국제특허침해소송의 재판관할권 판단기준에 관한 연구 - 국제적 비교법적 연구를 바탕으로 -
A study of standards for the jurisdiction of international patent infringement litigation: a comparative study
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Worldwide distribution of patented products and infringement of patent across the nations has intensified due to the rapid globalization since the establishment of WTO. Also patentee's sense of right has matured compared to the past. Moreover worldwide invention capital, which only acquires patent right and manages or exercises it without production or R&D. Al these have resulted in the growth of the number of international patent infringement suit. Special consideration should be given to international patent suit, especially in the sense of jurisdiction unlike domestic infringement case. International jurisdiction is the matter of which nation's court has the authority to try cases with the element of conflict of laws. It is important issue not only for the competent court but for litigants because it determines the nation of which the court litigants should file a suit in. Traditionally dispute over intellectual property right can be divided into dispute over industrial property and dispute over copyright. Industrial property needs to be analyzed differently from copyright because industrial property has tendency for strong protection according to principle of territoriality and it has own processes, such as registration, unlike copyright. Discussion about international infringement of intellectual property right has not been taken enough so far. Though study of international copyright infringement has taken place in part, international patent suit has not been researched much. Therefore it is necessary to set a standard for jurisdiction of international patent suit. This article will cover following issues : First, principle of territoriality in patent right and its limit will be discussed. Second, a standard for jurisdiction of international patent suit will be sought by international and comparative legal study. Third, improvement in jurisdiction of international patent suit will be suggested by studying and criticizing related laws and cases in Korea in a way of comparative legal study. Fourth, specific standards for jurisdiction for major issues in international patent suit will be researched intensively.
Abstract
Worldwide distribution of patented products and infringement of patent across the nations has intensified due to the rapid globalization since the establishment of WTO. Also patentee's sense of right has matured compared to the past. Moreover worldwide invention capital, which only acquires patent right and manages or exercises it without production or R&D. Al these have resulted in the growth of the number of international patent infringement suit. Special consideration should be given to international patent suit, especially in the sense of jurisdiction unlike domestic infringement case. International jurisdiction is the matter of which nation's court has the authority to try cases with the element of conflict of laws. It is important issue not only for the competent court but for litigants because it determines the nation of which the court litigants should file a suit in. Traditionally dispute over intellectual property right can be divided into dispute over industrial property and dispute over copyright. Industrial property needs to be analyzed differently from copyright because industrial property has tendency for strong protection according to principle of territoriality and it has own processes, such as registration, unlike copyright. Discussion about international infringement of intellectual property right has not been taken enough so far. Though study of international copyright infringement has taken place in part, international patent suit has not been researched much. Therefore it is necessary to set a standard for jurisdiction of international patent suit. This article will cover following issues : First, principle of territoriality in patent right and its limit will be discussed. Second, a standard for jurisdiction of international patent suit will be sought by international and comparative legal study. Third, improvement in jurisdiction of international patent suit will be suggested by studying and criticizing related laws and cases in Korea in a way of comparative legal study. Fourth, specific standards for jurisdiction for major issues in international patent suit will be researched intensively.
참고문헌 (18)
- 강영수, "인터넷과 국제재판관할, In 인터넷과 법률Ⅱ" (2005), 법문사
- 강영수, "국제 지적재산권침해소송에 있어서 국제사법적 문제에 관한 연구 : 속지주의 원칙의 한계 및 그 수정을 중심으로", 박사, 법학, pp.2005
- 김문숙, "일본법원의 국제재판관할권에 관하여 -2011년 개정민사소송법을 중심으로-", 국제사법연구, (18), pp.279~331 (2012), 한국국제사법학회
- 문선영, "국제적 도메인이름분쟁의 재판관할권과 도메인이름 이전등록청구권의 인정여부 -판례평석 : 서울중앙지법 2007. 8. 30.선고 2006가합53066 판결-", 법학연구, 12(1), pp.247~282 (2009), 법학연구소
- 서정우, "공업소유권의 국제적 보호와 국제사법, 섭외사건의 제문제(상), In 재판자료 33집" (1986)
- 石光現, "國際的인 知的財産權 紛爭해결의 문제점 -國際私法的 論点에 관한 試論-, In 國際私法과 國際訴訟 제2권" (2001), 박영사
- 孫京漢, "知的財産侵害訴訟의 國際裁判管轄", 國際私法硏究, (8) (2003), 韓國國際私法學會
- 孫京漢, "특허침해소송의 국제재판관할과 준거법, In 신특허법론" (2005), 법영사
- 유영일, "국제재판관할의 실무운영에 관한 소고 - 개정 국제사법과 헤이그협약의 논의를 중심으로(하)", 법조, 51(12) (2002)
- 兪載豊, "국제소송의 재판관할에 관한 연구", 박사, 공법, pp.1995
- 이규호, "인터넷과 국제재판관할", 정보법학, 11(2), pp.109~143 (2007), 한국정보법학회
- 李聖昊, "사이버지적재산권분쟁의 재판관할과 준거법", 國際私法硏究, (8) (2003), 韓國國際私法學會
- 李聖昊, "사이버 知的財産權 紛爭에 관한 國際裁判管轄과 準據法", 저스티스, 72, pp.138~200 (2003), 한국법학원
- 李聖昊, "國際 知的財産權 紛爭의 現況과 國際私法上의 課題", 國際私法硏究, (9) (2003), 韓國國際私法學會
- 兼子一, "新修民事訴訟法體系" (1965), 酒井書店
- 池原季雄, "國際的裁判管轄權, In 新實務民事訴訟講座" (1982), 日本評論社
- "Choice of Law, and Jurisdiction in Transnational Dispute"[URL]
- "Principles on Conflict of Laws in Intellectual Property"[URL]
