約款說明義務와 法令에 規定된 事項
Study on the Duty to Explain and Provisions in the Law
0
조회
0
다운로드
23
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper is to study and analyze some important cases held by the recent Korean Supreme Court. This paper debates the explanation duty of an insurer as applied to insurance coverage disputes. Courts and most scholars have argues for the soul of contract law. Under the traditional contract theory, the assent of both parties to the terms of an agreement is necessary for creation of an enforceable contract. Provisions excluding or limiting coverage, according to the theory, would not be enforceable because of "substantialness". However, it is very difficult to discern the substantial clause and the non-substantial. And so forth, this paper also explorers some the point at issues of insurance law. In this Paper, I enunciate some suggestions of the reasonable theory to our debate about the legal nature of insurance policy. The Supreme Court construed the related matters, and this paper clarified the holding.
Abstract
This paper is to study and analyze some important cases held by the recent Korean Supreme Court. This paper debates the explanation duty of an insurer as applied to insurance coverage disputes. Courts and most scholars have argues for the soul of contract law. Under the traditional contract theory, the assent of both parties to the terms of an agreement is necessary for creation of an enforceable contract. Provisions excluding or limiting coverage, according to the theory, would not be enforceable because of "substantialness". However, it is very difficult to discern the substantial clause and the non-substantial. And so forth, this paper also explorers some the point at issues of insurance law. In this Paper, I enunciate some suggestions of the reasonable theory to our debate about the legal nature of insurance policy. The Supreme Court construed the related matters, and this paper clarified the holding.
참고문헌 (18)
- 김대규, "약관편입통제 조항의 기능성연구 -소비자보호의 관점에서-", 비교사법, 11(1), pp.251~276 (2004), 한국비교사법학회
- 김시철, "피보험자동차의 양도에 관한 통지의무를 규정한 보험약관이 보험자의 개별적 명시ㆍ설명의무의 대상인지 여부, In 대법원판례해설 제67호" (2008), 법원도서관
- 박세민, "보험법" (2011), 박영사
- 박철, "보통보험약관의 구속력, In 보험법의 쟁점" (2002), 법문사
- 손지열, "민법주해XII" (1997), 박영사
- 양승규, "보험법" (2004), 삼지원
- 양승규, "보험법의 쟁점" (2000), 법문사
- 약관의 규제에 관한 법률 해설, "이상정", 한국소비자보호원, ~, pp.연구보고서 87-03 (1987)
- 장덕조, "보험법" (2011), 법문사
- 장덕조, "保險者의 說明義務", 민사판례연구, (29), pp.1031~1078 (2007), 민사판례연구회
- 주기동, "보험자의 약관설명의무의 예외사유, In 21世紀 司法의 展開" (2005), 송민 최종영 대법원장 재임 기념문집 간행위원회
- "Couch on Insurance", ~ (2010)
- Prölss, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz" (1998), C.H.Beck
- Robert E. Keeton, "Insurance Law" (1999), West Group
- Robert H. Jerry II, "Understanding Insurance Law" (1996), LexisNexis
- Römer, "Versicherungsvertragsgesetz mit PfIVG und KfzPFIVV" (2003), C.H.Beck
- T.D. Rakoff, "Contracts of Adhesion: An Essay in Reconstruction", HARV. L. REV, 96, pp.1173~ (1983)
- "Westlaw On Line Data Base"[URL]