금융투자회사의 업무확대 - 투자은행 관련 자본시장법 개정방향을 중심으로 -
Expansion Investment Banks -Focusing on the revision of Capital Market Act for investment banks-
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Financial Services Commission made a notice of lawmaking back in 2011 June 16 for the introduction of hedge fund tailored for Korea called the “Capital Market and Financial Investment Act(Capital Market Act)”, and on 2011 July 27, the Act was passed to vitalize domestic investment banks and reform capital market infrastructure. Foreign investment banks not only perform undertaking of securities, give advice on M&A, manage assets and private investments but also perform various tasks such as providing risk capitals for emerging companies and risk taking of prime brokers. However, although they are the core medium in the capital market, domestic investment banks only took the role of being a broker due to their financial limitation. With domestic securities companies focusing their activities on trusts and brokerage, they lost their competitiveness, withered in their functionalities as enterprise financial provider, and hence brought the creation of large investment banks. With these limited activities of investment banks in Korea, there have been talks on revising the regulation on making and managing of investment banks. Major revision would be the allowing of enterprise credit, prime broker, and ease of regulation on the use of equity capitals. There are three different organizational structure to revitalize investment banks; ①universal banking system, ②subsidiary of headquarter, and ③independent investment bank. Among the three, the revised 'The Capital Market Act' allows ② and ③ types of organizational structure. However, it is difficult even with the revision of 'The Capital Market Act' as it is realistically impossible for security companies to increase capitals to enlarge themselves, and therefore, it is forecasted that formation of subsidiary would be formed. However, the organizational structure is flexible. That is, a subsidiary can change itself to become an independent investment company and, though not desirable, it can change into an European investment bank. It is true that the Commercial Bank is in need of new source of income as their profit has decreased from traditional banking operation, but a joint operation of investment banking would bring about more risk and investment banking alone would not rid of the risk deriving from traditional banking operation.
Abstract
The Financial Services Commission made a notice of lawmaking back in 2011 June 16 for the introduction of hedge fund tailored for Korea called the “Capital Market and Financial Investment Act(Capital Market Act)”, and on 2011 July 27, the Act was passed to vitalize domestic investment banks and reform capital market infrastructure. Foreign investment banks not only perform undertaking of securities, give advice on M&A, manage assets and private investments but also perform various tasks such as providing risk capitals for emerging companies and risk taking of prime brokers. However, although they are the core medium in the capital market, domestic investment banks only took the role of being a broker due to their financial limitation. With domestic securities companies focusing their activities on trusts and brokerage, they lost their competitiveness, withered in their functionalities as enterprise financial provider, and hence brought the creation of large investment banks. With these limited activities of investment banks in Korea, there have been talks on revising the regulation on making and managing of investment banks. Major revision would be the allowing of enterprise credit, prime broker, and ease of regulation on the use of equity capitals. There are three different organizational structure to revitalize investment banks; ①universal banking system, ②subsidiary of headquarter, and ③independent investment bank. Among the three, the revised 'The Capital Market Act' allows ② and ③ types of organizational structure. However, it is difficult even with the revision of 'The Capital Market Act' as it is realistically impossible for security companies to increase capitals to enlarge themselves, and therefore, it is forecasted that formation of subsidiary would be formed. However, the organizational structure is flexible. That is, a subsidiary can change itself to become an independent investment company and, though not desirable, it can change into an European investment bank. It is true that the Commercial Bank is in need of new source of income as their profit has decreased from traditional banking operation, but a joint operation of investment banking would bring about more risk and investment banking alone would not rid of the risk deriving from traditional banking operation.
참고문헌 (33)
- 강종만, "국내금융투자회사의 투자은행업무 발전방향", 주간 금융브리프, 19(4) (2010), 한국금융연구원
- 김동환, "CIB모델의 성공을 위한 요건", 주간 금융브리프, 18(8) (2009)
- 김준호, "투자은행 육성방안", 조사연구 Review, (19) (2007)
- 김진호, "국내 투자은행(IB)의 리스크관리 방안 연구", 한국금융연구원, ~ (2010)
- 김홍기, "금융위기 이후 주요국의 투자은행업무 규제동향과 우리나라에서의 시사점", 비교사법, 18(2), pp.577~606 (2011), 한국비교사법학회
- 박광우, "은행대형화와 예금보험기금의 건전성 제고방안", 금융안정연구, 8 (2007)
- 박영규, "글로벌 금융위기 이후의 자산운용산업의 진단 및 제언", 증권예탁, 한국예탁결제원, ~ (2010)
- 이건범, "글로벌 금융위기와 바젤III 유동성 규제기준의 도입", 경제발전연구, 17(1), pp.205~243 (2011), 한국경제발전학회
- 이병목, "지급결제리스크 관리제도의 운영현황과 정책과제", 한국법제연구원 워크숍 자료집 (2011)
- 이상복, "미국 증권법상 프라임 브로커 규제에 관한 연구", 서강법학연구, 12(1), pp.403~435 (2010), 법학연구소
- 이승훈, "헤지펀드의 국내 허용과 프라임 브로커리지", 월간 하나금융 (2008)
- 이지언, "글로벌 금융위기 이후 한국형 투자은행의 진로", 주간 금융브리프, 18(35) (2009)
- 이지언, "투자은행의 기업대출 허용의 범위와 문제점", 주간 금융브리프, 20(26) (2011)
- 자본시장연구원, "국내 투자은행 활성화를 위한 공청회", 보도자료, ~ (2011)
- 전선애, "은행의 건전성 규제와 정책과제", 한국경제연구, ~ (2011)
- 정윤미, "은행의 CIB 겸업에 대한 국제논의 및 국내은행의 향후진로", 조사연구 Review, (29) (2010)
- 정윤미, "FSA 터너리포트 주요 내용", 조사연구 Review, (26) (2009)
- 정찬우, "미국 금융개혁법의 주요 내용 및 시사점", 한국금융연 구원, ~ (2010)
- 한국금융연구원 국제금융이슈, "BOA의 투자은행 인수를 통한 수익창출 사례", ~ (2010)
- 한국수출입은행, "유럽 금융위기의 내재적 요인과 문제점 분석", 해외경제․투자정보, ~ (2009)
- 한국수출입은행, "금융위기 이후 미국 대형은행의 영업형태 변화에 대한 평가", 해외경제정보, ~ (2010)
- 한국은행, "바젤III 기준서 - 글로벌 자본 및 유동성 규제체계", ~ (2011)
- 한국증권법학회, "자본시장법(주석서 II)" (2009), 박영사
- 한정미, "헤지펀드 도입을 위한 금융투자 관련 법제 정비방안 연구", ~ (2008)
- Basel committee on Banking Supervision, "Basel III : A global regulatory framework for more resilient banks and banking systems", ~ (2011)
- Basel committee on Banking Supervision, "Basel III : International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitorin g", ~ (2011)
- BIS Committee on Payment and Settlement Systems, "A glossary of terms used in payments and settlement systems", ~ (2001)
- Daniel Strachman, "Getting Started in Hedge Funds", John Wiley & Sons, Inc., ~ (2003)
