중국경제법의 입법방향 결정요인에 대한 연구 -사회총체이익본위관을 중심으로-
A decisive factor of economic Law legislation in china - Viewed from the Standard of Social benefit -
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The legislative system revolution is at the peak in china. Including the labor law which came into effect at the last Jan. 1. 2008 and Anti-monopoly law which will come into effect at the next Aug. 1. 2008, Too many lawmaking, specially in a economic law area, add more fuel to the opening market and revolution of China. It is almost caused by the acception to the WTO entrance conditions. Most of these kind legislation has the will of opening market, participation and it's revolution of China. This paper would analyse the social benefit standard of chinese economic law which is serve to the decisive factor of economic law's legislation direction. but it must pay attention to that social benefit standard is not the sole law-philosophical factor to decide the legislation direction of chinese economic law. Too many scientific research paper for the human benefit standard in a recent could explain this academic circumstance in china. From building the notion of social benefit, I will consider the circulative history of individualism and totalism which was appeared in the change of law system. And through analysing the development history and the reason of problem that china is faced with now, I will make a close investigation into the decision factor and direction of china economic law. Chinese economic law works on the every field connected with building market economic system and promoting it's improvement, therefore, It exists and expand it's field with exceeding the role of complement the weak points of private law. Specially at the present surrounding which is developing to the completely different direction with the past, The market's new and various demand to the economic law will accelerate it. So China government just as America will pursue the conversion of development direction that world market system fit for the chinese participation to it. and chinese economic law will play a leading role through the legislation suited to it´s purpose. This purpose will be progressed, by three principle namely maximum, generalization, continuance of private benefit pursuit, to the direction beneficial for social total benefit of China.
Abstract
The legislative system revolution is at the peak in china. Including the labor law which came into effect at the last Jan. 1. 2008 and Anti-monopoly law which will come into effect at the next Aug. 1. 2008, Too many lawmaking, specially in a economic law area, add more fuel to the opening market and revolution of China. It is almost caused by the acception to the WTO entrance conditions. Most of these kind legislation has the will of opening market, participation and it's revolution of China. This paper would analyse the social benefit standard of chinese economic law which is serve to the decisive factor of economic law's legislation direction. but it must pay attention to that social benefit standard is not the sole law-philosophical factor to decide the legislation direction of chinese economic law. Too many scientific research paper for the human benefit standard in a recent could explain this academic circumstance in china. From building the notion of social benefit, I will consider the circulative history of individualism and totalism which was appeared in the change of law system. And through analysing the development history and the reason of problem that china is faced with now, I will make a close investigation into the decision factor and direction of china economic law. Chinese economic law works on the every field connected with building market economic system and promoting it's improvement, therefore, It exists and expand it's field with exceeding the role of complement the weak points of private law. Specially at the present surrounding which is developing to the completely different direction with the past, The market's new and various demand to the economic law will accelerate it. So China government just as America will pursue the conversion of development direction that world market system fit for the chinese participation to it. and chinese economic law will play a leading role through the legislation suited to it´s purpose. This purpose will be progressed, by three principle namely maximum, generalization, continuance of private benefit pursuit, to the direction beneficial for social total benefit of China.
참고문헌 (37)
- 範忠信, "中國法律傳統的基本精神" (2006), 山東人民出版社
- 沈宗靈, "法律學" (2000), 北京大學出版社
- 漆多俊, "經濟法基礎理論" (2000), 武漢大學出版社
- 朱學勤, "書齋裏的革命" (1999), 長春出版社
- 陳興良, "刑法的價?構造" (1998), 人民大學出版社
- Friedrich Hayek, "通往奴役之路』王明毅(譯)" (1997), 中國社會科學出版社
- 梁治平, "尋求自然秩序中的和諧-中國傳統法律文化?究" (1997), 中國政法大學出版社
- 張乃根, "西方哲學史綱", 中國政法大學出版社, ~ (1997)
- 孫國華(編), "法理學敎程" (1994), 人民大學出版社
- 盧?奇, "關於社會存在的本體論(下)" (1993), 重慶出版社
- 沈宗靈, "現代西方法理論" (1992), 北京大學出版社
- 公丕祥, "馬克思法哲學思想述論" (1992), 河南人民出版社
- 丹宗昭信, "現代經濟法入門" (1985), 群衆出版社
- Roscoe Pound, "通過法律的社會控制--法律的任務" (1984), 商務印書館
- Roscoe Pound, "法理學", 法律出版社, 3 (1984)
- 陳銳雄, "民法總則新論" (1982), 三民書局
- 北京大學哲學係, "古希臘羅馬哲學" (1957), 三聯書店
- Peter Stein, "西方社會的法律價 王獻平(譯)" (1990), 中國人民公安大學 出版社
- Edgar Bodenheimer, "法理?-法律哲??法律方法 , 正?(譯)" (2004), 中國政法大學 出版社
- 徐孟洲, "論我國反壟斷法的價", 法學家, 1 (2008), 人民大學出版社
- 王仰文, "我國私有財?權法律保護文本考察" (2007), 沈陽工程學院 出版社
- 梁上上, "利益的層次結構與利益衡量的展開 in 中國法學會" (2002), 中國法學
- 李友根, "社會整體利益代表機制?究", 南京大學學報, (2) (2002)
- 鄧正來, "市民社會和國家 , 國家與市民社會" (2002), 中央編譯出版社
- 李友根, "社會整體利益代表機制?究", 南京大學學報, (2) (2002), 南京大學出版社
- 董之偉, "法權中心的猜想與證明", 中國法學, (6) (2001), 中國法學會
- 馬長山, "西方法制治?生的深層曆史根源 , 當代挑戰及其?示--對國家與市民社會關系視角的重新審視", 法律科學, (6) (2001)
- 榮釗, "馬克思的國家和社會理論", 中國社會科學, (3) (2001), 中國社會科學院
- 付子堂, "對利益問題的法律解釋", 法學家, (2) (2001), 人民大學出版社
- 單飛躍, "經濟法的法治理念探素" (2000), 第8屆全國經濟法理論?討會交流論文集
- 郭道暉, "論立法中的利益分配與調節", 湘江法律論壇, (2) (1998), 湖南人民出版社
- 劉大洪, "論經濟法效益" (1998), 第6屆全國經濟法理論?討會交流論文集
- 王全興, "可持續發展立法初探", 法商究, (3) (1998), 中南政法學院
- 江? 平, "羅馬法精神與當代中國立法", 中國法學, (1) (1995), 中國法學會
- 孫笑俠, "論法律和社會利益", 中國法學, (4) (1995), 中國法學會
- 胡平人, "立法過程中的利益表達與利益綜合", 中國行政管理, (3) (1992), 中國行政管理雜志社
- 中國國民黨中央委員會黨史委員會, "三民主義立法精神與立法方針", 胡漢民先生文集, (4) (1978)
