, through purchase of shares or subscription od new shares. Circular shareholding occurs because of the ‘Chaebol’ ownership structure, where the control power makes heavy investment on the highest-ranking company in the chain, which functions as the holding company within the Chaebol structure. If the controller does not have the sufficient shares within the highest-ranking company to exert control over core companies, lower-ranking companies come to invest in the highest ranking company or core companies, causing circular shareholding. That is, circular shareholding can be seen as a form of ownership structure where the controller of Chaebol seeks to expand its control over the affiliated companies. Therefore, in Korea, circular shareholding has mainly been seen as a Chaebol governance problem related to Korean Fair Trade Act, and has been indirectly regulated by this act in the form of limitation in total amount of investment. However, circular shareholding should be seen as a form of mutual shareholding between companies, which is regulated by the Korean Commercial Act. Therefore, the relation of circular shareholding could be better understood from the Commercial Act’s viewpoint, rather than from the Fair Trade Act’s viewpoint, where policy considerations are more important. With this point in mind, this article examines the regislatiive intent and regulative range of the mutual shareholding regulations within the Korean Commercial Act. Also, this article analyzes ownership structure of the mutual shareholding and, then, What this structure causes problems from th viewpoint of corporate law. Finally, assuming that circular shareholding with such corporate law problems needs to be regulated by the Commercial Act, this article will examine if circular shareholding may be regulated through the limitations in voting rights within the present state of the law.
Abstract
Circular shareholding is a form of mutual equity ownership by three or more companies, through purchase of shares or subscription od new shares. Circular shareholding occurs because of the ‘Chaebol’ ownership structure, where the control power makes heavy investment on the highest-ranking company in the chain, which functions as the holding company within the Chaebol structure. If the controller does not have the sufficient shares within the highest-ranking company to exert control over core companies, lower-ranking companies come to invest in the highest ranking company or core companies, causing circular shareholding. That is, circular shareholding can be seen as a form of ownership structure where the controller of Chaebol seeks to expand its control over the affiliated companies. Therefore, in Korea, circular shareholding has mainly been seen as a Chaebol governance problem related to Korean Fair Trade Act, and has been indirectly regulated by this act in the form of limitation in total amount of investment. However, circular shareholding should be seen as a form of mutual shareholding between companies, which is regulated by the Korean Commercial Act. Therefore, the relation of circular shareholding could be better understood from the Commercial Act’s viewpoint, rather than from the Fair Trade Act’s viewpoint, where policy considerations are more important. With this point in mind, this article examines the regislatiive intent and regulative range of the mutual shareholding regulations within the Korean Commercial Act. Also, this article analyzes ownership structure of the mutual shareholding and, then, What this structure causes problems from th viewpoint of corporate law. Finally, assuming that circular shareholding with such corporate law problems needs to be regulated by the Commercial Act, this article will examine if circular shareholding may be regulated through the limitations in voting rights within the present state of the law.
참고문헌 (39)
- 강위두, "주주평등의 원칙", 고시계, 34(4)통권 : 386 (1989)
- 강형철, "기업집단 지배-소유 괴리 측정에 관한 연구 : 임계지배권방법을 중심으로" (2007), 한국증권연구원
- 구만회, "자기주식의 취득 –그 규제 및 완화에 관하여-, In 재판자료: 증권거래에 관한 문제점(상) 제90집" (2001), 법원도서관
- 권오승, "경제법(제7판)" (2009), 법문사
- 김동환, "금융 포커스 : 순환출자의 문제점과 해결방안에 관한 소고", 주간 금융 브리프, 14(37) (2005), 금융연구원
- 김동환, "순환출자규제와 관련된 몇 가지 법경제학적 논점", 주간 금융 브리프, 14(40) (2005), 금융연구원
- 김상규, "상호주 규제에 관한 연구", 법학논총, 14 (1997), 한양대학교 법학연구소
- 김진방, "재벌의 소유구조" (2005), 나남
- 김재범, "주주평등의 원칙을 개관함", 안암법학, 4 (1996), 안암법학회
- 김태진, "주주평등원칙에 관한 소고", 기업법연구, 22(3), pp.9~52 (2008), 한국기업법학회
- 김화진, "기업인수합병" (2007), 박영사
- 김화진, "이사회" (2007), 박영사
- 순환출자금지에 대한 최근 논의와 대안적 검토, "김현종", 한국경제연구원, ~ (2006)
- 김현종, "순환출자구조에 대한 경제학적 분석", 규제연구, 19(1), pp.131~154 (2010), 한국규제학회
- 박명서, "주식상호보유의 법적 규제, In 법학의 현대적 제문제:덕암김병대교수 화갑기념논문집" (1998)
- 박상인, "출자총액제한제도의 대안 연구:(환상형)순환출자금지를 중심으로", 경쟁법연구, 14 (2006), 한국경쟁법학회
- 박찬규, "대규모 기업집단의 순환출자 해소를 위한 최적화 모형", 한국경영과학회지, 34(4), pp.73~89 (2009), 한국경영과학회
- 권기범, "제4판 주석 상법(4)" (2003), 한국사법행정학회
- 손주찬, "상법(상)" (2002), 박영사
- 신석훈, "회사소유-지배 괴리 현상에 대한 법경제학적 접근", 한국경제법학회 학술대회 발표문 (2009)
- 신현윤, "경제법" (2007), 법문사
- 심헌섭, "분석과 비판의 법철학" (2001), 법문사
- 이철송, "회사법강의(제20판)" (2012), 박영사
- 李哲松, "相互株에 관한 硏究", 박사, 상사법, pp.1983
- 이호영, "독점규제법의 이론과 실무" (2006), 홍문사
- 환상형 순환출자의 본질에 대한 이해 및 정책방향, "임영재", 한국개발연구원, ~, pp.KDI정책포럼 제169호 (2006)
- 환상형 순환출자 규율의 도입방안: 사전적․행정적 규율 vs. 사후적․사적규율, "임영재", 한국개발연구원, ~, pp.KDI정책포럼 제170호 (2006)
- 기업집단과 순환출자, "임영재", 한국개발연구원, ~ (2009)
- 임영철, "공정거래법" (2008), 법문사
- 원용수, "경제민주화 관련 제도의 도입에 관한 입법론적 고찰", 경제법연구, 11(2), pp.153~172 (2012), 한국경제법학회
- 전삼현, "순환출자금지법안에 대한 검토, In 기업소송연구" (2007), 다사랑
- 정호열, "경제법" (2010), 박영사
- 정쾌영, "株主平等의 原則에 대한 再考", 상사판례연구, 23(4), pp.135~162 (2010), 한국상사판례학회
- 조성빈, "소유-통제의 괴리 측정 방법론에 관한 소고", KDI 연구자료, ~
- 심충진, "소유구조와 순부가가치와의 관계에 관한 연구", 2005년 한국세무학회 춘계학술대회 발표논문집 (2005)
- 최기원, "상법학신론(상)" (2004), 박영사
- 대규모기업집단의 순환출자 현황 및 해소 지분가치, "최정욱", 경제개혁연구소, ~, pp.경제개혁리포트(2012-15) (2012)
- 최준선, "회사법 제7판" (2012), 삼영사
- 홍명수, "대규모기업집단 규제에 대한 평가 및 정책방향의 검토", 경제법연구, 5(1) (2006)
