본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

종류주주간의 이해조정에 관한 연구

A Study on Conflicts of Interests in Classes of Shareholder

김지환
한국상사판례학회 (The Korea Commercial Cases Association)|2009.06|상사판례연구 (Commercial Cases Review)|제22권 제2호|pp. 79-114

0

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

이익충돌주주평등의 원칙종류주식종류주주총회상환주식의결권제한주식dividend이해조정class votingwarrantconflict of interests전환주식classes of shares기본정관articles of incorporationpreemptive rightsconvertible securitydissenters' rightnonvoting common sharevoting group
주제분류법학

초록

Abstract

According to the industrialization, each states of America have had the race for the invitation business, states have liberalized their states to encourage their business to stay home. The present situation is just alike in the global business world. So, our corporation law has the need of deregulation of the existing regulations. Korea Company Law(KCA) prescribes to corporation what to issue the classes of shares. A Corporation must not issue a stock that not authorized in KCA. Now classes of shares is allowed common stock, preferred stock, non-preferred stock and hybrid stock in basics on income or remaining assets distribution under KCA. By the way, KCA has the problems with difficulty of financing, corporate governance and fruition of shareholders' contract. Therefore, the government wants to revise the KCA, and introduce the various class stock. The purpose of this paper is to examine the conflict of interests in classes of shareholder on 2006, 2007, 2008 Reform of Korea Company Law(RKCA). Now to conclude, above all, a kind of stock for close corporation - for example tracking stock, different voting rights, share with assignment rights of director - should be adopted. And second, according to issuing classes of shares, the provision of preemptive rights, stock dividend, stock split and appraisal should be reviewed. Third, the means of equal treatment of equity interest should be reviewed to treat equal for classes of shareholders. Lastly, it is necessary to revise the class voting. And it is necessary that stock dividend is added to class voting, or on the contrary, a corporation can omit the legal items of class voting.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 이범찬, "한국회사법" (2003), 삼영사
  2. 이범찬, "상법개론" (2008), 삼영사
  3. 최준선, "회사법" (2004), 삼영사
  4. 이철송, "회사법강의" (2009), 박영사
  5. 정동윤, "閉鎖會社의 法理" (1982), 법문사
  6. 김지환, "상법개정안상 주식의 종류에 관한 일고찰", 경남법학, 23 (2008), 경남대학교 법학연구소
  7. 최준선, "종류주식의 다양화", 기업소송법연구 2005(Ⅱ), ~ (2006)
  8. 김순석, "종류주식의 다양화와 자금조달의 유연성에 관한 법적 쟁점 분석", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.9~50 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  9. 박철영, "종류주식의 다양화를 위한 법적 연구", 박사, pp.2004
  10. 권종호, "방어수단으로서 종류주식 ― 2006년 개정안과 2008년 개정안을 중심으로 ―", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.51~77 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  11. 윤영신, "민사판례연구〔ⅩⅩⅦ〕in: 회사법상 주식다양화의 한계 및 입법에 의한 다양화방안에 관한 연구" (2005), 박영사
  12. 이준섭, "주주의 신주인수권 배제", 상사법연구, 13 (1994)
  13. 김재범, "주주평등의 원칙을 개관함", 안암법학, 4 (1996), 안암법학회
  14. 김태진, "주주평등원칙에 관한 소고", 기업법연구, 22(3), pp.9~52 (2008), 한국기업법학회
  15. 송옥렬, "포이즌필의 導入에 따른 法政策的 爭點", 상사법연구, 27(2), pp.79~122 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  16. 진홍기, "株主들간 契約의 內容과 效力에 관한 硏究 － 英·美를 중심으로 우리나라와 比較法的 觀點에서 －", 상사법연구, 26(4), pp.179~229 (2008), 한국상사법학회
  17. 江頭憲治郞, "株式會社法" (2007), 有斐閣
  18. 龍田節, "會社法大要" (2007), 有斐閣
  19. 內藤良祐, "種類株式 新株豫約權の活用實務" (2006), 新日本法規
  20. 神田秀樹, "會社法" (2006), 弘文堂
  21. 神田秀樹, "新しい株式制度" (2002), 有斐閣
  22. 大野正道, "非公開會社の法理" (2007), システムファイブ
  23. 河村尙志, "定款による支配分配と種類株式の活用(一)", 法學論叢 (2005), 京都大學法學會
  24. 河村尙志, "定款による支配分配と種類株式の活用(二)", 法學論叢 (2005), 京都大學法學會
  25. 永田伯治, "種類株式の自由化と關聯する制度改正(上)", 商事法務 No.1630, ~ (2002)
  26. 高橋英治, "わが國會社法學 の課題としての株主平等原則", 商事法務 No. 1860, ~ (2009)
  27. 高橋英治, "ドイツ法における株主平等原則", 民商法雜誌, 138(2) (2008)
  28. 森本 慈, "會社法1の下における株主平等原則", 商事法務 No. 1825, ~ (2008)
  29. 楠元純一郞, "種類株式の差別的取扱いと資本再構成", 商事法務No. 1759, ~ (2006)
  30. Jeffrey J. Schick, "Toward transaction-specific standards of directorial fiduciary duty in the tracking stock context", Washington Law Review, 75, pp.1366~ (2000)
  31. Larry D. Soderquist, "Corporations and Other Business Organizations", ~ (1997), Michie
  32. Cox, "CORPORATIONS" (1997), Aspen Law ＆ Business
  33. Robert W. Hamilton, "The Laws of Corporations" (2000), West Group
  34. O'neal, "Close Corporations" (2000), West group
  35. Brain R. Cheffins, "Company Law : Theory, Structure, and Operation" (1997), Clarendon
  36. "Kann. v. Lynch Communications, Inc", 638 A.2d1110, ~ (1994)
  37. Derek, French, "Company Law 2007-2008", ~ (2007), OXFORD
  38. Jeffrey J. Hass, "Directorial Fiduciary Duties in a Tracking Stock Equity Structure : The need for a duty of Fairness", Michgam Law Review, 94, pp.2165~ (1996)
  39. Craig W. Friedrich, "S corporation One-Class-of-Stock Regulations Reissued: The service Backs Off", The Journal of corporate Taxation, 19, pp.10~ (1992)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)

미국 M&A법의 최근 동향 - 계약 속 방어수단(embedded defenses)의 적법성을 중심으로 -유영일pp. 3-29판례를 통하여 본 법인격부인론정영철pp. 33-77주권발행과 주식양도장경찬pp. 115-149대법원판례를 중심으로 본 자동차손해배상보장법상의 ‘운행으로 인하여’의 판단기준에 관한 小考조규성pp. 151-187현행 유조선에 의한 유류오염손해배상보장제도의 개선방안정영석pp. 189-210
원문 보기